ESTIMATION OF FINITE POPULATION MEAN USING KNOWN COEFFICIENT OF VARIATION IN THE SIMULTANEOUS PRESENCE OF NON - RESPONSE AND MEASUREMENT ERRORS UNDER DOUBLE SAMPLING SCHEME

Authors

  • Dharmendra Kumar Yadav Deptt. of Statistics, Ramanujan College, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India
  • Monika Devi Sri Karan Narendra Agriculture University, Jobner, Jaipur, India
  • Subhash Kumar Yadav Deptt. of Statistics, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University, Lucknow, India

Keywords:

Estimation, Coefficient of Variation, Non- response, Measurement Errors, Double Sampling, Simulation

Abstract

The present article considers the problem of finite population mean estimation, when the nonresponse and measurement errors are present simultaneously utilizing known information on coefficient of variation of study variable. We have developed an estimator of population mean which is improved and efficient, using Hansen and Hurwitz (1946) technique. Asymptotic expressions of the bias and variance of suggested estimator have been found correct up to approximation of degree one.The optimum value of characterizing scalar for which variance of proposed estimator is minimum has also been calculated. We have made a theoretical efficiency comparison of proposed estimator with usual Hansen Hurwitz estimator. To amply corroborate the theoretical findings, a simulation study has also been carried out using R software.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cochran, W.G. (1963). Sampling Techniques, Second Edition, Wiley Eastern Private Limited, New Delhi.

Cochran, W.G.(1968). Errors of measurement in statistics, Technometrics, 10, p. 637-666.

Devi, M., Sisodia,B.V.S. and Azfer, M.(2016). Estimation of population mean in two-stage sampling under a random response mechanism in the presence of non- response, Inter. Jour. Agri. Statistics, 12(1), p. 27-34.

Foradori, G. T. (1961). Some non-response sampling theory for two stage designs, Institute of Statistics, North Carolina State College.

Hansen, M.H. and Hurwitz, W.N.(1946). The problem of non-response in sample surveys, Journal of American Statistical Association, 41, p. 517-529.

Khare, B. B., Jha, P. S. and Kumar, K. (2015). Estimation of population proportion using auxiliary character in the presence of nonresponse, Journal of Reliability and Statistical Studies, 8(2), p. 107-117.

Kumar,S. (2014). Variance estimation in presence of random non-response, Journal of Reliability and Statistical Studies, 7(1), p. 65-70.

Misra, S. and Yadav, D. K. (2015). Estimating population mean using known coefficient of variation under measurement errors, Statistics and Informatics in Agricultural Research, Excel India Publisher, New Delhi, p. 175-182.

Misra, S., Dipika and Yadav, D. K.(2016). Some improved estimators for estimating population variance in the presence of measurement errors, Journal of Statistics Applications & Probability, Natural Science Publishing, USA, 2 (5), p. 311-320.

Misra, S., Yadav, D.K. and Dipik. (2016). An efficient estimator for estimating population variance in presence of measurement errors, International Journal of Mathematics and its Applications, 4(2), p. 23-28.

Misra, S., Yadav D.K. and Dipika (2017). Estimation of population mean using auxiliary information in presence of measurement errors, International Journal of Engineering Sciences & Research Technology, 6(6), p. 499-502.

Okafor, F. C. (2001). Treatment of non-response in successive sampling, Statistica, 61(2), p.195-204.

Okafor, F. C. (2005). Sub-sampling the non-respondents in two-stage sampling over two successive occasions, Journal of the Indian Statistical Association, 43(1), p.33-49.

Shalabh ( 1997). Ratio method of estimation in the presence of measurement errors, Jour. Ind. Soc. Ag. Statistics, 1(2), p.150-155.

Singh, H. P. and Karpe, N. (2008). Ratio-product estimator for population mean in presence of measurement errors, Journal of Applied Statistical Sciences, 16, p.49–64.

Singh, H.P. and Karpe, N. ( 2009). A general procedure for estimating the general parameter using auxiliary information in presence of measurement errors, Communication of the Korean Statistical Society, 16(5), p.821-840.

Singh, H. P. and Karpe, N. (2010). Estimation of mean, ratio and product using auxiliary information in the presence of measurement errors in sample surveys, Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice, 4(1), p.111–13

Singh, H.P. and Kumar,S. (2011). Subsampling the non-respondents in cluster sampling on sampling on two successive occasions, Statistics in Transition- New Series, 12(1), p. 9-24.

Singh, R.K. and Naqvi, N. (2015). Estimation of population mean using auxiliary information in non-response, Journal of Reliability and Statistical Studies, 8(1), p.135-14.

Srivastava, A.K. and Shalabh (2001). Effect of measurement errors on the regression method of estimation in survey sampling, Journal of Statistical Research, 35, p.35-44.

Sud, C. and Srivastava, S. K. (2000). Estimation of population mean in repeat surveys in the presence of measurement errors, Journal of Indian Society of Agricultural Statistics, 53, p.125-133.

Sukhatme, P.V, Sukhatme, B.V. ,Sukhatme, S. and Ashok, C. ( 1984). Sampling Theory of Surveys with Applications, 3rd Ed., Iowa State University Press, Ams, Iowa(USA) and Indian Society of Agricultural Statistics, New Delhi.

Tripathi, T. P. and Khare, B.B. (1997). Estimation of mean vector in presence of nonresponse, Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 26(9), p. 2255-2269.

Downloads

Published

2018-06-11

How to Cite

Yadav, D. K. ., Devi, M. ., & Yadav, S. K. . (2018). ESTIMATION OF FINITE POPULATION MEAN USING KNOWN COEFFICIENT OF VARIATION IN THE SIMULTANEOUS PRESENCE OF NON - RESPONSE AND MEASUREMENT ERRORS UNDER DOUBLE SAMPLING SCHEME. Journal of Reliability and Statistical Studies, 11(01), 51–66. Retrieved from https://journals.riverpublishers.com/index.php/JRSS/article/view/20901

Issue

Section

Articles