ORGANIZING INFORMATION IN MEDICAL BLOGS USING A HYBRID TAXONOMY-FOLKSONOMY APPROACH
Keywords:Web-Based Systems, Medical Blogs, Folksonomy, Taxonomy
The retrieval of health-related information from medical blogs is challenging, primarily because these blogs lack a systematic method to organize their posts. This paper investigated the application of a hybrid taxonomy-folksonomy approach in medical blogs by reviewing the existing approaches that apply the hybrid taxonomy-folksonomy structure in web-based systems. The review showed that the hybrid structure was promising for enhanced classification of resources in web-based systems; particularly in a specific type of medical blog known as a physician-written blog. However, further research is needed to truly identify the long-term impact of the hybrid structure and its benefit in achieving a better organization of other categories of medical blogs.
Witteman, H. and L. O’Grady. E-health in the era of web 2.0. in Proceedings of the Virtually
Informed: The Internet as (new) Health Information Sources, Final Conference of the Project
Virtually Informed—The Internet in the Medical Field, The University of Vienna, Vienna,
Meier, C.A., M.C. Fitzgerald, and J.M. Smith, eHealth: extending, enhancing, and evolving
healthcare. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 2013. 15: p. 359-382.
Allen, M., Tim O’Reilly and Web 2.0: the economics of memetic liberty and control.
Communication, Politics & Culture, 2009. 42(2): p. 6-23.
Cheung, K.-H., et al., HCLS 2.0/3.0: health care and life sciences data mashup using Web 2.0/3.0.
Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 2008. 41(5): p. 694-705.
Giustini, D., How Web 2.0 is changing medicine. BMJ, 2006. 333(7582): p. 1283-1284.
Weitzel, M., et al., A Web 2.0 model for patient-centered health informatics applications.
Computer, 2010. 43(7): p. 43-50.
Boulos, M.N.K. and S. Wheeler, The emerging Web 2.0 social software: an enabling suite of
sociable technologies in health and health care education. Health Information & Libraries Journal,
24(1): p. 2-23.
Pittler, M., et al., Evidence-based medicine and Web 2.0: friend or foe? The British Journal of
General Practice, 2011. 61(585): p. 302.
Bottles, K., Patients, doctors and health 2.0 tools. Physician Executive, 2009. 35(4): p. 22-5.
Afzal, M., et al. Social media canonicalization in healthcare: Smart cdss as an exemplary
application. in e-Health Networking, Applications and Services (Healthcom), 2012 IEEE 14th
International Conference on. 2012. Beijing, China: IEEE.
Murray, P., Web 2.0 and social technologies: what might they offer for the future of health
informatics. Health Care and Informatics Review Online, 2008. 12(2): p. 5-16.
Miller, E.A. and A. Pole, Diagnosis blog: checking up on health blogs in the blogosphere.
American Journal of Public Health, 2010. 100(8): p. 1514-1519.
Rozenblum, R. and D.W. Bates, Patient-centred healthcare, social media and the internet: the
perfect storm? BMJ Quality & Safety, 2013. 22(3): p. 183-186.
Denecke, K. Accessing medical experiences and information. in European Conference on
Artificial Intelligence, Workshop on Mining Social Data. 2008.
Lagu, T., et al., Content of weblogs written by health professionals. Journal of General Internal
Medicine, 2008. 23(10): p. 1642-1646.
Moorhead, S.A., et al., A new dimension of health care: systematic review of the uses, benefits,
and limitations of social media for health communication. Journal of medical Internet research,
Denecke, K. and A. Stewart, Learning from Medical Social Media Data: Current State and Future
Challenges, in Social Media Tools and Platforms in Learning Environments, B. White, I. King,
and P. Tsang, Editors. 2011, Springer Berlin Heidelberg. p. 353-372.
Fernandez-Luque, L., R. Karlsen, and J. Bonander, Review of extracting information from the
social web for health personalization. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2011. 13(1).
Kim, S., Content analysis of cancer blog posts. Journal of the Medical Library Association:
JMLA, 2009. 97(4): p. 260-266.
Gavgani, V.Z. and V.V. Mohan, Application of Web 2.0 tools in medical librarianship to support
medicine 2.0. Webology, 2008. 5(1).
Sommaruga, L., P. Rota, and N. Catenazzi, “Tagsonomy”: Easy Access to Web Sites through a
Combination of Taxonomy and Folksonomy, in Advances in Intelligent Web Mastering – 3, E.
Mugellini, et al., Editors. 2011, Springer Berlin Heidelberg. p. 61-71.
Nielsen, J. and H. Loranger, Prioritizing Web Usability. 2006, Berkeley CA: New Riders Press.
Denecke, K. and W. Nejdl, How valuable is medical social media data? Content analysis of the
medical web. Information Sciences, 2009. 179(12): p. 1870-1880.
Denecke, K. Assessing content diversity in medical weblogs. in First International Workshop on
Living Web, collocated with the 8th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2009). 2009.
Washington, D.C, USA: CEUR-WS.
Wagner, L., R. Paquin, and S. Persky, Genetics blogs as a public health tool: assessing credibility
and influence. Public health genomics, 2012. 15(3-4): p. 218-225.
Greenberg, S., E. Yaari, and J. BarIlan, Perceived credibility of blogs on the internet – the
influence of age on the extent of criticism. Aslib Proceedings, 2013. 65(1): p. 4-18.
Lee, S.-F. and W.-J. Jih, Exploring the effects of blog visit experience on relationship quality: an
empirical investigation with a cardiac surgery medical blog site. International Journal of EBusiness
Research (IJEBR), 2012. 8(2): p. 1-14.
Passant, A. Using ontologies to strengthen folksonomies and enrich information retrieval in
weblogs. in Proceedings of International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. 2007.
Boulder, CO, USA.
Pak, R., S. Pautz, and R. Iden, Information organization and retrieval: A comparison of
taxonomical and tagging systems. Cognitive Technology, 2007. 12(1): p. 31-44.
Perry, P.B., et al. Leveraging a Technical Domain Taxonomy to Enhance Collaboration
Knowledge Sharing and Operational Support. in SPE Digital Energy Conference and Exhibition.
The Woodlands, Texas, USA: Society of Petroleum Engineers.
Golder, S.A. and B.A. Huberman, Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems. Journal of
Information Science, 2006. 32(2): p. 198-208.
Macgregor, G. and E. McCulloch, Collaborative tagging as a knowledge organisation and
resource discovery tool. Library Review, 2006. 55(5): p. 291-300.
Kiu, C.C. and E. Tsui, TaxoFolk: a hybrid taxonomy–folksonomy structure for knowledge
classification and navigation. Expert Systems with Applications, 2011. 38(5): p. 6049-6058.
Sommaruga, L., P. Rota, and N. Catenazzi, “Tagsonomy”: Easy Access to Web Sites through a
Combination of Taxonomy and Folksonomy. Advances in Intelligent Web Mastering–3, 2011: p.
Spiteri, L.F., The structure and form of folksonomy tags: the road to the public library catalog.
Information Technology and Libraries, 2013. 26(3): p. 13-25.
Choi, Y. Enhancing Access to the Web: Vocabulary Analysis on Users’ Tags and Professionals’
Index Terms. in Poster presented at iConference. 2010. Champaign, IL, USA.
Vander Wal, T. Folksonomy definition and Wikipedia. 2005 [cited 2009 29 December ];
Available from: http://www.vanderwal.net/random/entrysel.php?blog=1750.
Zauder, K., J.L. Lazic, and M.B. Zorica. Collaborative Tagging Supported Knowledge Discovery.
in Information Technology Interfaces, 2007. ITI 2007. 29th International Conference on. 2007.
McFadden, S. and J.V. Weidenbenner, Collaborative tagging: traditional cataloging meets the
“wisdom of crowds”. The Serials Librarian, 2010. 58(1-4): p. 55-60.
Zubiaga, A., Enhancing navigation on Wikipedia with social tags. arXiv preprint
Apse, D. and T. Ley, Collaborative Tagging Applications and Capabilities in Social Technologies,
in Open and Social Technologies for Networked Learning, T. Ley, et al., Editors. 2013, Springer
Berlin Heidelberg. p. 185-188.
Wang, J., et al., Personalization of tagging systems. Information Processing & Management, 2010.
(1): p. 58-70.
Zeng, D. and H. Li, How useful are tags?—an empirical analysis of collaborative tagging for Web
page recommendation. Intelligence and Security Informatics, 2008: p. 320-330.
Jäschke, R., et al., Challenges in Tag Recommendations for Collaborative Tagging Systems, in
Recommender Systems for the Social Web. 2012, Springer Berlin Heidelberg. p. 65-87.
Nov, O. and C. Ye, Why do people tag?: motivations for photo tagging. Communications of the
ACM, 2010. 53(7): p. 128-131.
Ding, Y., et al., Upper tag ontology for integrating social tagging data. Journal of the American
Society for Information Science and Technology, 2010. 61(3): p. 505-521.
Avery, J.M., The democratization of metadata: collective tagging, folksonomies and Web 2.0.
Library Student Journal, 2010. 5.
Mulatiningsih, B., Collaborative tagging in participatory webs: the death of information
organisation? Asia Pacific Journal of Library and Information Science, 2012. 2(2): p. 108-116.
Peters, I., et al., Retrieval effectiveness of tagging systems. Proceedings of the American Society
for Information Science and Technology, 2011. 48(1): p. 1-4.
Thomas, M., D.M. Caudle, and C.M. Schmitz, To tag or not to tag? Library Hi Tech, 2009. 27(3):
Mathes, A., Folksonomies-cooperative classification and communication through shared
metadata. Computer Mediated Communication, 2004. 47(10).
Kim, H.L., S. Decker, and J.G. Breslin, Representing and sharing folksonomies with semantics.
Journal of Information Science, 2010. 36(1): p. 57-72.
Fichter, D., Intranet applications for tagging and folksonomies. Online, 2006. 30(3): p. 43-45.
Begelman, G., P. Keller, and F. Smadja. Automated tag clustering: Improving search and
exploration in the tag space. in Collaborative Web Tagging Workshop at WWW2006, Edinburgh,
Shirky, C. Ontology is overrated: categories, links, and tags. Clay Shirky's Internet Writings,
Derntl, M., et al., Inclusive social tagging and its support in Web 2.0 services. Computers in
Human Behavior, 2011. 27(4): p. 1460-1466.
Cantador, I., I. Konstas, and J.M. Jose, Categorising social tags to improve folksonomy-based
recommendations. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 2011.
(1): p. 1-15.
Trant, J., Studying social tagging and folksonomy: a review and framework. Journal of Digital
Information, 2009. 10(1).
Qingfeng, L. and S.C.Y. Lu, Collaborative Tagging Applications and Approaches. MultiMedia,
IEEE, 2008. 15(3): p. 14-21.
Passant, A., J.G. Breslin, and S. Decker, a URI is worth a thousand tags. International Journal on
Semantic Web and Information Systems, 2009. 5(3): p. 71-94.
Wetzker, R., et al., I tag, you tag: translating tags for advanced user models, in Proceedings of the
third ACM international conference on Web search and data mining2010, ACM: New York, New
York, USA. p. 71-80.
Dattolo, A., D. Eynard, and L. Mazzola, An integrated approach to discover tag semantics, in
Proceedings of the 2011 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing2011, ACM: TaiChung,
Taiwan. p. 814-820.
Beldjoudi, S., H. Seridi, and C. Faron-Zucker. Ambiguity in tagging and the community effect in
researching relevant resources in folksonomies. in Proceedings of International Workshop User
Profile Data on the Social Semantic Web. 2011. Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
Marchetti, A., et al. Semkey: a semantic collaborative tagging system. in Workshop on Tagging
and Metadata for Social Information Organization at WWW 2007. 2007. Banff, Canada.
Noruzi, A., Folksonomies-Why do we need controlled vocabulary? Webology, 2007. 4(2).
Lu, C., J.-R. Park, and X. Hu, User tags versus expert-assigned subject terms: A comparison of
LibraryThing tags and Library of Congress Subject Headings. Journal of Information Science,
36(6): p. 763-779.
Alemneh, D.G. and A. Rorissa, Empowering digital libraries users through combining taxonomies
with folksonomies. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and
Technology, 2012. 49(1): p. 1-3.
Spiteri, L., User-Generated Metadata: Boon or Bust for Indexing and Controlled Vocabularies?, in
Indexing Society of Canada2013: Nova Scotia Trunk 3, Halifax, Canada.
Beatch, R. and P. Wlodarczyk. Hybrid approaches to taxonomy & folksonomy. in Semantic
Technology Conference 2009. 2009. San Jose, CA, USA.
Batch, Y., M.M. Yusof, and S.A. Noah, ICDTag: A Prototype for a Web-Based System for
Organizing Physician-Written Blog Posts Using a Hybrid Taxonomy-Folksonomy Approach.
Journal of medical Internet research, 2013. 15(2).
Hayman, S. and N. Lothian. Taxonomy directed folksonomies. in New Developments in Social
Bookmarking, Ark Group Conference: Developing and Improving Classification Schemes. 2007.
Sydney, Australia: Citeseer.
Quintarelli, E., A. Resmini, and L. Rosati, Information architecture: Facetag: integrating bottomup
and top-down classification in a social tagging system. Bulletin of the American Society for
Information Science and Technology, 2007. 33(5): p. 10-15.