Semantics-Aware Context-Based Learner Modelling Using Normalized PSO for Personalized E-learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13052/jwe1540-9589.2148Keywords:
Personalized E-learning Recommendation; Contextual Learner Model; Semantic Analysis; Knowledge Graph; Normalized PSO; Prefix Tree.Abstract
E-learning proves its importance in the diverse educational levels over traditional education. An adaptive e-learning system needs to deduce the learner model for adding personalization to instructional websites. The learner model is the perception repository about the e-content user, which can be inferred implicitly by employing meaningful semantic analysis of the text. In this research, a novel methodology is proposed to conceptually deduce the semantic learner model for personalized e-learning recommendations. Firstly, Conceptual Learner Model (CLM) is developed based on the learner’s behavior and context-based text semantic representation by exploiting concepts from the ConceptNet knowledge base, with a significant association of patterns and rules. Then, Expanded Contextual Learner Model (ECLM) is developed by exploring the latent semantics in graphs to add concepts with the common-sense meanings that exceeded the named entities. The learner’s knowledge graph is defined based on contextually associated concepts. Semantic relations in ConceptNet are exploited to extend learner models. The Normalized Particle Swarm Optimization (NPSO) algorithm is used to learn the importance of the relation types between the concepts. Thus, CLM and ECLM each are represented as a vector of weighted concepts in which updating is obtained automatically. The proposed recommendation system incorporates dynamic learner models to predict an appropriate e-content with the highest ranking, matching the true needs of a particular learner. Our simulation results show that the performance of ECLM is better Mean Reciprocal Rank (MRR) value 0.780 than other existing methods.
Downloads
References
N. S. Raj, V. G. Renumol, ‘A systematic literature review on adaptive content recommenders in personalized learning environments from 2015 to 2020’, Journal of Computers in Education, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-021-00199-4
K. Mangaroska and M. Giannakos, ‘Learning Analytics for Learning Design: A Systematic Literature Review of Analytics-Driven Design to Enhance Learning’, in IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 516–534, 1 Oct.–Dec. 2019, https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2018.2868673.
H. Ezaldeen, R. Misra, R. Alatrash, R. Priyadarshini, ‘Semantically enhanced machine learning approach to recommend e-learning content’, International Journal of Electronic Business, Vol. 15, No. 4, 2020, pp. 389–413. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEB.2020.111095
H. Ezaldeen, R. Misra, R. Alatrash, R. Priyadarshini, ‘Machine Learning Based Improved Recommendation Model for E-learning’, 2019 International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Remote Sensing (ICICRS), 2019, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICRS46726.2019.9555866.
H. Liu and P. Singh, ‘ConceptNet — A Practical Commonsense Reasoning Tool-Kit’, BT Technology Journal, Vol. 22, 2004, pp. 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BTTJ.0000047600.45421.6d
R. Speer and C. Havasi, ‘ConceptNet 5: A Large Semantic Network for Relational Knowledge’, In: Gurevych I., Kim J. (eds) The People’s Web Meets NLP. Theory and Applications of Natural Language Processing, 2013, pp. 161–176, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35085-6_6
C. Havasi, R. Speer, J. B. Alonso, ‘ConceptNet 3: a flexible, multilingual semantic network for common sense knowledge’, In proceedings of Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, 2007, pp. 27–29.
M. Keshavarz and Y.-H. Lee, ‘Ontology matching by using ConceptNet’, In: V. Kachitvichyanukul, H.T. Luong, and R. Pitakaso (eds) Proceedings of the Asia Pacific Industrial Engineering & Management Systems Conference, 2012, pp. 1917–1925, 2012.
R. Speer, J. Chin, C. Havasi, ‘ConceptNet 5.5: an open multilingual graph of general knowledge’, In Proceedings of the Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2017, pp. 4444–4451.
J. Guo, J. Gou, C. Wang and W. Luo, ‘The Normalized-PSO and Its Application in Attribute Weighted Optimal Problem’, 2016 Third International Conference on Trustworthy Systems and their Applications (TSA), Wuhan, China, 2016, pp. 48–53. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSA.2016.18.
S. S. Kundu, D. Sarkar, P. Jana, D. K. Kole, ‘Personalization in Education Using Recommendation System: An Overview’, In: Deyasi A, Mukherjee S, Mukherjee A, Bhattacharjee AK, Mondal A (eds) Computational Intelligence in Digital Pedagogy. Intelligent Systems Reference Library, vol. 197, 2021. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8744-3_5
N. B. A. Normadhi, L. Shuib, H. N. M. Nasir, A. Bimba, N. Idris, V. Balakrishnan, ‘Identification of personal traits in adaptive learning environment: Systematic literature review’, Computers & Education, Vol. 130, 2019, pp. 168–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.11.005
S. Ouf, M. Abd Ellatif, S. E. Salama, Y. Helmy, A proposed paradigm for smart learning environment based on semantic web’, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 72, 2017, pp. 796–818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.030
J. Wang, H. Xie, F. L. Wang, L. K. Lee, O. T. S. Au, ‘Top-N personalized recommendation with graph neural networks in MOOCs’, Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100010, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100010
D. Zou, M. Wang, H. Xie, G. Cheng, F. L. Wang, L. K. Lee, ‘A comparative study on linguistic theories for modeling EFL learners: facilitating personalized vocabulary learning via task recommendations’, Interactive Learning Environments, 1–13, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1789178
A. F. Martins, M. Machado, H. S. Bernardino, J. F. de Souza, ‘A comparative analysis of metaheuristics applied to adaptive curriculum sequencing’, Soft Computing, 25, 2021, 11019–11034. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-021-05836-9
X. Liu. ‘A collaborative filtering recommendation algorithm based on the influence sets of e-learning group’s behavior’, Cluster Computing 22, no. 2 (2019): 2823–2833. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-017-1560-6
J. Shu, X. Shen, H. Liu, B. Yi, Z. Zhang, ‘A content-based recommendation algorithm for learning resources’, Multimedia Systems, 24(2), 2018, pp. 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00530-017-0539-8
H. Ezaldeen, R. Misra, S. K. Bisoy, R. Alatrash, R. Priyadarshini, ‘A hybrid E-learning recommendation integrating adaptive profiling and sentiment analysis’, Journal of Web Semantics 72 (2022): 100700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2021.100700
S. Benzarti, & R. Faiz, ‘EgoTR: Personalized Tweets Recommendation Approach’, In: Silhavy R., Senkerik R., Oplatkova Z., Prokopova Z., Silhavy P. (eds) Intelligent Systems in Cybernetics and Automation Theory. CSOC 2015. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 348, 2015, pp. 227–238, Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18503-3_23
L. Boratto, S. Carta, G. Fenu, &R. Saia, ‘Semantics-aware content-based recommender systems: Design and architecture guidelines’, Neurocomputing 254 (2017): 79–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2016.10.079
M. Pennacchiotti, F. Silvestri, H. Vahabi, & R.Venturini, ‘Making your interests follow you on twitter’, In Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management, 2012, pp. 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1145/2396761.2396786
H. Jiang, Y. Xiao, & W. Wang, ‘Explaining a bag of words with hierarchical conceptual labels’, World Wide Web 23, 1693–1713 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11280-019-00752-3
W. Cui, Y. Du, Z. Shen, Y. Zhou,& J. Li, ‘Personalized microblog recommendation using sentimental features’, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Big Data and Smart Computing (BigComp), Jeju, 2017, pp. 455–456, doi: 10.1109/BIGCOMP.2017.7881756.
H. Ma, M. Jia, D. Zhang, & X. Lin, ‘Combining tag correlation and user social relation for microblog recommendation’, Information Sciences 385 (2017): 325–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2016.12.047
S. Auer, C. Bizer, G. Kobilarov, J. Lehmann, R. Cyganiak, & Z. Ives, ‘DBpedia: A Nucleus for a Web of Open Data’ In: Aberer K. et al. (eds) The Semantic Web. ISWC 2007, ASWC 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4825. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76298-0_52
G. A. Miller, ‘WordNet: a lexical database for English’, Communications of the ACM 38, no. 11 (1995): 39–41. https://doi.org/10.1145/219717.219748
D. Pla Karidi, Y. Stavrakas, & Y. Vassiliou, ‘Tweet and followee personalized recommendations based on knowledge graphs’, Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing 9, no. 6 (2018): 2035–2049. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-017-0491-7
F. Zarrinkalam, H. Fani, E. Bagheri, M. Kahani and W. Du, ‘Semantics-Enabled User Interest Detection from Twitter’, 2015 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT), Singapore, 2015, pp. 469–476, https://doi.org/10.1109/WI-IAT.2015.182.
G. Piao, ‘Towards Comprehensive User Modeling on the Social Web for Personalized Link Recommendations’, In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on User Modeling Adaptation and Personalization (UMAP ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, (2016), pp. 333–336. https://doi.org/10.1145/2930238.2930367
G. Piao, & J. G. Breslin, ‘User modeling on Twitter with WordNet Synsets and DBpedia concepts for personalized recommendations’, In proceedings of the 25th ACM international on conference on information and knowledge management, (2016), pp. 2057–2060. doi: 10.1145/2983323.2983908
F. Ilievski, A. Oltramari, K.Ma, B. Zhang, D.L.McGuinness, &P. Szekely, ‘Dimensions of commonsense knowledge’, arXiv: 2101.04640 (2021).