Needed: Electric Submetering "MASTER-METERING" IN COOPERATIVE HOUSING IS UNFAIR, EXPENSIVE, WASTES ENERGY
Abstract
From 1951 to 1978, sponsors of private and government-assisted
cooperative housing faced a choice about how to provide and pay for
future electric use: Should shareholders pay the utility directly for their
consumption , or should the cooperative be "master-metere d" and re-
ceive bulk billing for the entire building? Would a master-metered situ -
ation mean discounted rates and building-wide savings, or w ould it
promote unfair allocation of charges?
At the time , energy---electricity, in part icular- was relatively ine x-
pensive. Electrical use was only a fraction of what it is toda y. Man y
electrical appliances and products currently in use had not been inv en ted
by 1950. Microwave ovens, dishwashers, VCRs and frost-free refrigera-
tors, staples in today's kitchens, have only penetrated the market in the
last two decades. The recent trend toward horne offices, complete with
computers, faxes, scanners and phone machines, was yet to be imagined .
There was no need and little incentive for energy conservation to enter
into billing decisions.
With the appro val of their government partners, mo st de velopers
of limited-equity cooperative housing opted for ma ster-metered electric
service. Because so few electric dependent product s even existed, con -
sumption could not deviate significantly among individual apartments .
At the same time , electricity was cheap, and the y would receive a vol-
ume discount. Spurred by ill-conceived state regulations, the y made a
big mistake-as they wer e to discover with the first world wide energ y
crisi s in 1973 /74