A Digital Grid Security Architecture Based on Quantum Key Interaction and Web Engineering for Distributed Energy Systems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13052/jwe1540-9589.2466Keywords:
Quantum key distribution (QKD), semantic web security, distributed energy resources (DER), smart grid cybersecurity, OWL ontology, federated access control, web engineeringAbstract
The modernization of distributed energy systems introduces complex cybersecurity challenges as grid infrastructures become increasingly digitized, decentralized, and web-connected. This paper presents a novel security architecture that integrates quantum key distribution (QKD) with semantic web technologies to provide end-to-end secure, scalable, and adaptive protection for distributed energy resource (DER) networks. The proposed framework features a modular system design, incorporating BB84-based QKD protocols for quantum-resilient key generation, a metadata-driven policy layer using OWL ontologies and SWRL reasoning, and a web interface for operator access and real-time monitoring. Extensive performance evaluation in a simulated multi-domain microgrid environment demonstrates that the system achieves an average key generation rate of 2.3 kbps with quantum bit error rate (QBER) maintained below 5.2% across 40 km optical links. Session establishment latency averaged 435 ms, 29.8% lower than a traditional TLS/PKI baseline, while semantic access validation achieved 100% accuracy in 42 adversarial test cases. These cases were evaluated using automated semantic validation scripts simulating spoofed roles, malformed sessions, and unauthorized requests. The system sustained encrypted throughput of 110 messages per second per node and maintained service continuity under quantum noise and cross-domain attack simulations. Usability trials with six engineers yielded a system usability scale (SUS) score of 88.3, and the average DER onboarding time was reduced from 10.1 to 5.5 minutes. These findings affirm that QKD-enhanced, semantically governed web architectures can provide strong cryptographic guarantees while supporting dynamic policy enforcement and intuitive user workflows. The proposed solution demonstrates a viable path for deploying future-proof security mechanisms in next-generation smart grid environments.
Downloads
References
Alshowkan, M., et al. (2022). Authentication of smart grid communications using quantum key distribution. Scientific Reports, 12, 12213.
Lu, Y., et al. (2024). Cybersecurity of distributed energy resource systems in the smart grid. Applied Energy, 350, 120000.
Zhou, Y., et al. (2022). Cybersecurity Considerations for Distributed Energy Resources on the U.S. Electric Grid. U.S. DOE Report.
Wang, Y., et al. (2021). A review of quantum key distribution protocols in the perspective of smart grid communication security. Future Internet, 13(2), 28.
Sectrio (2022). Securing Distributed Energy Resources on Power Grids. Sectrio Blog.
Mitchell, S., et al. (2023). Design of Distributed Energy Resource Cybersecurity Certification Programs. Sandia National Labs Report.
Evans, P. G., et al. (2025). Quantum Key Distribution Applicability to Smart Grid Cybersecurity Systems. Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
Prateek, A., et al. (2025). Exploring QKD protocols for secure smart grid communications. Journal of Reliable and Trustworthy Computing Systems, 13(2), 45–60.
NIST (2023). Securing Distributed Energy Resources: An Example of IIoT Cybersecurity. NIST SP 1800-32.
NHSJS Editorial Board (2025). Quantum Cryptography: A Review of the Literature. National High School Journal of Science.
Li, X., et al. (2021). Implementation of BB84 in Smart Substation Communication. Energies, 14(13), 3982.
Wang, Q., et al. (2023). QKD Integration in Field Grid Networks. IET Smart Grid, 6(1), 56–66.
Zhang, H., et al. (2022). Microgrid Testbed for QKD Simulation. Sensors, 22(14), 5081.
Perri, C., et al. (2021). Energy Semantic Data Management and Utilization in Smart Grid. Proc. Intl. Conf. Smart Energy Systems.
Pritoni, M., et al. (2021). Metadata schemas and ontologies for building energy applications. Energies, 14(7), 2024.
Barnett, J. (2011). A Semantic Model for Cyber Security. GridWise Architecture Council.
Crapo, A. (2011). The Smart Grid as a Semantically Enabled Internet of Things. GridWise Architecture Council.
Offis E.V. (2013). Towards a standard-compliant Smart Grid using Semantic Web Technologies. OFFIS Technical Report.
Zhou, F., et al. (2022). Semantics-Enhanced Grid State Monitoring. IEEE Access, 10, 88134–88148.
Almeida, J., et al. (2023). Semantic Models for DER Communication. MDPI Sensors, 23(4), 1772.
National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) (2025). Cybersecurity Standards for DER. NREL White Paper.
Sadeghi, A. R., et al. (2020). Security and Privacy in Smart Grids. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 22(1), 195–238.
Zhang, Y., et al. (2022). Integration Challenges of QKD in IoT. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 9(3), 1923–1935.
Ren, L., et al. (2021). Secure PKI alternatives for IoT Grid Applications. Future Generation Computer Systems, 118, 168–179.
Nguyen, T., et al. (2023). Quantum-resilient cryptography for embedded systems. IEEE Trans. Industrial Informatics, 19(2), 1755–1766.
Li, M., et al. (2021). Secure Cross-Domain Key Management in Cloud-based DER. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 12(1), 411–423.
Yoon, S., et al. (2020). A Survey on Federated Identity for Smart Grids. Journal of Grid Computing, 18(1), 1–17.
Gómez, J., et al. (2022). Coordinated DER Control with Ontology-Based Reasoning. IEEE Access, 10, 112223–112236.
