Fake News Detection by Image Montage Recognition
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13052/jcsm2245-1439.921Keywords:
Fake news,, montage, collage, image, feature matchingAbstract
Fake news have been a problem for multiple years now and in addition to this “fake images” that accompany them are becoming increasingly a problem too. The aim of such fake images is to back up the fake message itself and make it appear authentic. For this purpose, more and more images such as photo-montages are used, which have been spliced from several images. This can be used to defame people by putting them in unfavorable situations or the other way around as propaganda by making them appear more important. In addition, montages may have been altered with noise and other manipulations to make an automatic recognition more difficult. In order to take action against such montages and still detect them automated, a concept based on feature detection is developed. Furthermore, an indexing of the features is carried out by means of a nearest neighbor algorithm in order to be able to quickly compare a high number of images. Afterwards, images suspected to be a montage are reviewed by a verifier. This concept is implemented and evaluated with two feature detectors. Even montages that have been manipulated with different methods are identified as such in an average of 100 milliseconds with a probability of mostly over 90%.
Downloads
References
Pablo F Alcantarilla and T Solutions. Fast explicit diffusion for accelerated features in
nonlinear scale spaces. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell, 34(7):1281–1298, 2011.
Steinebach, Gotkowski, Liu
Hunt Allcott and Matthew Gentzkow. Social media and fake news in the 2016 election.
Journal of economic perspectives, 31(2):211–36, 2017.
Martin Aum¨uller, Erik Bernhardsson, and Alexander Faithfull. Ann-benchmarks: A
benchmarking tool for approximate nearest neighbor algorithms. Information Systems,
Oleksandr Bailo, Francois Rameau, Kyungdon Joo, Jinsun Park, Oleksandr Bogdan, and
In So Kweon. Efficient adaptive non-maximal suppression algorithms for homogeneous
spatial keypoint distribution. Pattern Recognition Letters, 106:53–60, 2018.
Herbert Bay, Tinne Tuytelaars, and Luc Van Gool. Surf: Speeded up robust features. In
European conference on computer vision, pages 404–417. Springer, 2006.
Sevinc Bayram, Husrev Taha Sencar, and Nasir Memon. A survey of copy-move forgery
detection techniques. In IEEE Western New York Image Processing Workshop, pages
–542. Citeseer, 2008.
Erik Bernhardsson. Annoy: Approximate nearest neighbors in c++/python, Dec 2018.
Gajanan K Birajdar and Vijay H Mankar. Digital image forgery detection using passive
techniques: A survey. Digital investigation, 10(3):226–245, 2013.
Matthew Brown, Richard Szeliski, and Simon Winder. Multi-image matching using
multi-scale oriented patches. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2005. CVPR
IEEE Computer Society Conference on, volume 1, pages 510–517. IEEE, 2005.
Celebrandil. Celebrandil/cudasift, Oct 2018.
Zhaolin Cheng, Dhanya Devarajan, and Richard J Radke. Determining vision graphs for
distributed camera networks using feature digests. EURASIP Journal on Applied Signal
Processing, 2007(1):220–220, 2007.
Steffen Gauglitz, Luca Foschini, Matthew Turk, and Tobias H¨ollerer. Efficiently selecting
spatially distributed keypoints for visual tracking. In Image Processing (ICIP), 2011
th IEEE International Conference on, pages 1869–1872. IEEE, 2011.
David G Lowe. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. International
journal of computer vision, 60(2):91–110, 2004.
Weiqi Luo, Jiwu Huang, and Guoping Qiu. Jpeg error analysis and its applications
to digital image forensics. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security,
(3):480–491, 2010.
Xia-mu Niu and Yu-hua Jiao. An overview of perceptual hashing. Acta Electronica
Sinica, 36(7):1405–1411, 2008.
Jinse Shin and Christoph Ruland. A survey of image hashing technique for data authentication
in wmsns. In 2013 IEEE 9th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile
Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob), pages 253–258. IEEE, 2013.
Edson C Tandoc Jr, ZhengWei Lim, and Richard Ling. Defining “fake news” a typology
of scholarly definitions. Digital Journalism, 6(2):137–153, 2018.