MIXED SAMPLING PLANS FOR MARKOFF MODEL UNDER INSPECTION ERROR
Keywords:
OC, ASN, CV, AR(1), Inspection error, Sampling Plan.Abstract
The Markoff model is examined to cost light on its physical interpretation and to facilitate its use. The purpose of this paper is, therefore, to determine and illustrate the effects of inspection error on the OC and ASN functions for independent and dependent mixed acceptance- sampling plans. Where in variable sampling plans, random error terms are considered to be according to Markoff model for coefficient of variation (CV) and attribute sampling plans analysis with regard to the choice of a sampling plan taking inspection error into consideration. A comparison between the independent and dependent mixed plan have been made in respect of OC and ASN functions under inspection error
Downloads
References
Adams, R. M. and Mirkhani, K. (1976). MixedVariables and Attributes Plan,
unknown, ASQC Annual Technical Conference Transactions, p. 292-300.
Albercher, H., Ladoucette, S. A. and Teogels, J. L. (2006). Asymptotic of the
sample coefficient of variation and the sample dispersion. KU. Leuven USC
report 2006-04.
Apley, D. W. and Tsung, F. (2002). The Autoregressive T2 Chart for
Monitoring Univariate Auto correlated Processes, Journal of Quality
Technology, 34, p. 80–96.
Bowker, A. H. and Goode, H. P. (1952). Sampling Inspection by Variables,
Mc-Graw Hill Book Co. New York.
Kao, K. (1966). Single Sampling Attrivariate plans for item Variablity in
percent Defective. American Society for quality control, Annual Technical
Conference Transactions, New York, p. 743-758.
Mahmoudvand, R.; Hassani, H. and Wilson, R. (2007). Is the sample
coefficient of variation a good estimator for the population coefficient of
variation? World Applied Science Journal, 2, p. 519-522.
Montgomery, D. C. and Mastrangelo, C. M. (1991).Some Statistical Process
Control Methods for Auto correlated Data, Journal of Quality Technology ,23,
p. 179–204.
Radhakrishnan, R. and Sampath, K. R. (2007). Construction and comparison
of mixed sampling plans having double sampling plan as attribute plan,
International Journal of Statistics and Systems, 2, p. 133-139.
Radhakrishnan, R. and Sampath, K. R. (2009). Construction and comparison
of mixed samplingplans having ChSP-(0,1) plan as attribute plan, Int. J. Stat.
& Manage. System, 4, p. 134-149.
R. Radhakrishnan and Mallika, M. (2010). Construction of Double Sampling
Plan Using Convex Combination of AOQL and MAAOQ, International
Journal of Applied Statistics and Mathematics, 17, p. 90-95.
Sampath, K. R.; Indra, M. and Radhakrishan, R. (2012). Selection of mixed
sampling plan with QSS-1(n;cN,cT) plan as attribute plan indexed through
MAPD and AQL, Indian Journal of Science and Technology , 5(2), p. 2096-
Savage, I. R. (1955). Mixed Variables and Attributes plans, the Exponential
Case. Technical Repert 23, applied Mathematics and Statistics Laboratory,
Standford University, California.
Schilling, E. G. (1967). A General Method for Determining the OC of Mixed
Variable-Attribute Sampling Plans, Single Sided Specifications, SD known.
Ph. D. Dissertation, Rutgers .The State University, New Brunswick , New
Jersey.
Suresh, K. K. and Devaarul, S. (2000). Mixed sampling Plan with DSP as
Attribute Plan, International Symposium on Advance in Statistical Methods,
Madras University, India.
Suresh, K. K. and Devaarul, S.(2002). Combining process and product control
for reducing sampling costs, Economic Quality Control, 2, p. 187-194.
Suresh, K. K. and Devaarul, S.(2003). multidimensional mixed sampling
plans, Quality Engineering, 16, p. 233-237.
Tian, L. (2005). Inferences on the common coefficient of variation, Statistics
in Medicine, 24, p. 2213-2220.
