The Assessment of Cyber Security’s Significance in the Financial Sector of Lithuania

Authors

  • Julija Gavenaite-Sirvydiene Department of Financial Engineering, Faculty of Business Management, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Sauletekio al. 11, 10223, Vilnius, Lithuania
  • Algita Miecinskiene Department of Financial Engineering, Faculty of Business Management, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Sauletekio al. 11, 10223, Vilnius, Lithuania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13052/jcsm2245-1439.1243

Keywords:

Cyber risk, Cyber Security, financial sector, risk management

Abstract

Constantly evolving high technologies provide new approaches to business development and deliver unknown business risks. Online financial services and operations are integral to everyday life, making cyber risk one of the most relevant risks for the financial sector’s companies. As the survey conducted by the National Bank of Lithuania at the end of 2018 showed, the possibility of cyber threats and presumable effects on the financial system in Lithuania is one of the critical problems that should be prioritized. Therefore, it is essential to clarify what potential cyber threats in financial sector companies are considered the most significant and likely to occur. As well as identify how companies in the financial sector estimate their dispositions and preparedness for this cyber risk management and control. The findings of this research are significant for financial institutions as a tool to adopt their cyber risk management processes, increase preparedness and cyber security, and identify the possible threats to the organization.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Julija Gavenaite-Sirvydiene, Department of Financial Engineering, Faculty of Business Management, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Sauletekio al. 11, 10223, Vilnius, Lithuania

Julija Gavenaite-Sirvydiene received a bachelor’s degree in financial economics and a master’s degree in business management. Currently a doctoral student at Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, in the economic engineering field. Generally, her research area includes insurance and reinsurance analyses, financial risks, and cyber security. The subject of a doctoral thesis is cyber security in the financial sector. The scientific activity that she has been participating in involves lecturing the financial risk management subject for bachelor students, participating in international conferences, and serving as an organizer of international scientific conferences. She is a member of Lithuania’s Young Researches Society and used to serve as a board member of this organization.

Algita Miecinskiene, Department of Financial Engineering, Faculty of Business Management, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Sauletekio al. 11, 10223, Vilnius, Lithuania

Algita Miecinskiene received a bachelor’s degree in civil engineering, a master’s degree in business, and philosophy of doctorate in economics from Vilnius Gediminas Technical University (VILNIUS TECH). She has been working as an Associate Professor at the Department of Financial Engineering since 2004 and as a head of the Financial engineering department since 2016, Faculty of Business Management, VILNIUS TECH. Her research areas include risk management, effective pricing, personal finance, and investments. She presents papers at conferences and is the author of more than 40 scientific publications and the author (co-author) of two textbooks. She has experience participating in international research, study projects, and international lecturing. She has been serving as a reviewer for highly respected journals.

References

Advisen. (2018). The Future of cyber risk modeling. 18 April, 2018, London. Available at: https://www.advisenltd.com/2018/04/24/the-future-of-cyber-risk-modeling/.

Assaf A, (2008). Automation, Stock Market Volatility, and Risk-Return Relationship. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 3/2005.

Belton, V.; Stewart, T. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach. ISBN: 978-0-7923-7505-0.

Cebula, J.J.; L.R. Young. 2010. A taxonomy of Operational Cyber Security Risks. Technical Note CMU/SEI-2010-TN-028, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University.

Chang, A., Zhong, L., Grabosky, P., Citizen co-production of cyber security: Self-help, vigilantes, and cybercrime. Regulation & Governance (2018) 12, 101–114. DOI: 10.1111/rego.12125.

Chapelle, A., Crama, Y., Huebner, G., Peters, J.-P. 2018. Practical methods for measuring and managing operational risk in the financial sector: a clinical study. Banking & Finance 32(6).

Chubb Cyber Index: Providing Data-Driven Insight on Cyber Threat Trends. Available at: https://chubbcyberindex.com/#/incident-growth.

Cybersecurity Ventures Marcadet T. 2020. Navigating through Cyber Risk.

European Union (2016) Regulation 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons about the processing of personal data and the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (GDPR).

Hwang, C.L. and Yoon, K. (1981) Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Springer-Verlag, New York.

Kaspersky Lab, “Damage Control: The Cost of Security Breaches,” 2015. As of 4 January, 2018: https://media.kaspersky.com/pdf/it-risks-survey-report-cost-of-security-breaches.pdf.

KOVRR. Cybersecurity Investments vs. Actual Risk and Cyber Risk Mitigation. 2022. https://www.kovrr.com/blog-post/cybersecurity-investments-vs-actual-risk-and-cyber-risk-mitigation.

Markovic, Z. Modification of TOPSIS method for solving multi-criteria tasks. Yugoslav Journal of Operations Research 20(1). DOI: 10.2298/YJOR1001117M.

Merriam-Webster Inc./ Online Dictionary. Available at: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cybersecurity.

National Bank of Lithuania. 2018. Survey: Cybercrimes are the most significant risk to the domestic financial system. Available at: https://www.lb.lt/en/news/survey-cybercrimes-are-the-greatest-risk-to-the-domestic-financial-system.

National Institute of Standards and Technology, Standards for Security Categorization of Federal Information and Information Systems, FIPS 199, 2004. As of 4 January 2018: http://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/FIPS/NIST.FIPS.199.pdf.

Opricovic, S.; Tzeng, G-H. 2004. Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analyses of VIKON and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research. 156:445–455.

Sheth, A.; Bhosale, S.; Kurupka, F. 2021. Research Paper on Cyber Security. Contemporary Research in India (ISSN 2231-2137. Special Issue: April 2021.

Stubley D. (2013). What is Cyber Security? Independent Information Security Center. Oxford.

Velasquez, M., & Hester, P. T. (2013). An analysis of multi-criteria decision-making methods. International Journal of Operations Research, 10(2), 56–66.

World Economic Forum. The Global Risks Report 2020. 15th edition, in partnership with Marsh & McLennan and Zurich Insurance Group. Available at: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Global_Risk_Report_2020.pdf.

Wu, W.; Kang, R.; Li, Z. Risk assessment method for the cyber security of cyber-physical systems. In Proceedings of the 2015 First International Conference on Reliability Systems Engineering (ICRSE), Beijing, China, 21–23 October 2015.

Zhao, X.; Xue, L.; Whinston, A. 2009. Managing Interdependent Information Security Risks: An Investigation of Commercial Cyber insurance and Risk Pooling Arrangement Thirtieth International Conference on Information Systems, p. 189–239.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-30

How to Cite

1.
Gavenaite-Sirvydiene J, Miecinskiene A. The Assessment of Cyber Security’s Significance in the Financial Sector of Lithuania. JCSANDM [Internet]. 2023 Jun. 30 [cited 2024 Aug. 7];12(04):497-518. Available from: https://journals.riverpublishers.com/index.php/JCSANDM/article/view/16319

Issue

Section

Articles