TOWARD ENABLING USERS TO VISUALLY EVALUATE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF DIFFERENT SEARCH METHODS

Authors

  • ANSELM SPOERRI Rutgers University, New Brunswick

Keywords:

Web search, evaluation, user satisfaction

Abstract

This paper explores how information visualization can provide insights into the effectiveness of different query formulations or the same query submitted to multiple search engines. Different queries or search methods are deemed more effective if the fusion of their results leads to a new result set that contains an increased number of relevant documents. The MetaCrystal toolset can be used to visualize the degree of overlap and similarity between the results returned by different queries or engines. The work presented is guided by two working hypotheses: 1) documents found by multiple methods are more likely to be relevant; 2) high degrees of overlap and/or systematic relationships between the ranked lists being compared will not lead to fusion results that contain more relevant documents. MetaCrystal visually identifies documents found by multiple queries or engines. The number and distribution patterns of documents found by multiple methods can be used as a visual measure of the fusion effectiveness. Examples, using Internet and TREC data, are presented that support both in a qualitative and quantitative way the working hypotheses.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Banks D. , Over P. & Zhang N. (1999) Blind Men and Elephants: Six Approaches to TREC data.

Information Retrieval 1, 7–34,

Belkin, N. & Croft, B. (1992). Information Filtering and Information Retrieval: Two Sides of the Same

Coin. Comm. of the ACM, Dec., 1992.

Chen H., Fan H., Chau M. and Zeng D. MetaSpider: (2001). Meta-Searching and Categorization on the

Web. JASIS, Volume 52 (13), 1134 - 1147.

Eastman, C. and Jansen, B. J. (2003) Coverage, relevance, and ranking: the impact of query operators on

Web search engine results. ACM Transactions on Information Systems. 21(4), 383 - 411.

Foltz, P. and Dumais, St. (1992) Personalized information delivery: An analysis of information-filtering

methods. Comm. of the ACM, 35 (12):51-60.

Gordon, M., & Pathak, P. (1999). Finding information on the World Wide Web: The retrieval effectiveness

of search engines. Information Processing and Management, 35 (2), 141–180.

Grokker – www.groxis.com

Havre, S., Hetzler, E., Perrine K., Jurrus E., and Miller N. (2001). Interactive Visualization of Multiple

Query Results. Proc. IEEE Information Visualization Symp. 2001.

Hearst M. (1999). User interfaces and visualization. Modern Information Retrieval. R. Baeza-Yates and B.

Ribeiro-Neto (eds.). Addison-Wesley, 257-323.

Kartoo – www.kartoo.com

Lawrence, S., & Giles, C.L. (1999). Accessibility of information on the Web. Nature, 400, 107–109.

Olsen, K. A., Korfhage, R. R., Sochats, K. M., Spring, M. B., & Williams, J. G. (1993). “Visualization of a

Document Collection: the VIBE System”, Information Processing & Management, 29(1), 69-81.

Saracevic, T. and Kantor, P. (1988). A study of information seeking and retrieving. III. Searchers, searches

and overlap. JASIS. 39, 3, 197-216.

Saracevic, T. (1995). Evaluation of evaluation in information retrieval. Proceedings of ACM SIGIR ‘ 95.

Spink, A. (2002). A user centered approach to the evaluation of Web search engines: An exploratory study.

Information Processing and Management, 38(3), 401-426.

Spink, A., Wilson, T. D. (1999). Toward a theoretical framework for information retrieval (IR) evaluation

in an information seeking context. Proceedings of MIRA 99:

Spink, A., Wolfram, D., Jansen, B. J., and Saracevic, T. (2001). Searching of the Web: the public and their

queries. JASIS, 52 (3) (2001), 226 - 234 .

Spoerri, A. (1995). InfoCrystal: A Visual Tool for Information Retrieval. Interdepartmental Ph.D. Thesis.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology. February, 1995.

Spoerri, A. (1999). InfoCrystal: A Visual Tool for Information Retrieval. In Card S., Mackinlay J. and B.

Shneiderman (Eds.), Readings in Information Visualization: Using Vision to Think (pp. 140 – 147). San

Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.

Spoerri, A. (2004). MetaCrystal: A Visual Interface for Meta Searching. Proceedings of ACM CHI 2004.

Spoerri, A. (2004). Coordinated Views and Tight Coupling to Support Meta Searching. Proceedings of

IEEE CMV 2004.

Spoerri, A. (2004). Visual Search Editor for Composing Meta Searches. Proceedings of ASIS&T 2004.

Su. L. T., Chen, H. L., & Dong, X. Y. (1998). Evaluation of Web-based search engines from an end-user's

perspective: A pilot study. Proceedings of ASIS&T 1998.

Vivisimo – www.vivisimo.com.

Voorhees E. & Harman D (2000). Overview of the eighth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-8). In

E.M.Voorhees and D.K. Harman, editors, Proceedings of the Eighth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-8),

NIST Special Publication 500-246.

Downloads

Published

2004-12-31

How to Cite

SPOERRI, A. . (2004). TOWARD ENABLING USERS TO VISUALLY EVALUATE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF DIFFERENT SEARCH METHODS. Journal of Web Engineering, 3(3-4), 297–313. Retrieved from https://journals.riverpublishers.com/index.php/JWE/article/view/4315

Issue

Section

Articles