Prediction Model of Post-TAVR Complication Using a Medical Twin Web Navigator
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13052/jwe1540-9589.2274Keywords:
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), medical twin, web navigator, complication prediction modelAbstract
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been introduced as an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement for patients with severe aortic valve disease and is expanding into a universal treatment. However, complications after TAVR can have devastating consequences for patients and must be predicted. By designing a TAVR medical twin architecture based on real-world data (RWD), we can minimize complications and achieve optimal clinical outcomes through analysis and simulation results in a virtual environment that can predict complications. The simulation phase utilizes machine learning algorithms for complication prediction to predict patients with conduction abnormalities, a complication of TAVR, and provides the prediction results through a web-based monitoring system. We also conduct research to identify factors that influence complications, so that complication prediction in a virtualized environment on a medical twin architecture can serve as a guide for personalized care design for patients undergoing TAVR.
Downloads
References
Dowling, C., Kondapally Seshasai, S. R., Firoozi, S., and Brecker, S. J. (2020). Transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgery for symptomatic severe aortic stenosis: A reconstructed individual patient data meta-analysis. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 96(1), 158–166.
van Mourik M.S.J., Abdelghani M., et al. Guideline-defined futility or patient-reported outcomes to assess treatment success after TAVI: what to use? Results from a prospective cohort study with long-term follow-up. Open Heart 2018, 5(2), e000879.
Lebedev, A.V., et al. Random Forest ensembles for detection and prediction of Alzheimer’s disease with a good between-cohort robustness. NeuroImage: Clinical 2014, 6, 115–125.
Blaser, M.C., Atkins, S.K., Aikawa, E. Tissue Engineering to Study and Treat Cardiovascular Calcification. Tissue-Engineered Vascular Grafts 2020, 429–468.
Czarny, M.J., Resar, J.R. Diagnosis and Management of Valvular Aortic Stenosis. Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology 2014, CMC-S15716. [https://doi.org/10.4137/CMC.S15716].
Al-Ghonaim, M., Pannu, N. Prevention and treatment of contrast-induced nephropathy. Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology 2006, 9(2), 42–49.
Hanyu F., Takasaki K. Pancreatoduodenectomy. Springer: Tokyo, Japan 1997.
Wal, P., Rathore, S., Aziz, N., Singh, Y.K., Gupta, A. Aortic stenosis: a review on acquired pathogenesis and ominous combination with diabetes mellitus. The Egyptian Heart Journal 2023, 75(1), 1–17.
Baumgartner, H., Falk, V., Bax, J.J., De Bonis, M., Hamm, C., Holm, P.J., et al. 2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Kardiologia Polska (Polish Heart Journal) 2018, 76(1), 1–62.
Sinning, J.M., Vasa-Nicotera, M., Chin, D., Hammerstingl, C., Ghanem, A., Bence, J.,Werner, N. Evaluation and management of paravalvular aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2013, 62(1), 11–20.
Généreux, P., et al. Incidence, predictors, and prognostic impact of late bleeding complications after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2014, 64(24), 2605–2615.
Kapadia, S.R., et al. Stroke after surgical versus transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the PARTNER trial. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2018, 72(20), 2415–2426.
Sinning, J.M., et al. Renal function as predictor of mortality in patients after percutaneous transcatheter aortic valve implantation. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions 2010, 3(11), 1141–1149.
Auffret, V., et al. Conduction disturbances after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: current status and future perspectives. Circulation 2017, 136(11), 1049–1069.
Grube, E., Sinning, J.M. The “big five” complications after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: do we still have to be afraid of them?. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions 2019, 12(4), 370–372.
Regueiro, A., Abdul-Jawad Altisent, O., Del Trigo, M., et al. Impact of new-onset left bundle branch block and periprocedural permanent pacemaker implantation on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions 2016, 9(5), e003635.
Kamel Boulos, Maged N., and Peng Zhang. “Digital twins: from personalised medicine to precision public health.” Journal of personalized medicine 11.8 (2021): 745.
Armeni, Patrizio, et al. “Digital Twins for Health: Opportunities, Barriers and a Path Forward.” (2023).
ISHAQ, Abid, et al. Improving the prediction of heart failure patients’ survival using SMOTE and effective data mining techniques. IEEE access, 2021, 9, 39707–39716.
Chicco, Davide, and Giuseppe Jurman. “The advantages of the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) over F1 score and accuracy in binary classification evaluation.” BMC genomics 21.1 (2020): 1–13.
Grandini, Margherita, Enrico Bagli, and Giorgio Visani. “Metrics for multi-class classification: an overview.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.05756 (2020).
Jeong, Minsu, et al. “Ensemble Deep Learning Model using Random Forest for Patient Shock Detection.” KSII Transactions on Internet & Information Systems 17.4 (2023).
Truong, Vien T., et al. “Machine learning method for predicting pacemaker implantation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement.” Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology 44.2 (2021): 334–340.
Breiman, L. RandomForests.MachLearn. 2001, 45, 5–32.
Chirinos JA, Orlenko A, Zhao L, BassoMD, CvijicME, LiZ, et al. Multiple plasma biomarkers for risk stratification in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 202, 75, 1281–1295.
Shah, Adnan Muhammad, et al. “Examining different factors in web-based patients’ decision-making process: systematic review on digital platforms for clinical decision support system.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18.21 (2021): 11226.
