Sonic boom mitigation via shape optimization using an adjoint method and application to a supersonic fighter aircraft

Authors

  • Kurt Maute Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, CO 80309, USA
  • Charbel Farhat Department of Mechanical Engineering and Institute for Computational and Mathematical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
  • Brian Argrow Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, CO 80309, USA
  • Melike Nikbay Faculty of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Istanbul Technical University Maslak, 34469 Istanbul, Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13052/REMN.17.217-243

Keywords:

adjoint method, ray tracing, shape optimization, sonic boom

Abstract

This paper describes a computational method for the analysis and mitigation via shape optimization of the sonic boom associated with supersonic flight. The method combines a CFD approach for determining the near-field pressure field and an acoustic scheme for predicting the initial shock pressure rise at the ground. Two venues are considered for computing the ground signature. The performance of both approaches is evaluated using flight test data of two different configurations of an F5 fighter aircraft.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bletzinger K.-U., Kimmich S., Ramm E., “ Efficient Modeling in Shape Optimal Design”,

Computing Systems in Engineering, vol. 2, 1991, p. 483-495.

Busemann A., “ The Relation between Minimizing Drag and Noise at Supersonic Speeds”,

Proceedings of High Speed Aerodynamics, Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn, 1955, p. 133-

Carlson H. W., Correlation of Sonic-boom Theory withWind-tunnel and Flight Measurements,

Technical Report, NASA TR R-213, 1964.

Carlson H.W., Barger R. L.,Mack R. J., Application of Sonic-boom Minimization Concepts in

Supersonic Transport Design, Technical Report, NASA TN D-7218, 1973.

Darden C. M., “ Sonic Boom Theory: Its Status in Prediction and Minimization”, J. Aircraft,

vol. 129, n° 6, 1977, p. 569-576.

Degand C., Farhat C., “ A Three-dimensional Torsional Spring Analogy Method for Unstructured

Dynamic Meshes”, Computers and Structures, vol. 80, n° 3-4, 2002, p. 305-316.

Farhat C., Degand C., Koobus B., Lesoinne M., “ Torsional Springs for Two-Dimensional Dynamic

Unstructured Fluid Meshes”, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering,

vol. 163, 1998, p. 231-245.

Farhat C., Argrow B., Nikbay M., Maute K., “ A Shape Optimization Methodology with

F-Function Lobe Balancing for Mitigating the Sonic Boom”, AIAA 2002-5551, 49th

AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, September 4-6,

, Atlanta, GA, 2002a.

Farhat C., Geuzaine P., Brown G., “ Application of a Three-Field Nonlinear Fluid-Structure

Formulation to the Prediction of the Aeroelastic Parameters of an F-16 Fighter”, Computers

and Fluids, vol. 32, n° 1, 2003, p. 3-29.

Farhat C., Maute K., Argrow B., Nikbay M., “ A Shape Optimization Methodology for Reducing

the Sonic Boom Initial Pressure Rise”, AIAA 2002-0145, 40th Aerospace Sciences

Meeting & Exhibit, January 14-17, 2002, Reno, NV, 2002b.

Farhat C., Argrow B., Nikbay M., Maute K., “ Shape Optimization with F-Function Balancing

for Reducing the Sonic Boom Initial Shock Pressure Rise”, The International Journal of

Aeroacoustics, vol. 3, 2004, p. 361-377.

Farhat C., Maute K., Argrow B., Nikbay M., “ A Shape Optimization Methodology for Reducing

the Sonic Boom Initial Pressure Rise”, AIAA J., vol. 45, 2007, p. 1007-1018.

George A., Seebass R., “ Sonic Boom Minimization including both Front and Rear Shock

Waves”, AIAA J., vol. 10, n° 10, 1969, p. 2091-2093.

Hayes W. D., Haefeli R. C., “ The ARAP Sonic Boom Program”, Sonic Boom Workshop, NASA

SP-180, 1968, p. 151-158.

High Speed Civil Transport – Program Review, Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, P.O. Box

, Seattle, WA 98124-2207, n.d.

Imam M. H., “ Three–dimensional Shape Optimization”, International Journal for Numerical

Methods in Engineering, vol. 18, 1982, p. 661-673.

Jameson A., Essential Elements of Computational Algorithms for Aerodynamic Analysis and

Design, Technical Report, NASA/CR-97-206268, ICASE Report No. 97-68, 1997.

Jameson A., Martinelli L., Pierce N., “ Optimum Aerodynamic Design using the Navier-Stokes

Equations”, Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, vol. 10, 1998, p. 213-237.

Karr C., Bowersox R., Singh V., “ Minimization of Sonic Boom on Supersonic Aircraft Using

an Evolutionary Algorithm”, Proceedings of GECCO, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg,

, p. 2157-2167.

Kreisselmeier G., Steinhauser R., “ Application of Vector Performance Optimization to a Robust

Control Loop Design for a Fighter Aircraft”, Int. J. of Control, vol. 37, 1983, p. 251-

Lomax H., The Wave Drag of Arbitrary Configurations in Linearized Flow as determined by

Areas and Forces in Oblique Planes, Technical Report, NACA RM A55A18, 1955.

Maman N., Farhat C., “ Matching Fluid and Structure Meshes for Aeroelastic Computations: A

Parallel Approach”, Computers and Structures, vol. 54, 1995, p. 779-785.

Maute K., Nikbay M., Farhat C., “ Coupled Analytical Sensitivity Analysis and Optimization

of Three-Dimensional Nonlinear Aeroelastic Systems”, AIAA Journal, vol. 39, n° 11, 2001,

p. 2051-2061.

Maute K., Nikbay M., Farhat C., “ Sensitivity Analysis and Design Optimization of Three-

Dimensional Nonlinear Aeroelastic Systems by the AdjointMethod”, International Journal

for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 56, n° 6, 2003, p. 911-933.

McLean F. E., Some Nonasymptotic Effects on the Sonic Boom of Large Airplanes, Technical

Report, NASA TN D-2877, 1965.

Miles R., Martinelli L., Macheret S., Shneider M., Girgis I., Zaidi S., Mansfield D., Siclari

M., Smereczniak P., Kashuba R., Vogel P., “ Suppression of Sonic Boom by Dynamic Offbody

Energy Addition and Shape Optimization”, AIAA 2002-1500, 40th Aerospace Sciences

Meeting & Exhibit, January 14-17, 2002, Reno, NV, 2002.

Nadarajah S., Jameson A., Alonso J., “ Sonic Boom Reduction using an Adjoint Method for

Wing-Body Configurations in Supersonci Flows”, AIAA 2002-5547, 49th AIAA/ISSMO

Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, September 4-6, 2002, Atlanta,

GA, 2002.

Pajot J., Maute K., Zhang Y., Dunn M., “ Design of Patterned Multilayer Films with Eigenstrains

by Topology Optimization”, Journal for Solids and Structures, vol. 43, n° 6, 2006,

p. 1832-1853.

Pawlowski J., Graham D., “ Shaped Sonic Boom Demonstration – Program Overview”,

http://www.sonicbooms.org, 2004.

Plotkin K., Page J., Graham D., Pawlowski J., Schein D., Coen P., “ Ground Measurements of a

Shaped Sonic Boom”, AIAA-2004-2923, 10th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, May

-12, 2004, Manchester, Great Britain, 2004.

Quiet Sonic Platform (QSP), http://www.darpa.mil/tto/programs/qsp.html, n.d.

Rallabhandi S., Mavris D., “ Sonic Boom Minimization using Improved Linearized Tools and

Probabilistic Propagation”, J. Aircraft, vol. 43, n° 6, 2006, p. 1815-1823.

Raulli M., Maute K., “ Symbolic Geometric Modeling and Parametrization for Multiphysics

Shape Optimization”, AIAA 2002-5648, 9th AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary

Analysis and Optimization, September 4-6, 2002, Atlanta, USA, 2002.

Rupp C., Evgrafov A., Maute K., Dunn M., “ Design of Phononic Materials/Structures for Surface

Wave Devices Using Topology Optimization”, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization,

vol. 34, n° 2, 2007, p. 111-122.

Samareh J., “ A Survey of Shape Paramterization Techniques”, CEAS/AIAA/ICASE/NASA Langley

International Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics, June 22-25, 1999,

Williamsburg, VA, 1999, p. 333-343.

Schittkowski K., “ NLPQL: A FORTRAN Subroutine for Solving Constrained Nonlinear Programming

Problems”, Annals of Operations Research, vol. 5, 1985, p. 485-500.

Sigmund O., “ Design of Multiphysics Actuators using Topology Optimization – Part I: One–

material Structures”, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 190,

n° 49-50, 2001, p. 6577-6604.

Vázquez M., Koobus B., Dervieux A., Aerodynamical and Sonic Boom Optimization of a Supersonic

Aircraft, Technical report, INRIA Research Report RR-4520, 2002.

Vázquez M., Koobus B., Dervieux A., “ Multilevel Optimization of a Supersonic Aircraft”,

Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, vol. 40, n° 15, 2004, p. 2101 - 2124.

Vázquez M., Koobus B., Dervieux A., “ A methodology for the Shape Optimization of Flexible

Wings”, Engineering Computations, vol. 23, n° 4, 2006, p. 344-367.

Walkden F., “ The Shock Pattern of aWing-body Combination, far from the Flight Path”, Aeronautical

Quarterly, vol. IX, n° 2, 1958, p. 164-194.

Whitham G., “ The Flow Pattern of a Supersonic Projectile”, Commun. Pure Appl.Math., vol. 5,

n° 3, 1952, p. 301-348.

Yamaguchi H., Nakamura Y., “ Optimization of Low Boom Configuration of SST by Genetic

Algorithm”, AIAA Paper No. 98-2899, 29th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference, June 15-18,

, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 1998.

Downloads

Published

2008-11-21

How to Cite

Maute, K., Farhat, C. ., Argrow, B. ., & Nikbay, M. . (2008). Sonic boom mitigation via shape optimization using an adjoint method and application to a supersonic fighter aircraft. European Journal of Computational Mechanics, 17(1-2), 217–243. https://doi.org/10.13052/REMN.17.217-243

Issue

Section

Original Article