Impact of the Mobile Phone Dimensions on the Hearing Aids Compatibility

Authors

  • I. B. Bonev Department of Electronics APNET, Aalborg University, Denmark
  • O. Franek Department of Electronics APNET, Aalborg University, Denmark
  • G. F. Pedersen Department of Electronics APNET, Aalborg University, Denmark
  • M. Christensen Motorola A/S Mobile Devices Norresundby, Denmark

Keywords:

Impact of the Mobile Phone Dimensions on the Hearing Aids Compatibility

Abstract

In this work, we have investigated the influence of the mobile phone physical dimensions on the hearing aids compatibility (HAC). In our study, we have considered an inverted F antenna (IFA) and a planar inverted F antenna (PIFA) both fitting into a typical candy bar mobile phone. We have used a generic cubical head model to investigate the user impact on the near fields (NF). The field values are obtained by using the finite difference time domain (FDTD) method. We have observed significant difference in the peak field values between free space and with the head included although only free space values are specified in the relevant standard. Important outcome for the physical dimensions of the mobile phone is that the increase of the length of the handset significantly decreases the peak H value.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

D. Strange, D. Byrne, K. Joyner, and

G. Symons, “Interference to Hearing

Aids by the Digital Mobile Telephone

System, Global System for Mobile

Communications (GSM),” NAL

Report 131, May 1995.

“Hearing Aids and GSM Mobile

Telephones: Interference Problems,

Methods of Measurements and Levels

of Immunity,” EHIMA GSM Project

Final Report, 1995.

A. Ravindram, R. Schlegel, H. Grant,

P. Mathews, and P. Scates, “Study

Measures Interference to Hearing Aids

from Digital Phones,” The Hearing

Journal, vol. 50, pp. 32-34, April

M. Scopec, “Hearing Aid

Electromagnetic Interference from

Digital Cellular Telephones,” 18-th

Annual International Conference of

the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and

Biology Society, 1996.

M. Scopec, “Hearing Aid

Electromagnetic Interference from

Digital Cellular Telephones,” IEEE

Transactions on Rehabilitation

Engineering, vol. 6, no. 2, 1998.

“American National Standard Methods

of Measurement of Compatibility

between Wireless Communication

Devices and Hearing Aids,” ANSI

C63.19-2007, 2007.

P. S. Excell, P. Olley and N. N.

Jackson, “Modelling of an Arbitrarily

Oriented Mobile Phone Handset in the

Finite Difference Time Domain Field

ACES JOURNAL, VOL. 25, NO. 11, NOVEMBER 2010

Computation,” Applied Computational

Electromagnetics Society Journal, vol.

, no. 2, 1996.

Y. Wang, I. B. Bonev, J. Nielsen, I.

Kovacs, and G. F. Pedersen,

“Characterization of the Indoor Multi-

Antenna Body-to-Body Radio

Channel,” IEEE Transactions on

Antennas and Propagation, vol. 56,

no. 12, April 2009.

A. Taflove, “Computational

electrodynamics: The Finite

Difference Time Domain Method,”

Artech House Publishers, Norwood,

MA, 2005.

L. Farkas, J. Posnick, and T. Hreczko,

“Anthropometric Growth Study of the

Ear,” Cleft Palate-Craniofacial

Journal, vol. 29, no. 4, 1992.

“Human exposure to radio frequency

fields from hand-held and body-

mounted wireless communication

devices-human models, instrumentation

and procedures, part 1: procedure to

determine the specific absorption rate

(SAR) for hand-held devices used in

close proximity to the ear (frequency

range of 300 MHz to 3 GHz),” 2006.

http://niremf.ifac.cnr.it/tissprop/htmlcli

e/htmlclie.htm#atsftag

Downloads

Published

2022-06-17

How to Cite

[1]
I. B. . Bonev, O. . Franek, G. F. . Pedersen, and M. . Christensen, “Impact of the Mobile Phone Dimensions on the Hearing Aids Compatibility”, ACES Journal, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 984–989, Jun. 2022.

Issue

Section

General Submission