A Semantic-Web-Driven Visualization and Fault-Reasoning Framework for Circuit-Oriented Systems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13052/jwe1540-9589.2554Keywords:
Ontology-based reasoning, SWRL inference, real-time semantic system, Adaptive caching, explainable AI, edge analyticsAbstract
Efficient and explainable reasoning over dynamic, heterogeneous data remains a key challenge for intelligent diagnostic and monitoring systems. This paper presents a unified semantic-web-based framework that integrates ontology modeling, rule-driven inference, and interactive visualization into a scalable, service-oriented architecture. The proposed system couples Web Ontology Language (OWL)-based knowledge representation with dynamic Semantic Web Rule Language (SWRL) rule execution and control-theoretic feedback, forming a closed-loop semantic reasoning cycle that continuously refines ontology and rule parameters. To ensure real-time performance, the framework employs parallelized rule evaluation, adaptive caching, and incremental inference across distributed reasoning nodes. A modular semantic query interface bridges reasoning and visualization layers, enabling transparent inspection of causal relationships and human-in-the-loop knowledge refinement. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed system achieves sub-linear latency growth with ontology size, reduces inference delay by up to 56% through indexing-caching synergy, and maintains detection accuracy above 95% under complex fault conditions. The end-to-end latency remains below 300 ms for medium-scale ontologies, validating its suitability for real-time diagnostic, telepresence, and edge-analytics applications. These findings establish a novel synthesis between symbolic reasoning and adaptive system control, offering both computational efficiency and semantic interpretability for circuit-oriented and cyber-physical diagnostic systems, while providing a foundation that may be extended to other semantic reasoning domains.
Downloads
References
J. Lee, B. Bagheri, and H. A. Kao. A cyber-physical systems architecture for Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manufacturing Letters, 3:18–23, 2015.
L. Monostori. Cyber-physical production systems: Roots, expectations and R&D challenges. Procedia CIRP, 17:9–13, 2014.
W. Zhang, D. Yang, and H. Wang. Data-driven methods for predictive maintenance of industrial equipment: A survey. IEEE Systems Journal, 13(3):2213–2227, 2019.
P. Malhotra, L. Vig, G. Shroff, and P. Agarwal. Long short-term memory networks for anomaly detection in time series. In Proceedings of ESANN, 89–94, 2015.
F. Doshi-Velez and B. Kim. Towards a rigorous science of interpretable machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.08608, 2017.
D. Gunning, M. Stefik, J. Choi, T. Miller, S. Stumpf, and G. Z. Yang. XAI – Explainable artificial intelligence. AI Magazine, 40(2):44–58, 2019.
I. Horrocks, P. F. Patel-Schneider, and F. Van Harmelen. From SHIQ to OWL: The making of a Web ontology language. Journal of Web Semantics, 1(1):7–26, 2003.
F. Baader, I. Horrocks, and U. Sattler. Description logics as ontology languages for the Semantic Web. In Mechanizing Mathematical Reasoning, 228–248. Springer, 2005.
A. I. Maarala, X. Su, and J. Riekki. Semantic reasoning for context-aware Internet of Things applications. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing, 4(4):461–473, 2016.
A. I. Maarala, X. Su, and J. Riekki. Semantic data provisioning and reasoning for the Internet of Things. In Proceedings of UCAmI, 1–10, 2014.
C. H. Liu, K. L. Chang, J. J. Y. Chen, and S. C. Hung. Ontology-based context representation and reasoning using OWL and SWRL. In Proceedings of CNSR, 215–220, 2010.
K. Dentler, R. Cornet, A. Ten Teije, and N. De Keizer. Comparison of reasoners for large ontologies in the OWL 2 EL profile. Semantic Web, 2(2):71–87, 2011.
G. Singh, S. Bhatia, and R. Mutharaju. OWL2Bench: A benchmark for OWL 2 reasoners. In Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), 81–96, 2020.
B. Motik, B. C. Grau, I. Horrocks, Z. Wu, A. Fokoue, and C. Lutz. OWL 2 Web Ontology Language profiles. W3C Recommendation, 2012.
Y. K. Penya, J. C. Nieves, A. Espinoza, C. E. Borges, A. Pena, and M. Ortega. A distributed semantic architecture for smart grids. Energies, 5(11):4824–4843, 2012.
Z. Liu, Z. Feng, X. Zhang, X. Wang, and G. Rao. RORS: Enhanced rule-based OWL reasoning on Spark. arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.02824, 2016.
D. F. Barbieri, D. Braga, S. Ceri, E. D. Valle, and M. Grossniklaus. C-SPARQL: A continuous query language for RDF data streams. In Proceedings of WWW, 1061–1062, 2010.
D. Le-Phuoc, M. Dao-Tran, J. X. Parreira, and M. Hauswirth. A native and adaptive approach for unified processing of linked streams and linked data. In Proceedings of ISWC, 370–388, 2011.
M. Bourgais, F. Giustozzi, and L. Vercouter. Detecting situations with stream reasoning on health data obtained with IoT. Procedia Computer Science, 192:507–516, 2021.
D. Keim, G. Andrienko, J. D. Fekete, C. Görg, J. Kohlhammer, and G. Melançon. Visual analytics: Definition, process, and challenges. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 28(5):20–31, 2008.
C. Ware. Information Visualization: Perception for Design. 3rd ed. Morgan Kaufmann, 2013.
L. Petnga and M. Austin. An ontological framework for knowledge modeling and decision support in cyber-physical systems. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 30(1):77–94, 2016.
R. Reda, A. Carbonaro, V. de Boer, R. Siebes, R. van der Weerdt, B. Nouwt, and L. Daniele. Supporting smart home scenarios using OWL and SWRL. Sensors, 22(8):3022, 2022.
L. Silva-Munoz, K. Medina, M. Marsicano, and M. Bonjour. Reasoning on the Semantic Web for adaptive hypermedia. Journal of Web Engineering, 7(2):148–165, 2008.
Y. Kazakov. Consequence-driven reasoning for Horn SHIQ ontologies. In Proceedings of IJCAI, 2040–2045, 2009.
B. C. Grau, I. Horrocks, Y. Kazakov, and U. Sattler. Modular reuse of ontologies: Theory and practice. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 31:273–318, 2008.
H. Stuckenschmidt and M. Klein. Structure-based partitioning of large concept hierarchies. Journal of Web Semantics, 2(1):33–44, 2004.
J.-P. Calbimonte. Ontology-based access to sensor data streams. In Proceedings of ISWC, 23–38, 2012.
A. Lawan and A. Rakib. The Semantic Web Rule Language expressiveness extensions: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.11723, 2019.
N. D. Rodríguez, M. P. Cuéllar, J. Lilius, and M. D. Calvo-Flores. A fuzzy ontology for semantic modelling and recognition of human behavior. Knowledge-Based Systems, 66:46–60, 2014.
J. Urbani, S. Kotoulas, E. Oren, and F. Van Harmelen. Scalable distributed reasoning using MapReduce. In Proceedings of ISWC, 634–649, 2010.
A. d’Avila Garcez, T. R. Besold, L. De Raedt, P. Földiak, et al. Neural-symbolic learning and reasoning: Contributions and challenges. In AAAI Spring Symposium, 1–8, 2015.
P. Hitzler and M. K. Sarker, editors. Neuro-symbolic Artificial Intelligence: The State of the Art. IOS Press, 2022.
K. Ryabinin and S. Chuprina. Ontology-driven edge computing. Frontiers in Physics, 8:112, 2020.
W. Shi, J. Cao, Q. Zhang, Y. Li, and L. Xu. Edge computing: Vision and challenges. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 3(5):637–646, 2016.
A. Soularidis, K. I. Kotis, and G. A. Vouros. Real-time semantic data integration and reasoning in life- and time-critical systems. Electronics, 13(3):526, 2024.
W. Xu, Z. Yang, D. W. K. Ng, M. Levorato, Y. C. Eldar, and M. Debbah. Edge learning for B5G networks with distributed signal processing: Semantic communication, edge computing, and wireless sensing. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 17(1):9–39, 2023.

