An Improved Time-Domain Near-Field to Far-Field Transform in Two Dimensions
Keywords:
An Improved Time-Domain Near-Field to Far-Field Transform in Two DimensionsAbstract
Computing the far-field transient response of a two-dimensional geometry requires a convolution of near-field currents with a two-dimensional far-field impulse response. In this work, a purely time domain implementation is derived and its accuracy is demonstrated. This method is applicable to EMI, radiation, and scattering problems
Downloads
References
A. Taflove and K. R. Umashankar, “Radar cross
section of general three-dimensional structures,”
IEEE Trans. Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. 25,
pp. 433-440, Nov. 1983.
J. H. Beggs, R. J. Luebbers, K. S. Yee, and K. S.
Kunz, “Finite-difference time-domain
implementation of surface impedance boundary
conditions,” IEEE Trans. Antennas and Propagation,
vol. 40, no. 1, Jan. 1992.
R. J. Luebbers, K. S. Kunz, M. Schneider, and F.
Hundsberger, “A finite-difference time-domain near
zone to far zone transformation,” IEEE Trans.
Antennas Propagation, vol. 39, pp. 429-33, Apr.
A. Taflove and S. C. Hagness, Computational
Electrodynamics: The Finite Difference Time-
Domain Method, 3 rd ed. , Norwood, MA, Artech
House, 2005.
K. R. Umashankar and A. Taflove, “A novel method
to analyze electromagnetic scattering of complex
objects,” IEEE Trans. Electromagnetic
Compatibility, vol. 24, pp. 397-405, Nov. 1982.
R. Luebbers, D. Ryan, and J. Beggs, “A two-
dimensional time-domain near-zone to far-zone
transformation,” IEEE Trans. Antennas and
Propagation, vol. 40, no. 7, July 1992.
J. J. Sacchini, W. M. Steedly, and R. L. Moses,
“Two-dimensional prony modeling and parameter
estimation,” IEEE Trans. Signal Processing, vol. 41,
no. 11, Nov. 1993.
M. A. Rahman and K. B. Yu, “Total least squares
approach for frequency estimation using linear
prediction,” IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal
Processing, vol. ASSP-35, pp. 1440-1454, Oct.
