A Semantic-Web-Driven Visualization and Fault-Reasoning Framework for Circuit-Oriented Systems

Authors

  • Liu Yin Nanjing NARI Cyber Security Technology Co. Ltd., Nanjing 210000, Jiangsu, China
  • Zhang Nanjing Nanjing NARI Cyber Security Technology Co. Ltd., Nanjing 210000, Jiangsu, China
  • Zheng Qiang Nanjing NARI Cyber Security Technology Co. Ltd., Nanjing 210000, Jiangsu, China
  • Tang Yadong Nanjing NARI Cyber Security Technology Co. Ltd., Nanjing 210000, Jiangsu, China
  • Song Fuping Nanjing NARI Cyber Security Technology Co. Ltd., Nanjing 210000, Jiangsu, China
  • Li Senwei Nanjing NARI Cyber Security Technology Co. Ltd., Nanjing 210000, Jiangsu, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13052/jwe1540-9589.2554

Keywords:

Ontology-based reasoning, SWRL inference, real-time semantic system, Adaptive caching, explainable AI, edge analytics

Abstract

Efficient and explainable reasoning over dynamic, heterogeneous data remains a key challenge for intelligent diagnostic and monitoring systems. This paper presents a unified semantic-web-based framework that integrates ontology modeling, rule-driven inference, and interactive visualization into a scalable, service-oriented architecture. The proposed system couples Web Ontology Language (OWL)-based knowledge representation with dynamic Semantic Web Rule Language (SWRL) rule execution and control-theoretic feedback, forming a closed-loop semantic reasoning cycle that continuously refines ontology and rule parameters. To ensure real-time performance, the framework employs parallelized rule evaluation, adaptive caching, and incremental inference across distributed reasoning nodes. A modular semantic query interface bridges reasoning and visualization layers, enabling transparent inspection of causal relationships and human-in-the-loop knowledge refinement. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed system achieves sub-linear latency growth with ontology size, reduces inference delay by up to 56% through indexing-caching synergy, and maintains detection accuracy above 95% under complex fault conditions. The end-to-end latency remains below 300 ms for medium-scale ontologies, validating its suitability for real-time diagnostic, telepresence, and edge-analytics applications. These findings establish a novel synthesis between symbolic reasoning and adaptive system control, offering both computational efficiency and semantic interpretability for circuit-oriented and cyber-physical diagnostic systems, while providing a foundation that may be extended to other semantic reasoning domains.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Liu Yin, Nanjing NARI Cyber Security Technology Co. Ltd., Nanjing 210000, Jiangsu, China

Liu Yin obtained a Bachelor of Engineering degree in Electronic Information from Nanjing Normal University, China, in 2008, and a Master of Engineering degree in Software Engineering from Nanjing University in 2017. He currently serves as the Technical Director of Nanjing NARI Network Security Technology Co. Ltd., with research interests including the construction of network security protection systems for power monitoring systems, safety risk assessment, and hidden danger investigation and rectification. He also acts as a Corporate Tutor for Master’s Students at Xiamen University.

Zhang Nanjing, Nanjing NARI Cyber Security Technology Co. Ltd., Nanjing 210000, Jiangsu, China

Zhang Nanjing received a Bachelor of Science degree from Nanjing University, China, in 2008, and a Master of Engineering degree in Software Engineering from Nankai University in 2015. He is currently the General Manager of Nanjing NARI Network Security Technology Co. Ltd., focusing on research areas such as network security in power dispatching, situation awareness, and cryptographic application.

Zheng Qiang, Nanjing NARI Cyber Security Technology Co. Ltd., Nanjing 210000, Jiangsu, China

Zheng Qiang earned a Bachelor of Engineering degree in Software Engineering from Binjiang College of Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, China, in 2014. He now works as a Product Manager at Nanjing NARI Network Security Technology Co. Ltd., with research fields including industrial control vulnerability mining, source code audit, reverse engineering analysis, and commercial cryptography application security evaluation.

Tang Yadong, Nanjing NARI Cyber Security Technology Co. Ltd., Nanjing 210000, Jiangsu, China

Tang Yadong obtained a Bachelor of Engineering degree in Mechanical Design, Manufacturing and Automation from Nanjing Forestry University, China, in 2013. He currently holds the position of Project Supervisor at Nanjing NARI Network Security Technology Co. Ltd., specializing in research on network security protection systems for power monitoring systems and network security level protection technology.

Song Fuping, Nanjing NARI Cyber Security Technology Co. Ltd., Nanjing 210000, Jiangsu, China

Song Fuping received a Bachelor of Engineering degree in Automation from Hohai University, China, in 2021. He is currently an Engineering Consulting Engineer at Nanjing NARI Network Security Technology Co. Ltd., with research interests covering commercial cryptography application security evaluation, offensive and defensive penetration, and industrial control security.

Li Senwei, Nanjing NARI Cyber Security Technology Co. Ltd., Nanjing 210000, Jiangsu, China

Li Senwei obtained a Bachelor of Engineering degree in Electrical Engineering and Automation from Chengxian College of Southeast University, China, in 2020, and a Master of Engineering degree in Electronic Information from Nanjing Tech University in 2023. He now serves as an Engineering Consulting Engineer at Nanjing NARI Network Security Technology Co. Ltd., focusing on research areas such as industrial control security, penetration analysis, and network security emergency drills.

References

J. Lee, B. Bagheri, and H. A. Kao. A cyber-physical systems architecture for Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manufacturing Letters, 3:18–23, 2015.

L. Monostori. Cyber-physical production systems: Roots, expectations and R&D challenges. Procedia CIRP, 17:9–13, 2014.

W. Zhang, D. Yang, and H. Wang. Data-driven methods for predictive maintenance of industrial equipment: A survey. IEEE Systems Journal, 13(3):2213–2227, 2019.

P. Malhotra, L. Vig, G. Shroff, and P. Agarwal. Long short-term memory networks for anomaly detection in time series. In Proceedings of ESANN, 89–94, 2015.

F. Doshi-Velez and B. Kim. Towards a rigorous science of interpretable machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.08608, 2017.

D. Gunning, M. Stefik, J. Choi, T. Miller, S. Stumpf, and G. Z. Yang. XAI – Explainable artificial intelligence. AI Magazine, 40(2):44–58, 2019.

I. Horrocks, P. F. Patel-Schneider, and F. Van Harmelen. From SHIQ to OWL: The making of a Web ontology language. Journal of Web Semantics, 1(1):7–26, 2003.

F. Baader, I. Horrocks, and U. Sattler. Description logics as ontology languages for the Semantic Web. In Mechanizing Mathematical Reasoning, 228–248. Springer, 2005.

A. I. Maarala, X. Su, and J. Riekki. Semantic reasoning for context-aware Internet of Things applications. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing, 4(4):461–473, 2016.

A. I. Maarala, X. Su, and J. Riekki. Semantic data provisioning and reasoning for the Internet of Things. In Proceedings of UCAmI, 1–10, 2014.

C. H. Liu, K. L. Chang, J. J. Y. Chen, and S. C. Hung. Ontology-based context representation and reasoning using OWL and SWRL. In Proceedings of CNSR, 215–220, 2010.

K. Dentler, R. Cornet, A. Ten Teije, and N. De Keizer. Comparison of reasoners for large ontologies in the OWL 2 EL profile. Semantic Web, 2(2):71–87, 2011.

G. Singh, S. Bhatia, and R. Mutharaju. OWL2Bench: A benchmark for OWL 2 reasoners. In Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), 81–96, 2020.

B. Motik, B. C. Grau, I. Horrocks, Z. Wu, A. Fokoue, and C. Lutz. OWL 2 Web Ontology Language profiles. W3C Recommendation, 2012.

Y. K. Penya, J. C. Nieves, A. Espinoza, C. E. Borges, A. Pena, and M. Ortega. A distributed semantic architecture for smart grids. Energies, 5(11):4824–4843, 2012.

Z. Liu, Z. Feng, X. Zhang, X. Wang, and G. Rao. RORS: Enhanced rule-based OWL reasoning on Spark. arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.02824, 2016.

D. F. Barbieri, D. Braga, S. Ceri, E. D. Valle, and M. Grossniklaus. C-SPARQL: A continuous query language for RDF data streams. In Proceedings of WWW, 1061–1062, 2010.

D. Le-Phuoc, M. Dao-Tran, J. X. Parreira, and M. Hauswirth. A native and adaptive approach for unified processing of linked streams and linked data. In Proceedings of ISWC, 370–388, 2011.

M. Bourgais, F. Giustozzi, and L. Vercouter. Detecting situations with stream reasoning on health data obtained with IoT. Procedia Computer Science, 192:507–516, 2021.

D. Keim, G. Andrienko, J. D. Fekete, C. Görg, J. Kohlhammer, and G. Melançon. Visual analytics: Definition, process, and challenges. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 28(5):20–31, 2008.

C. Ware. Information Visualization: Perception for Design. 3rd ed. Morgan Kaufmann, 2013.

L. Petnga and M. Austin. An ontological framework for knowledge modeling and decision support in cyber-physical systems. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 30(1):77–94, 2016.

R. Reda, A. Carbonaro, V. de Boer, R. Siebes, R. van der Weerdt, B. Nouwt, and L. Daniele. Supporting smart home scenarios using OWL and SWRL. Sensors, 22(8):3022, 2022.

L. Silva-Munoz, K. Medina, M. Marsicano, and M. Bonjour. Reasoning on the Semantic Web for adaptive hypermedia. Journal of Web Engineering, 7(2):148–165, 2008.

Y. Kazakov. Consequence-driven reasoning for Horn SHIQ ontologies. In Proceedings of IJCAI, 2040–2045, 2009.

B. C. Grau, I. Horrocks, Y. Kazakov, and U. Sattler. Modular reuse of ontologies: Theory and practice. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 31:273–318, 2008.

H. Stuckenschmidt and M. Klein. Structure-based partitioning of large concept hierarchies. Journal of Web Semantics, 2(1):33–44, 2004.

J.-P. Calbimonte. Ontology-based access to sensor data streams. In Proceedings of ISWC, 23–38, 2012.

A. Lawan and A. Rakib. The Semantic Web Rule Language expressiveness extensions: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.11723, 2019.

N. D. Rodríguez, M. P. Cuéllar, J. Lilius, and M. D. Calvo-Flores. A fuzzy ontology for semantic modelling and recognition of human behavior. Knowledge-Based Systems, 66:46–60, 2014.

J. Urbani, S. Kotoulas, E. Oren, and F. Van Harmelen. Scalable distributed reasoning using MapReduce. In Proceedings of ISWC, 634–649, 2010.

A. d’Avila Garcez, T. R. Besold, L. De Raedt, P. Földiak, et al. Neural-symbolic learning and reasoning: Contributions and challenges. In AAAI Spring Symposium, 1–8, 2015.

P. Hitzler and M. K. Sarker, editors. Neuro-symbolic Artificial Intelligence: The State of the Art. IOS Press, 2022.

K. Ryabinin and S. Chuprina. Ontology-driven edge computing. Frontiers in Physics, 8:112, 2020.

W. Shi, J. Cao, Q. Zhang, Y. Li, and L. Xu. Edge computing: Vision and challenges. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 3(5):637–646, 2016.

A. Soularidis, K. I. Kotis, and G. A. Vouros. Real-time semantic data integration and reasoning in life- and time-critical systems. Electronics, 13(3):526, 2024.

W. Xu, Z. Yang, D. W. K. Ng, M. Levorato, Y. C. Eldar, and M. Debbah. Edge learning for B5G networks with distributed signal processing: Semantic communication, edge computing, and wireless sensing. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 17(1):9–39, 2023.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-06

How to Cite

Yin, L. ., Nanjing, Z. ., Qiang, Z. ., Yadong, T. ., Fuping, S. ., & Senwei, L. . (2026). A Semantic-Web-Driven Visualization and Fault-Reasoning Framework for Circuit-Oriented Systems. Journal of Web Engineering, 25(05), 823–860. https://doi.org/10.13052/jwe1540-9589.2554

Issue

Section

Advanced Practice in Web Engineering in Asia