Czech Cyber Security System from a view of System Dynamics

Authors

  • Ondrej Dolezal Faculty of Informatics and Management, University of Hradec Kralove, Rokitanskeho 62, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
  • Hana Tomaskova Faculty of Informatics and Management, University of Hradec Kralove, Rokitanskeho 62, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13052/2245-1439.824

Keywords:

Cybersecurity, System dynamics, system thinking, Czech Republic

Abstract

With the rapid development of information and communication technologies and the increasing dependence of modern civilization on them, the number and significance of threats to the functioning of the whole of society (not only smart society) are constantly increasing. Prevention, security, and protection against cyber threats pose a challenge that will have to be faced in the future. This article presents systems thinking and system dynamics approaches to solving complex problems and shows their potential use in cybersecurity, with a particular focus on the current state of cybersecurity in the Czech Republic.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Ondrej Dolezal, Faculty of Informatics and Management, University of Hradec Kralove, Rokitanskeho 62, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic

Ondrej Dolezal, is a young researcher (PhD student supervised by HT). His focus is on mathematical modeling, computer science, computer simulation (Agent Based Modeling, system dynamic) and object modeling (UML, BPMN).

Hana Tomaskova, Faculty of Informatics and Management, University of Hradec Kralove, Rokitanskeho 62, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic

Hana Tomaskova, Ph.D. published more than 90 works: Including four papers published in impacted paper (one other is in the press and 4 others are under review in journals) 40 papers are listed in database of web of science, 29 papers are listed in Scopus database.

HT is an author of one book and a coauthor of another book. During her doctoral studies, she specialised in marketing and optimisation in special algebras. As a postdoc, she has also begun to focus on modeling, namely System Dynamics, Agent-Based Modeling, UML and, most recently, BPM, which allows her to use everything from her previous studies. Citations 60, H-index WOS 5.

References

Balaban, M., and Pernica, B., et al. (2015). Security system of the Czech Republic: problems and challenges. Charles University in Prague, Karolinum Press.

Bartholomae, F. (2018). Cybercrime and cloud computing. a game theoretic network model. Managerial and Decision Economics, 39(3), 297–305.

Bernik, I. (2014). Cybercrime: The cost of investments into protection. Varstvoslovje: Journal of Criminal Justice & Security, 16(2).

Bures, V. (2011). System Thinking for Managers. Professional Publishing.

Capra, F. (2004). Tissue of life, new synthesis of mind and matter. Technical report, ISBN 80-200-1169-2.

Chen, H. T. (2016). Interfacing theories of program with theories of evaluation for advancing evaluation practice: Reductionism, systems thinking, and pragmatic synthesis. Evaluation and Program Planning, 59, 109–118.

Chichakly, T., Our story.

Cimler, R., Tomaskova, H., Kuhnova, J., Dolezal, O., Pscheidl, P., and Kuca, K. (2018). Numeric, agent-based or system dynamics model? which modeling approach is the best for vast population simulation? Current Alzheimer Research, 15(8), 789–797.

European Commission. Cybersecurity strategy of the european union: An open, safe and secure cyberspace, Feb 2013.

De Savigny, D., and Taghreed, A. (2009). Systems Thinking for Health Systems Strengthening. World Health Organization.

Oxford Dictionaries. (2018). cyberthreat — definition of cyberthreat in us english by oxford dictionaries.

ENISA. Enisa threat landscape report 2016, Feb 2017.

ENISA. Enisa threat landscape 2017, Jan 2018.

Europol. European cybercrime centre - ec3, 2017.

Forrester, J. W. (1995). The beginning of system dynamics. McKinsey Quarterly, pages 4–17.

Forrester, J. W. (1999). System dynamics: The foundation under systems thinking. Sloan School of Management. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Forrester, J. W. (2007). System dynamics the next fifty years. System Dynamics Review, 23(2-3), 359–370.

Forrester, J. W. (2009). Some basic concepts in system dynamics. Sloan School of Management–MIT.

Holt, T. J., Brewer, R., and Goldsmith, A. (2018). Digital drift and the sense of injustice: Counter-productive policing of youth cybercrime. Deviant Behavior, pages 1–13.

Holy, R. (2017). Report on cyber security of the Czech Republic 2016.

Kolouch, J. (2016). Cybercrime. CZ.NIC, 2016.

Maresova, P., Tomaskova, H., and Kuca, K. (2016). The use of simulation modelling in the analysis of the economic aspects of diseases in old age. In Business Challenges in the Changing Economic Landscape-Vol. 1, pages 369–377. Springer.

Mbaziira, A., and Jones, J. (2016). A text-based deception detection model for cybercrime. In Int. Conf. Technol. Manag.

Mbaziira, A., and Murphy, D. R. (2018). An empirical study on detecting deception and cybercrime using artificial neural networks. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Compute and Data Analysis, pages 42–46. ACM.

Jessica E Metcalf, C., Ferrari, M., Graham, A. L., and Grenfell B. T. (2015). Understanding herd immunity. Trends in immunology, 36(12), 753–755.

Meulen, R. Gartner says 6.4 billion connected.

MVCR. Department of cyber security and coordination of information and communication technologies.

MVCR. Situation report on selected areas of safety 2014, Mar 2015.

Nagurney, A. (2015). A multiproduct network economic model of cybercrime in financial services. Service Science, 7(1), 70–81.

NBU. Introduction, 2018.

NUKIB. Cyber security glossary. The National Cyber and Information Security Authority, 2015.

NUKIB. Introduction, 2015.

NUKIB. National cyber security strategy of the Czech Republic 2015–2020, Feb 2015.

Czech Statistical Office. Information society in figures - 2016, 2016.

Ostruszka, A. (2017). Threats from the point of view of system thinking.

PCR. Cybercriminity.

Richmond, B. (1994). System dynamics/systems thinking: Let’s just get on with it. In International systems dynamics conference, Sterling, Scotland.

Salim, H. M. (2014). Cyber safety: A systems thinking and systems theory approach to managing cyber security risks. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Savage, S. and Schneider, F. B. (2009). Security is not a commodity: The road forward for cybersecurity research. Retrieved May, 31, 2010.

Statista.com. Number of connected devices per person in selected countries 2014 — statistics.

Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. Irwin/McGraw-Hill.

Tomaskova, H., Kuhnova, J., Cimler, R., Dolezal, O., and Kuca, K. (2016). Prediction of population with alzheimers disease in the european union using a system dynamics model. Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 12, 1589.

Tomaskova, H., Kuhnova, J., and Kuca, K. (2016). Ageing and alzheimer disease-system dynamics model prediction. Ceska a Slovenska farmacie: casopis Ceske farmaceuticke spolecnosti a Slovenske farmaceuticke spolecnosti, 65(3), 99–103.

Shared Vision. Common action: A stronger europe. a global strategy for the european unions foreign and security policy. URL: http://www.eeas.europa.eu/top_stories/pdf/eugs_review_web.pdf, 2016.

VKB. Introduction, 2018.

Wall, D. (2007). Cybercrime: The Transformation of Crime in the Information Age, volume 4. Polity.

Yar, M. (2013). Cybercrime and Society. Sage.

Downloads

Published

2018-08-06

Issue

Section

Articles