Uncertainty Analysis in EMC Simulation Based on Improved Method of Moments

Authors

  • Jinjun Bai School of Electrical Engineering and Automation Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, 150001, China
  • Gang Zhang School of Electrical Engineering and Automation Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, 150001, China
  • Lixin Wang School of Electrical Engineering and Automation Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, 150001, China
  • Tianhao Wang School of Electrical Engineering and Automation Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, 150001, China

Keywords:

EMC simulation, feature selective validation, Method of Moments, Richardson extrapolation, uncertainty analysis

Abstract

Recently, many uncertainty analysis methods have been taken into consideration in electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) simulation. As a traditional method, the Method of Moments (MoM) owns many advantages compared with other methods, especially in calculating the high dimension problems. However, its main disadvantage is the poor accuracy. In this paper, the Richardson extrapolation has been used to improve the MoM in order to promote the accuracy. By using feature selective validation (FSV), the effectiveness of the improvement can be obviously shown compared with the standard results calculated by the Monte Carlo Method (MC).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

M. Wu, et al., “Estimation of the statistical variation of crosstalk in wiring harnesses,” IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, pp. 1-7, 2008.

G. Spadacini and S. A. Pignari, “Numerical assessment of radiated susceptibility of twistedwire pairs with random nonuniform twisting,” IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 956-964, 2013.

D. Srivastava, et al., “Computation of protection zone of a lightning rod using method of moments and Monte Carlo integration technique,” Journal of Electromagnetic Analysis and Applications, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 118-121, 2011.

P. Manfredi and F. G. Canavero, “Polynomial chaos representation of transmission-line response to random plane waves,” 2012 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, pp. 1-6, 2012.

R. S. Edwards, A. C. Marvin, and S. J. Porter, “Uncertainty analyses in the finite-difference timedomain method,” IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 155-163, 2010.

Y. Bagci, et al., “A fast Stroud-based collocation method for statistically characterizing EMI/EMC phenomena on complex platforms,” IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 301-311, 2009.

B. Jinjun, Z. Gang, et al., “Uncertainty analysis in EMC simulation based on Stochastic collocation method,” 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, pp. 930-934, 2015.

R. W. Walters and L. Huyse, Uncertainty Analysis for Fluid Mechanics with Applications, no. ICASE-2002-1, NASA/CR-2002-211449, REC Warangal, 2002.

S. A. Richards, “Completed Richardson extrapolation in space and time,” Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 573- 582, 1997.

P. J. Roache, Patrick and P. M. Knupp, “Completed Richardson extrapolation,” Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 365-374, 1993.

M. Loeve, Probability Theory, Springer-Verlag Berlin and Heidelberg GmbH & Co.K, 1978.

IEEE Standard for Validation of Computational Electromagnetics Computer Modeling and Simulations, IEEE STD 15971-2008, pp. 1-41, 2008.

IEEE Recommended Practice for Validation of Computational Electromagnetics Computer Modeling and Simulations, IEEE STD 15972- 2010, pp. 1-124, 2011.

Downloads

Published

2021-08-18

How to Cite

[1]
J. . Bai, G. . Zhang, L. . Wang, and T. . . Wang, “Uncertainty Analysis in EMC Simulation Based on Improved Method of Moments”, ACES Journal, vol. 31, no. 01, pp. 66–71, Aug. 2021.

Issue

Section

General Submission