AN INTERACTIVE APPROACH TO PROBABILISTIC INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING IN STOCK SELECTION PROBLEM

Authors

  • Dheeraj Kumar Joshi Department of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science G. B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, India
  • Sanjay Kumar Department of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science G. B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, India

Keywords:

Probabilistic Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set, Multi-Criteria Decision Making, PIF-PIS, PIF-NIS, Distance Measure, TOPSIS

Abstract

The concurrence of randomness and imprecision exists in decision making problems (DMPs). To describe unpredictability, fuzziness and statistical uncertainty in a single frame, we have developed an interactive approach to probabilistic intuitionistic fuzzy MCDM method, in which assessment of alternative over attributes are provided by probabilistic intuitionistic fuzzy elements (PIFEs). In proposed methodology a conversion method to convert fuzzy sets to intuitionistic fuzzy sets is also used. To completely describe statistical and non-statistical uncertainty, suitable probability distribution function is associated to the both belongingness values and non-belongingness values of each one entity in constructed IFS. The core intention of this paper is to propose a PIF-TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) method for MCDM problem. Firstly, we develop distance measures for PIFEs. Probabilistic intuitionistic fuzzy positive and negative ideal solutions are also defined. A real life case study is in use as an example to illustrate the methodology of developed PIF-TOPSIS method and to find the ranking of organizations using real data. The decision making framework of proposed PIF-TOPSIS method is superior to other MCDM methods, because of introducing probabilistic information in IFEs, which can be useful to ensure the integrality and accuracy of intuitionistic fuzzy information.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Meghdadi, A. H. and Akbarzadeh-T, M. R. (2001). Probabilistic fuzzy logic and probabilistic fuzzy systems. In Fuzzy Systems, 2001, The 10th IEEE International Conference on (Vol. 3, p. 1127-1130). IEEE.

Valavanis, K. P. and Saridis, G. N. (1991). Probabilistic modeling of intelligent robotic systems, IEEE transactions on robotics and automation, 7(1), p. 164- 171.

Pidre, J. C., Carrillo, C. J. and Lorenzo, A. E. F. (2003). Probabilistic model for mechanical power fluctuations in asynchronous wind parks, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 18(2), p. 761-768

Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8 , p. 338–356.

Zadeh, L. A. (1975). Fuzzy logic and approximate reasoning, Synthese, 30(3), p. 407-428.

Lee, L. W. and Chen, S. M. (2015). Fuzzy decision making and fuzzy group decision making based on likelihood-based comparison relations of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 29(3), p. 1119-1137.

Chen, C.T. (2000). Extension of the TOPSIS for group decision making under fuzzy Environment, Journal of Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114, p. 1-9.

Chen, J. Hwang, C. L. and Hwang, F. P. (1992). Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making (methods and applications), Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

Grattan Guinness, I. (1976). Fuzzy membership mapped onto intervals and many valued quantities, Mathematical Logic Quarterly, 22(1), p. 149-160.

Liu, J., Chen, H., Xu, Q., Zhou, L. and Tao, Z. (2016). Generalized ordered modular averaging operator and its application to group decision making, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 299, p. 1-25.

Liu, J., Chen, H., Zhou, L. and Tao, Z. (2015). Generalized linguistic ordered weighted hybrid logarithm averaging operators and applications to group decision making, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 23(03), p. 421-442.

Yoon, K. P. and Hwang, C. L. (1995). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: An Introduction (Vol. 104), Sage Publications.

Zadeh, L. A. (1975). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning—I, Information sciences, 8(3), p. 199-249.

Atanassov, K.T. (1986). Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and system, 20(1), p. 87-96.

Grzegorzewski, P. (2004). Distances between intuitionistic fuzzy sets and/or interval-valued fuzzy sets based on the Hausdoff metric, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 149, p. 319-328.

Wan, S. P. and Li, D. F. (2014). Atanassov's intuitionistic fuzzy programming method for heterogeneous multi-attribute group decision making with Atanassov's intuitionistic fuzzy truth degrees, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 22(2), p. 300-312.

Wan, S. P. and Yi, Z. H. (2015). Power average of trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy numbers using strict t-norms and t-conorms, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 22(2), p. 300-312.

Joshi, D. and Kumar, S. (2014). Intuitionistic fuzzy entropy and distance measure based TOPSIS method for multi-criteria decision making, Egyptian Informatics Journal, 15(2), p. 97-104.

Joshi, D. and Kumar, S. (2018). Improved accuracy function for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its application to multi–attributes group decision making, Cybernetics and Systems, 1-13.

Laviolette, M. and Seaman, J. W. (1994). Unity and diversity of fuzziness/spl minus/from a probability viewpoint, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2(1), p. 38-42.

Zadeh, L. A. (1995). Discussion: Probability theory and fuzzy logic are complementary rather than competitive, Technometrics, 37(3), p. 271-276.

Liang, P. and Song, F. (1996). What does a probabilistic interpretation of fuzzy sets mean. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 4(2), p. 200-205.

Liu, Z. and Li, H. X. (2005). A probabilistic fuzzy logic system for modeling and control, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 13(6), p. 848-859.

Gerstenkorn, T. and Mańko, J. (1995). Bifuzzy probabilistic sets, Fuzzy sets and systems, 71(2), p. 207-214.

Agarwal, M., Biswas, K. K., and Hanmandlu, M. (2011, December). Probabilistic intuitionistic fuzzy rule based controller. In Automation, Robotics and Applications (ICARA), 2011 5th International Conference on (p. 214-219), IEEE.

Shen, F., Ma, X., Li, Z., Xu, Z. and Cai, D. (2018). An extended intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method based on a new distance measure with an application to credit risk evaluation, Information Sciences, 428, p. 105-119.

Joshi, D. K., Bisht, K. and Kumar, S. (2018). Interval-valued intuitionistic uncertain linguistic information-based TOPSIS method for multi-criteria group decision-making problems, In Ambient Communications and Computer Systems (pp. 305-315), Springer, Singapore.

Joshi, D. K. and Kumar, S. (2018). Trapezium cloud TOPSIS method with interval-valued intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy linguistic information, Granular Computing, 3(2), p. 139-152.

Jurio, A., Paternain, D., Bustince, H., Guerra, C. and Beliakov, G., (2010). A construction method of Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy sets for image processing, In 5th IEEE conference on Intelligent Systems, London, UK.

Grzegorzewski, P. and Mrówka, E. (2005). Some notes on (Atanassov's) intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy sets and systems, 156(3), p. 492-495.

Downloads

Published

2018-11-01

How to Cite

Joshi, D. K. ., & Kumar, S. . (2018). AN INTERACTIVE APPROACH TO PROBABILISTIC INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING IN STOCK SELECTION PROBLEM. Journal of Reliability and Statistical Studies, 11(02), 25–36. Retrieved from https://journals.riverpublishers.com/index.php/JRSS/article/view/20867

Issue

Section

Articles