Eddy Current Imaging of Surface Breaking Defects by Using Monotonicity Based Methods

Authors

  • G. Rubinacci Dipartimento di Ingegneria Elettrica, Università di Napoli “Federico II” Via Claudio 21, Napoli, I-80125, Italy
  • A. Tamburrino DAEIMI, Università di Cassino Via G. Di Biasio 43, Cassino (FR), I-03043
  • S. Ventre DAEIMI, Università di Cassino Via G. Di Biasio 43, Cassino (FR), I-03043

Keywords:

Eddy Current Imaging of Surface Breaking Defects by Using Monotonicity Based Methods

Abstract

This paper is in the framework of the nondestructive evaluation of conductive materials by means of eddy current testing. In particular, we consider the imaging of surface breaking volumetric defects. In this case, it is possible to use relatively “high-frequencies” and, in the limit of skin-depth negligible with respect to the relevant geometrical sizes and negligible displacement current, the problem can be modeled as a magnetostatic one. The elliptic nature of magnetostatic allows proving a monotonicity property of the operator mapping the defects geometry into the measured quantity. This makes possible to use a recently proposed fast (noniterative) imaging algorithm.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. Tamburrino and G. Rubinacci, “Fast methods for

quantitative Eddy-current tomography of conductive

materials,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, MAG-

, no. 8, pp. 2017–2028, 2006.

A. Tamburrino and G. Rubinacci, “A new non-

iterative inversion method for electrical resistance

tomography,” J. of Inverse and Ill-posed Problems,

vol. 18, pp. 1809-1829, December 2002.

G. Rubinacci, A. Tamburrino, and S. Ventre,

“Numerical optimization and regularization of a fast

eddy current imaging method,” IEEE Transactions

on Magnetics, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 1179-1182, 2006.

A. Tamburrino, “Monotonicity based imaging

methods for elliptic and parabolic inverse problems,”

J. of Inverse and Ill-posed Problems, vol. 14, no. 6,

pp. 633-642, September 2006.

A. Bossavit, Computational Electromagnetism,

Variational Formulations, Edge Elements,

Complementarity, Boston, MA: Academic Press,

R. Albanese and G. Rubinacci, Finite Element

Methods for the Solution of 3D Eddy Current

Problems, Advances in Imaging and Electron

Physics, edited by Peter W. Hawkes, vol. 102, pp. 1-

, Academic Press, 1998.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-17

How to Cite

[1]
G. . Rubinacci, A. . Tamburrino, and S. . Ventre, “Eddy Current Imaging of Surface Breaking Defects by Using Monotonicity Based Methods”, ACES Journal, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 46–52, Jun. 2022.

Issue

Section

General Submission