Enhancing Lithium-ion Battery Performance Through Crystal System Classification: Insights From Structural and Physical Feature Analysis

Authors

  • Xiaojing Wu School of Undergraduate Education, Shenzhen Polytechnic University, Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province, 518055, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13052/spee1048-5236.4425

Keywords:

Lithium-ion battery (LIBs), crystal system, classification, machine learning, crystallography, random forest

Abstract

The physical and chemical characteristics of Li-ion batteries’ (LIBs’) performance are greatly influenced by the crystal structure system. Accordingly, identifying and classifying the crystal structure of LIBs is critical for improving their performance and safety. This study classifies LIBs into three main classes of crystal systems, monoclinic, orthorhombic, and triclinic, utilizing machine learning techniques. The performance of different models, including ensemble and non-ensemble models, was checked on this challenging classification task via key evaluation indicators. Among the different models, the standard Random Forest (RF) model provided a very strong performance; after optimization, this model was further improved to outperform all the other models with the best accuracy, precision, and generalization for both the training and test datasets. Also, the important axis of this work was the role of features in driving the classification performance. Enriched by the intrinsic and derived features, representative of the structural and physical properties of battery materials, models gained an enhanced capability to understand and distinguish crystal systems. All these features became critical for the improvement of model accuracy and interpretability. Sensitivity analysis and SHAP evaluation revealed the fact that Band Gap, Formation Energy, Volume, Density, and Volume to site features have high importance to subtle differences among the three crystal classes. These findings provide leverage in advancing the research into batteries and set a basis for future applications within the classification tasks of material science.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Xiaojing Wu, School of Undergraduate Education, Shenzhen Polytechnic University, Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province, 518055, China

Xiaojing WU, Female, was born in Jinzhong City, Shanxi Province. She got her Doctor of Electronic Engineering from Chinese University of Hong Kong in 2017. Currently she works in Shenzhen Polytechnic University as a lecturer in the School of Undergraduate Education. Her main research interests are optoelectronic devices fabrication and characterization.

References

K. Shionuma, M. Yokokawa, and T. Nagaura, “Characteristics of lithium ion rechargeable battery,” in Proceeding of Abstracts 32nd Battery Symposium, 1991, pp. 9–11.

M. Nagamine, H. Kato, and Y. Nishi, “Characteristics of new lithium ion rechargeable batteries,” in 33rd Battery Symposium, 1992, pp. 16–18.

T. Horiba, “Lithium-ion battery systems,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 102, no. 6, pp. 939–950, 2014, doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2014.2319832.

Q. Chen et al., “Effect of sodium concentration on the structure and electrochemical properties of NaxMnO2+ z cathode materials,” Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, vol. 956, p. 118085, 2024.

T. Zhang, D. Li, Z. Tao, and J. Chen, “Understanding electrode materials of rechargeable lithium batteries via DFT calculations,” Progress in Natural Science: Materials International, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 256–272, 2013.

Z. Cai et al., “Realizing continuous cation order-to-disorder tuning in a class of high-energy spinel-type Li-ion cathodes,” Matter, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 3897–3916, 2021.

J. Yang and Y. Xia, “Suppressing the phase transition of the layered Ni-rich oxide cathode during high-voltage cycling by introducing low-content Li2MnO3,” ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 1297–1308, 2016.

D. Deng, “Li-ion batteries: basics, progress, and challenges,” Energy Sci Eng, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 385–418, 2015.

S. Kim et al., “Material design of high-capacity Li-rich layered-oxide electrodes: Li 2 MnO 3 and beyond,” Energy Environ Sci, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 2201–2211, 2017.

G. Rousse and J. M. Tarascon, “Sulfate-based polyanionic compounds for Li-ion batteries: synthesis, crystal chemistry, and electrochemistry aspects,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 394–406, 2014.

C. Lv et al., “Machine learning: an advanced platform for materials development and state prediction in lithium-ion batteries,” Advanced Materials, vol. 34, no. 25, p. 2101474, 2022.

M. A. Shandiz and R. Gauvin, “Application of machine learning methods for the prediction of crystal system of cathode materials in lithium-ion batteries,” Comput Mater Sci, vol. 117, pp. 270–278, 2016.

Y. Yin, G. Xu, Y. Xie, Y. Luo, Z. Wei, and Z. Li, “Utilizing Deep Learning for Crystal System Classification in Lithium – Ion Batteries,” Journal of Theory and Practice of Engineering Science, vol. 4, no. 03, pp. 199–206, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.53469/jtpes.2024.04(03).19.

P. P. Prosini, “Crystal Group Prediction for Lithiated Manganese Oxides Using Machine Learning,” Batteries, vol. 9, no. 2, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.3390/batteries9020112.

N. Anđelić and S. Baressi Šegota, “An Advanced Methodology for Crystal System Detection in Li-ion Batteries,” Electronics (Switzerland), vol. 13, no. 12, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.3390/electronics13122278.

Y. Freund and R. E. Schapire, “A desicion-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting,” in European conference on computational learning theory, Springer, 1995, pp. 23–37.

E. Fix and J. L. Hodges, “Discriminatory analysis, nonparametric discrimination,” 1951.

V. Vapnik, The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer science & business media, 2013.

S. Gunn, “Support Vector Machines for Classification and Regression,” 1997.

B. Schölkopf, A. J. Smola, R. C. Williamson, and P. L. Bartlett, “New support vector algorithms,” Neural Comput, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 1207–1245, 2000.

L. Breiman, “Random forests,” Mach Learn, vol. 45, pp. 5–32, 2001.

O. Al-Baik et al., “Pufferfish Optimization Algorithm: A New Bio-Inspired Metaheuristic Algorithm for Solving Optimization Problems,” Biomimetics, vol. 9, no. 2, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.3390/biomimetics9020065.

D. J. Cox and J. C. Vladescu, Statistics for applied behavior analysis practitioners and researchers. Elsevier, 2023.

O. Rainio, J. Teuho, and R. Klén, “Evaluation metrics and statistical tests for machine learning,” Sci Rep, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 6086, 2024.

M. Dehmer and S. C. Basak, Statistical and machine learning approaches for network analysis. Wiley Online Library, 2012.

F. Emmert-Streib, S. Moutari, and M. Dehmer, Elements of Data Science, Machine Learning, and Artificial Intelligence Using R. Springer, 2023.

T. Eelbode et al., “Optimization for medical image segmentation: theory and practice when evaluating with dice score or jaccard index,” IEEE Trans Med Imaging, vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 3679–3690, 2020.

Y. N. Chen, W. Weng, S. X. Wu, B. H. Chen, Y. L. Fan, and J. H. Liu, “An efficient stacking model with label selection for multi-label classification,” Applied Intelligence, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 308–325, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10489-020-01807-z.

B. Lantz, Machine learning with R: learn techniques for building and improving machine learning models, from data preparation to model tuning, evaluation, and working with big data. Packt Publishing Ltd, 2023.

Published

2025-06-22

How to Cite

Wu, X. . (2025). Enhancing Lithium-ion Battery Performance Through Crystal System Classification: Insights From Structural and Physical Feature Analysis. Strategic Planning for Energy and the Environment, 44(02), 389–412. https://doi.org/10.13052/spee1048-5236.4425

Issue

Section

Articles