Grammatical Error Correction Detection of English Conversational Pronunciation Under a Deep Learning Algorithm
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13052/jicts2245-800X.1225Keywords:
English, speaking, grammar correction, gate recurrent unit.Abstract
Grammar correction in spoken English can enhance proficiency. This paper briefly introduces the gate recurrent unit (GRU) algorithm and its appli- cation in English speech recognition and grammatical error correction of speech recognition results. The GRU algorithm was firstly used to recognize English speech, then transform it into a text, and finally correct the English grammar of the text. Additionally, the attention mechanism was incorporated to enhance the performance of grammatical error correction. Subsequently, simulation experiments were conducted. Firstly, speech recognition and grammatical error correction were independently verified. The performance of the proposed algorithm in correcting grammatical errors in spoken English was evaluated using a self-built speech database. The results demonstrated that the proposed GRU-based algorithm yielded the best performance in independent speech recognition, independent grammatical error correction, and the overall spoken grammatical error correction. The contribution of this study lies in using the GRU algorithm to convert speech into text and perform grammar correction on the text, providing an effective reference for grammar correction in English communication.
Downloads
References
A. Rozovskaya, D. Roth, ‘Grammar Error Correction in Morphologi-cally Rich Languages: The Case of Russian’, Trans. Assoc. Comput.
Linguist., 7(1), pp. 1–17, 2019.
S. M. Hussein, ‘The Correlation between Error Correction and Grammar Accuracy in Second Language Writing’, International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(5), pp. 2980–2990, 2020.
J. W. Lee, ‘A comparison study on EFL learner and teacher perception of grammar instruction and error correction’, English Teach., 73(2), pp. 139–159, 2018.
J. Wang, F. Gu, ‘An Automatic Error Correction Method for English Composition Grammar Based on Multilayer Perceptron’, Math. Probl. Eng., 2022(Pt.29), pp. 1.1–1.7, 2022.
M. Qin, ‘A study on automatic correction of English grammar errors based on deep learning’, Journal of Intelligent Systems, 31(1), pp. 672–680, 2022.
J. Zhu, X. Shi, S. Zhang, ‘Machine Learning-Based Grammar Error Detection Method in English Composition’, Sci. Programming,
(Pt.13), pp. 4213791.1–4213791.10, 2021.
G. Eckstein, ‘Grammar Correction in the Writing Centre: Expectations and Experiences of Monolingual and Multilingual Writers’, Can. Mod. Lang. Rev., 72(3), pp. 1–23, 2016.
T. vor der Brück, ‘A Probabilistic Approach to Error Detection & Correction for Tree-Mapping Grammars’, Prague Bull. Math. Linguist., 111(1), pp. 97–112, 2018.
C. Park, Y. Yang, C. Lee, H. Lim, ‘Comparison of the evaluation metrics for Neural Grammatical Error Correction with Overcorrection’, IEEE Access, 8, pp. 106264–106272, 2020.
M. H. Alhumsi, S. Belhassen, ‘The Challenges of Developing a Living Arabic Phonetic Dictionary for Speech Recognition System: A
Literature Review’, Adv. J. Soc. Sci., 8(1), pp. 164–170, 2021.
H. A. Alsayadi, A. A. Abdelhamid, I. Hegazy, Z. T. Fayed, ‘Arabic speech recognition using end-to-end deep learning’, IET Signal
Process., 15(8), pp. 521–534, 2021.
C. Long, S. Wang, ‘Music classroom assistant teaching system based on intelligent speech recognition’, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 2021(14), pp. 1–10, 2021.
S. Tripathi, V. Kansal, ‘Machine Translation Evaluation: Unveiling the Role of Dense Sentence Vector Embedding for Morphologically Rich Language’, Int. J. Pattern Recogn., 34(1), pp. 2059001.1–2059001.18,2020.
R. Hos, M. Kekec, ‘Unpacking the Discrepancy between Learner and Teacher Beliefs: What should be the Role of Grammar in Language Classes?’, Eur. Educ. Res. J., 4(2), pp. 70–76, 2015.
X. Chen, ‘Synthetic Network and Search Filter Algorithm in English Oral Duplicate Correction Map’, Complexity, 2021(Pt.12),
pp. 9960101-1–9960101-12, 2021.
