Setting Standards for Personal Health Data in the Age of 5G and 6G Networks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13052/jicts2245-800X.1213Keywords:
Wearable sensors, eHealth, healthcare, Internet of Things, Internet of Medical Things, electronic health record, EHR, 5G, 6GAbstract
Electronic health records (EHRs) play a vital role in simplifying thorough and effective patient treatment, promoting smooth exchange of information between medical professionals, and enhancing the process of making clinical decisions. With the increasing adoption of sensor-embedded smart wearables and home automation devices, new opportunities arise for innovative solutions in various sectors, such as eHealth. In the age of 5G and 6G, the potential of utilizing user-collected health data becomes vast, promising significant improvements in people’s health and well-being. Realizing continuous healthcare access takes a step closer to reality by equipping EHRs to effectively store and interpret data collected by these sensors. This would result in personalized medical services that adhere to standardized practices. This paper presents a comprehensive review of contemporary advancements in the realm of standardization methods aimed at managing personal health data. The study delves into an extensive analysis of state-of-the-art solutions that have emerged to address the intricate challenges associated with the harmonization and uniformity of personal health information. By systematically examining these cutting-edge approaches, the review elucidates the diverse strategies employed to establish a cohesive framework for organizing, storing, and exchanging personal health data. Furthermore, the review critically evaluates the effectiveness and limitations of each solution in terms of promoting interoperability, safeguarding data privacy, and facilitating seamless data sharing among healthcare stakeholders. Furthermore, this paper then presents an approach to standardize the data by establishing semantic constraints for healthcare data types and proposing a validation procedure to ensure compliance with relevant standards and regulations.
Downloads
References
Global Industry Analysts, Inc. (June 2020). Fitness Bands – Global Market Trajectory & Analytics.
Mordor Intelligence. (January 2020). Smart Watch Market – Growth, Trends, and Forecast (2020 – 2025).
Grand View Research, Inc. (2019). Internet of Things in Healthcare Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report by Component, by Connectivity Technology, by End Use, by Application, And Segment Forecasts, 2019 – 2025.
Markets and markets. (2020). IoT in Healthcare Market by Component (Medical Device, Systems & Software, Services, and Connectivity Technology), Application (Telemedicine, Connected Imaging, and Inpatient Monitoring), End User, and Region – Global Forecast to 2025.
Weed LL. Medical records that guideand teach. N Engl J Med. 1968 Mar 14;278(11):593–600.
McDonald CJ, Tierney WM. The Medical Gopher – a microcomputer system to help find, organize and decide about patient data. West J Med 1986; 145(6): 823–9.
Evans, R. S. (2016). Electronic Health Records: Then, Now, and in the Future. Intermountain Healthcare & Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, USA.
Harrington, J. (1991). Application of open systems to health care communications. IEEE Medical Data Interchange (MEDIX).
Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Rab, S., Singh, R. P., and Suman, R. (2021). Sensors for daily life: A review. Sensors International, Volume 2.
Dincer, Can, B., Richard, R., Estefanía, F.-A., M. Teresa, M., Arben, M., Güder, F. G. (2019). Disposable Sensors in Diagnostics, Food, and Environmental Monitoring. Advanced Materials, Volume 31.
Medical devices – Quality management systems – Requirements for regulatory purposes, ISO 13485:2016, Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.
Medical electrical equipment – Part 2-56: Particular requirements for basic safety and essential performance of clinical thermometers for body temperature measurement, ISO 80601-2-56:2017, Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.
General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories, ISO/IEC 17025:2017, Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.
Cezih eKarton, http://www.cezih.hr/eKarton.html, accessed 5.7.2023.
IHE Resources, Technical Frameworks. https://www.ihe.net/resources/technical_frameworks/#IT, accessed 5.7.2023.
A. Koren, M. Jurčević and R. Prasad, “Semantic Constraints Specification and Schematron-Based Validation for Internet of Medical Things’ Data,” in IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 65658–65670, 2022, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3182486.
A. Koren and R. Prasad, “Standardization of Third-party Data in Electronic Health Records,” 2022 25th International Symposium on Wireless Personal Multimedia Communications (WPMC), Herning, Denmark, 2022, pp. 453–458, doi: 10.1109/WPMC55625.2022.10014929.
HL7 FHIR, https://fhir-ru.github.io/summary.html, accessed 5.7.2023.
Fitbit Research Library. Fitabase, https://www.fitabase.com/research-library/, accessed 5.7.2023.
Koren, A. (2021). OxyBeat Dataset. https://github.com/korenana/oxybeat-dataset, accessed 7.12.2022.
Siegel E., Schematron: A Language for Validating XML, XML Press, November 2022.