USING CONTEXT TO SUPPORT EFFECTIVE APPLICATION OF WEB CONTENT ACCESSIBILITY GUIDELINES

Authors

  • DAVID SLOAN Digital Media Access Group, University of Dundee, UK
  • BRIAN KELLY UKOLN, University of Bath, UK
  • HELEN PETRIE Department of Computing Science, University of York, UK
  • FRASER HAMILTON Designed For All, London, UK
  • LAWRIE PHIPPS Joint Information Systems Committee, Bristol, UK

Keywords:

Web Accessibility, Web Content Accessibility Guidelines, Inclusive Design

Abstract

The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) has developed guidelines to support the creating of Web content that is accessible to the widest possible audience, regardless of disability. Yet without considering the context in which a Web site will be used, a purely guideline-based approach may leave levels of accessibility and usability to disabled people disappointingly low. A reliance on end-user adoption of appropriate browsing technology and author adoption of appropriate authoring tools may also prevent effective accessible design, while inappropriate reference to guidelines in policy and legislation may also lead to problems. This paper promotes a framework for a holistic application of the W3C’s Web Content Accessibility Guidelines in designing Web content, by supporting consideration of the target audience, the intended outcome or experience the resource will provide its users, the usage environment, and the existence of alternative delivery mechanisms. Examples are given of how the framework might be applied to support more effective implementation of accessible Web design techniques.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1998 Amendment to Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act. Retrieved March 15 2005 from

Section 508.gov Web site http://www.section508.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=Content&ID=14

Beyer H. and Holzblatt K. (1998) Contextual design: defining customer-centred systems. San

Francisco: Morgan Kaufman.

Chisholm W. and Henry S. (2005) Interdependent Components of Web Accessibility. In:

Proceedings of the International Cross-Disciplinary Workshop on Web Accessibility (W4A),

Chiba, 2005. ACM Press, pp31-37.

Clark R., Williams J., Clark J. and Clark C. (2003) Assessing Web Site Usability: Construction

Zone. Journal of Healthcare Information Management Vol. 17, No. 2.

Clark J. (2002) Building Accessible Web Sites. New Riders.

Colwell C. and Petrie H. (1999) Evaluation of Guidelines for Designing Accessible Web Content.

In: Buhler and Knops (eds) Assistive Technology on Threshold of New Millennium., pp39-47.

Coyne K. and Nielsen J. (2001) Beyond ALT text: making the Web easy to use for users with

disabilities. Fremont, CA: Nielsen Norman Group.

Dardailler D. and Palmer S. (2001) EARL - the Evaluation And Report Language. Retrieved 1

July 2005 from W3C Web site: http://www.w3.org/2001/03/earl/

Disability Rights Commission (2004). Formal Investigation report: Web accessibility. Retrieved

March 10, 2005, from DRC Web site: http://www.drc-gb.org/publicationsandreports/report.asp

Ellison J. (2004) Assessing the accessibility of fifty United States government Web pages: Using

Bobby to check on Uncle Sam. First Monday, volume 9, number 7 (July 2004). Retrieved 1 July

from First Monday Web site: http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue9_7/ellison/

Human Rights and Equal Opportunities Commission (2000) Maguire v SOCOG - Retrieved 1 July

from HREOC Web site: http://www.ausport.gov.au/fulltext/2000/law/maguirevsocog.htm

IMS Global Learning Consortium (2002). Guidelines for Developing Accessible Learning

Applications, version 1.0. Retrieved March 10 2005 from NCAM Web site

http://ncam.wgbh.org/salt/guidelines/

Isolani (2004) Sitemorse gets nasty, accessibility is the victim. Retrieved March 16 2005 from

Isolani Web site:

http://www.isolani.co.uk/blog/access/SiteMorseGetsNastyAccessibilityIsTheVictim

Kelly B. (2002) An Accessibility Analysis Of UK University Entry Points. Ariadne issue 33, Sept

Retrieved March 10, 2005 from http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue33/Web-watch/

Kelly B. (2003) Institutional Web Management Workshop 2003: Accessibility Questionnaire.

Retrieved March 10, 2005, from UKOLN Web site: http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/Webfocus/

events/workshops/Webmaster-2003/accessibility-questionnaire/

Kelly B, Dunning A, Guy M and Phipps L. (2003) Ideology Or Pragmatism? Open Standards

And Cultural Heritage Web Sites. In: Proceedings of ichim03: Cultural Institutions and Digital

Technology, Paris, September 8-12, 2003. Retrieved March 10 2005, from:

http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/qa-focus/documents/papers/ichim03/

Kelly B., Phipps L. and Swift E. (2004) Developing A Holistic Approach For E-Learning

Accessibility. In: Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 2004, Vol. 30, Issue 3.

Retrieved March 10, 2005, from: http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/Web-focus/papers/cjtl-2004/

Koyani S, Bailey R., Nall J., Allison S., Mulligan C., Bailey K. and Tolson M. (2003) Researchbased

Web design and usability guidelines. Retrieved March 10, 2005, from Usability.gov Web

site: http://www.usability.gov/guidelines/guidelines_notice.html

National Disability Authority of Ireland. Accessibility Guidelines for Web. Retrieved March 10,

, from NDA Web site: http://accessit.nda.ie/technologyindex_1.html

Newell A.F. and Gregor P. (2000) User sensitive inclusive design— in search of a new paradigm.

In (eds Scholtz and Thomas) CUU 2000- First ACM Conference on Universal Usability, pp39-44.

Parlamento Italiano - Disposizioni per favorire l’accesso dei soggetti disabili agli strumenti

informatici. Retrieved March 15 2005 from http://www.camera.it/parlam/leggi/04004l.htm

(Unofficial English translation retrieved March 15 from

http://www.pubbliaccesso.it/normative/law_20040109_n4.htm)

Petrie H., King N. and Hamilton F. (2005) Accessibility of Museum, Library and Archive Web

Sites: the MLA audit. London: Council for Museums, Libraries and Archives.

Petrie H., King N., Hamilton F. and Weisen M. (2005) The accessibility of museum Websites:

results from an English investigation and international comparison. Proceedings of HCI

International 2005. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. In press.

Regan B (2004) Web Accessibility and Design: A Failure of the Imagination. In: Proceedings of

Designing for the 21st Century III, December 7-12 2004, Rio de Janeiro. Retrieved March 15

from http://www.designfor21st.org/proceedings/proceedings/plenary_regan.html

Section 508 Standards. Retrieved March 15 2005 from Section 508.gov Web site:

http://www.section508.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=Content&ID=12

Sitemorse (2004) Confusion Reigns Over Website Accessibility Compliance. Retrieved March 16

from http://www.business2www.com/news.html?id=1217547344

Sloan D., Gregor P., Rowan M. and Booth P. (2000) Accessible accessibility. In: Scholtz J. and

Thomas J. (eds) CUU 2000- First ACM Conference on Universal Usability, pp.96-101.

Sloan M. Web Accessibility and the DDA. In: Paliwala, A. and Moreton, J (eds) The Journal of

Information, Law and Technology (JILT) 2001 (2). Retrieved March 10 2005 from

http://elj.warwick.ac.uk/jilt/01-2/sloan.html

Smith J. (2004) Creating Accessible Macromedia Flash Content. Part 3: Keyboard Accessibility &

Reading Order. Retrieved 1st July 2005 from WebAIM Web site:

http://www.Webaim.org/techniques/flash/3

Theofanos M. and Redish J. (2003) Bridging the Gap: between accessibility and usability. In:

Interactions Vol 10, No 6. ACM Press, pp39-51.

Urban M. (2002) Implementing Accessibility in Enterprise. In: Thatcher, J. et al, Constructing

accessible web sites. Birmingham, UK: Glasshaus pp282-303.

W3C (2005). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0. W3C Working Draft, 30 June 2005.

Retrieved July 1, 2005, from W3C Web site: http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/

W3C (2005) Web Accessibility Initiative Statement on Web Access Report from UK Disability

Rights Commission. Retrieved March 10, 2005, from W3C Web site:

http://www.w3.org/2004/04/wai-drc-statement.html

W3C (2005) Questions and Answers about Baseline and WCAG 2.0. Retrieved 1st March 2006:

http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/wcag20-baseline.php

W3C (2002) Requirements for WCAG 2.0, W3C Working Draft, 26 April 2002. Retrieved July 1,

from W3C site: http://www.w3.org/TR/wcag2-req/.

W3C (2002) User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0. December 2002. Retrieved March 10, 2005

from W3C site: http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-USERAGENT/

W3C (2000) Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines 1.0. February 2000. Retrieved March 10,

from W3C site: http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-AUTOOLS/

W3C (1999) Web Accessibility Initiative Glossary. Retrieved March 10, 2005, from Web site:

http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/WAI-WEBCONTENT-19990505/#glossary

W3C (1999). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0. May 1999. Retrieved March 10, 2005

from W3C site: http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-WEBCONTENT/

WebAIM. Americans with Disabilities Act (1990), Retrieved March 15 2005 from WebAIM site

http://www.Webaim.org/coordination/law/us/ada/

WebCredible (2004) The DRC Blew it. May 2004. Retrieved March 16 2005 from WebCredible

site: http://www.Webcredible.co.uk/user-friendly-resources/Web-accessibility/drc-blew-it.shtml

Zeldman J. (2003) Designing with Web Standards. New Riders.

Downloads

Published

2006-06-11

How to Cite

SLOAN, D. ., KELLY, B. ., PETRIE, H. ., HAMILTON, F. ., & PHIPPS, L. . (2006). USING CONTEXT TO SUPPORT EFFECTIVE APPLICATION OF WEB CONTENT ACCESSIBILITY GUIDELINES. Journal of Web Engineering, 5(4), 367–386. Retrieved from https://journals.riverpublishers.com/index.php/JWE/article/view/4243

Issue

Section

Articles