Access Denied: Ignorance of Web Accessibility Standards by Dutch Business
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13052/jicts2245-800X.1345Keywords:
Web accessibility, Standards, Human-computer interaction, WCAG, Government policyAbstract
The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) facilitate equal accessibility to websites for people with impairments. However, the adoption of this standard remains low, leaving much of the web inaccessible to millions of users with an impairment. This paper seeks to understand why this standard has had limited impact. As the European Accessibility Act required businesses to have accessible websites from June 2025 there is growing pressure to make improvements. Moving beyond the technical evaluations that dominated past research, this study looks through a standardisation lens at likely reasons for the private sectors’ limited use of the web accessibility standard. We compare accessibility differences per industry quantitatively. We then go back to the literature and look at government practices to identify solutions for web accessibility barriers. This allows us to provide a new perspective on how web accessibility can be improved. Our findings identify two main obstacles: a lack of awareness of the WCAG standard, and difficulties in understanding and implementing it. Implementation is hindered by a shortage of developers with accessibility expertise, and by the absence of sanctions for non-compliance. To conclude, the new law first needs to tackle the barriers to web accessibility and introduce a reasonable risk on sanctions as impetus for change.
Downloads
References
Acosta-Vargas, P., Salvador-Acosta, B., Novillo-Villegas, S., Sarantis, D. and Salvador-Ullauri, L. (2024).
Aizpurua, A., Arrue, M., Vigo, M. and Abascal, J. (2011). Validating the effectiveness of EvalAccess when deploying WCAG 2.0 tests. Universal Access in the Information Society, 10, 425–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-011-0226-z.
Aljedaani, W., Eler, M. M. and Parthasarathy, P. D. (2025, February). Enhancing Accessibility in Software Engineering Projects with Large Language Models (LLMs). In Proceedings of the 56th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1 (pp. 25–31).
Alsaeedi, A. (2020). Comparing web accessibility evaluation tools and evaluating the accessibility of webpages: proposed frameworks. Information, 11(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11010040.
AODA. (2018, June 18). Complying with AODA WCAG 2.0 Distinguishable Content. Retrieved from Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act: https://www.aoda.ca/complying-with-aoda-wcag-2-0-distinguishable-content/ (accessed June 5, 2024).
Aquino, M. (2017). Web Accessibility Perceptions Survey and Interview. Ph.D. Dissertation. Worcester Polytechnic Institute.
Ara, J. and Sik-Lanyi, C. (2025). Automated evaluation of accessibility issues of webpage content: tool and evaluation. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 9516.
Australian Government. (2022, October 10). Style Manual: Accessibility and Inclusion. Retrieved from Australian Government: https://www.stylemanual.gov.au/accessible-and-inclusive-content/design-accessibility-and-inclusion (accessed June 5, 2024).
Azenkot, S., Hanley, M. J. and Baker, C. M. (2021). How accessibility practitioners promote the creation of accessible products in large companies. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW1), 1–27.
Bai, A., Mork, H. C., Schulz, T. and Fuglerud, K. S. (2016). Evaluation of accessibility testing methods. which methods uncover what type of problems?. In Universal Design 2016: Learning from the Past, Designing for the Future (pp. 506–516). IOS Press.
WebAIM. (2022, March 31). The WebAIM Million 2022. Retrieved from Web accessibility in mind (WebAIM): https://webaim.org/projects/million/2022 (accessed June 5, 2024).
Bodine, C. (Ed.). (2012). Assistive technology and science. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Bovens, M.A.P., ten Hart, P. and van Twist, M.J.W. (2012): Openbaar bestuur; Beleid, organisatie en politiek. (Public governance; Policy, organization and politics), 7th edition. Wolters Kluwer. Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands.
Brajnik, G., Yesilada, Y. and Harper, S. (2010, October). Testability and validity of WCAG 2.0: the expertise effect. Proceedings of the 12th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1145/1878803.1878813.
Campoverde-Molina, M., Lujan-Mora, S. and Garcia, L. V. (2020). Empirical studies on web accessibility of educational websites: A systematic literature review. IEEE Access, 8, 91676–91700.
Cao, S. and Loiacono, E. (2019). The state of the awareness of web accessibility guidelines of student website and app developers. In Social Computing and Social Media. Design, Human Behavior and Analytics: 11th International Conference, SCSM 2019, Held as Part of the 21st HCI International Conference, HCII 2019, Orlando, FL, USA, July 26-31, 2019, Proceedings, Part I 21 (pp. 32–42). Springer International Publishing.
CBS. (2022, May 12). Dutch digital skills at the top in Europe. Retrieved from Centraal Bureau Statistiek: https://www.cbs.nl/en-gb/news/2022/19/dutch-digital-skills-at-the-top-in-europe (accessed June 5, 2024).
CBS. (2023, May 10). Toepassing van internetstandaarden voor websites van bedrijven. Retrieved from Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek: https://www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/longread/aanvullende-statistische-diensten/2023/toepassing-vaninternetstandaarden-voor-websites-van-bedrijven?onepage=true (accessed June 5, 2024).
CBS. (2024). Bevolkingsteller. Retrieved from Centraal Burea Statistiek: https://www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/visualisaties/dashboard-bevolking/bevolkingsteller (accessed October 22, 2024).
Chandramouli, K. (2022). Role of AI in Promoting European Accessibility Policy. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M., Ntoa, S., Salvendy, G. (eds) HCI International 2022 – Late Breaking Posters. HCII 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science. vol. 1655, 613–618. Springer Nature. Cham, Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19682-9_77.
Chandrashekar, S. and McCardle, L. (2020). How WCAG 2.1 relates to online user experience with switch-based tools. The Journal on Technology and Persons with Disabilities, 223–236.
Clark, J. (2006, May 23). To Hell with WCAG 2. From Alistapart: https://alistapart.com/article/tohellwithwcag2/ (accessed June 5, 2024).
De Vries, H. (2021). What’s ‘normative’ in WCAG? Retrieved from Hidde’s Blog: https://hidde.blog/whats-normative-in-wcag/ (accessed June 5, 2024).
De Vries, H. J. (2008). Standardisation: A Business Science Perspective. In Bargaining Norms Arguing Standards. The Hague: Stichting Toekomstbeeld der Techniek.
De Vries, H.J., Blind, K., Mangelsdorf, A., Verheul, H., van der Zwan, J., (2009). SME Access to European Standardization – Enabling small and medium-sized enterprises to achieve greater benefit from standards and from involvement in standardization. CEN/CENELEC, Brussels.
Draffan, E. A., Ding, C., Wald, M., Everett, H., Barrett, J., Sasikant, A., Geangu, C. and Newman, R. (2020). Can a Web Accessibility Checker Be Enhanced by the Use of AI? In Klaus Miesenberger, Roberto Manduchi, Mario Covarrubias Rodriguez, and Petr Penaz (eds.). Computers Helping People with Special Needs, pp. 67–73. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58796-3_9.
DigiToegankelijk. (2021). Web accessibility in your organisation: roles and responsibilities. From DigiToegankelijk: https://www.digitoegankelijk.nl/sites/default/files/202103/Web%20accessibility%20in%20your%20organisation.pdf
EUR-Lex. (n.d.). Accessibility of public sector websites and mobile apps. Retrieved from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/LSU/?uri=CELEX%3A32016L2102 (accessed June 5, 2024).EUR-Lex. (n.d.-a). Accessibility of public sector websites and mobile apps. Retrieved from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=LEGISSUM%3An26026&isLegissum=true (accessed June 5, 2024).
EUR-Lex. (2019). Directive (EU) 2019/882 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on the accessibility requirements for products and services (Text with EEA relevance). Retrieved from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32019L0882#d1e32-100-1 (accessed March 7, 2025).
European Commission. (2022, January 4). Web Accessibility Directive – Monitoring reports 2020–2021. Retrieved from European Commission: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/web-accessibility-directive-monitoring-reports-2020-2021
European Commission. (2023). The Netherlands in the Digital Economy and Society Index. Retrieved from European Commission: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/desi-netherlands (accessed June 5, 2024).
European Commission. (2023a). United Kingdom in the Digital Economy and Society Index. Retrieved from European Commission: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/desi-uk (accessed June 5, 2024).
European Parliament. (2019, September 7). Accessibility: making products and services in the EU easier to use. Retrieved from European Parliament: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/headlines/priorities/social/20190227STO28989/accessibility-making-products-and-services-in-the-eu-easier-to-use (accessed June 5, 2024).
Fomin, Vladislav V., Henk J. de Vries & Yves Barlette (2008). ISO/IEC 27001: Exploring the reasons for low adoption. In: Proceedings EUROMOT 2008 – The Third European Conference on Management of Technology. Nice – Sophia Antipolis, France: CERAM Business School.
Gannon, B. and Nolan, B. (2005). Disability and social inclusion in Ireland. Report for Equality Authority and National Disability Authority. Dublin, Ireland.
Gibbs, S. (2016, November 2). Mobile web browsing overtakes desktop for the first time. Retrieved from The Guardian: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/nov/02/mobile-web-browsing-desktop-smartphones-tablets (accessed June 5, 2024).
Government of Canada. (2022, November 24). Towards an Accessible Canada. Retrieved from Government of Canada: https://www.canada.ca/en/employment-social-development/programs/accessible-canada.html (accessed June 5, 2024).
Government of Canada. (2025, January 16). About an Accessible Canada. From Government of Canada: https://www.canada.ca/en/employment-social-development/programs/accessible-canada.html
Gov.uk. (2021, December 20). Accessibility monitoring of public sector websites and mobile apps 2020-2021. From Gov.uk: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/accessibility-monitoring-of-public-sector-websites-and-mobile-apps-2020-2021/accessibility-monitoring-of-public-sector-websites-and-mobile-apps-2020-2021?
Gov.uk. (2022, August 22). Guidance: Understanding accessibility requirements for public sector bodies. Retrieved from Gov.uk:https://www.gov.uk/guidance/accessibility-requirements-for-public-sector-websites-and-apps (accessed June 5, 2024).
Gov.uk. (2023). Discrimination: your rights. Retrieved from Gov.uk: https://www.gov.uk/discrimination-your-rights (accessed June 5, 2024).
Grillo, Filippo, Paul Moritz Wiegmann, Henk J. de Vries, Rudi Bekkers, Stefano Tasselli, Amin Yousefi & Geerten van de Kaa (2024). Standardisation: Research Trends, Current Debates, and Interdisciplinarity. Academy of Management Annals, 18, 2 (published online 2024-07-10), https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2023.0072.
Hambley, A., Yesilada, Y., Vigo, M. and Harper, S. (2025). Optimising web accessibility evaluation: Population sourcing methods for web accessibility evaluation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 198, 103472.
Henry, S. L. (2018, February 27). Essential Components of Web Accessibility. Retrieved from: https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/faq/#techsnot (accessed June 5, 2024).
IONOS. (2022, October 17). Would you have guessed? These are the most popular domain extensions! Retrieved from Digital Guide IONOS: https://www.ionos.co.uk/digitalguide/domains/domainextensions/most-popular-domain-extensions/ (accessed June 5, 2024).
Webschrinker. (2023). IAB Categories. Retrieved from Webschrinker: https://docs.webshrinker.com/v3/iab-website-categories.html#tier-1-and-tier-2-categories (accessed June 5, 2024).
Kumar, S., Shree DV, J. and Biswas, P. (2021). Comparing ten WCAG tools for accessibility evaluation of websites. Technology and Disability, 33(3), 163–185.
Web Experience Toolkit. (2021, May 17). Web Experience Toolkit (WET). Retrieved from Web Experience Toolkit: https://wet-boew.github.io/wet-boew/index-en.html (accessed June 5, 2024).
KvK. (2022, Januari). KvK data over de bedrijvendynamiek: Jaaroverzicht 2022. Retrieved from Kamer van Koophandel: https://www.kvk.nl/cijfers-en-trends/bedrijvendynamiek-jaaroverzicht-2022/ (accessed June 5, 2024).
Lazar, J., Dudley-Sponaugle, A. and Greenidge, K. D. (2004). Improving web accessibility: a study of webmaster perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior, 20(2), 269–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2003.10.018.
Legislation.gov.uk. (n.d.). Equality Act 2010. Retrieved from Legislation.gov.uk: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/section/20.
Leitner, M. L., Strauss, C. and Stummer, C. (2016). Web accessibility implementation in private sector organizations: motivations and business impact. Universal Access in the Information Society, 15, 249–260.
Lewthwaite, S. (2014). Web accessibility standards and disability: developing critical perspectives on accessibility. Disability and Rehabilitation, 36(16), 1375–1383.
Luján-Mora, S. (2013). Web Accessibility Among the countries of the European Union: a comparative study. Actual Problems in Computer Science, 1(3), 18–27.
Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties. (2023, July 3). Dashboard DigiToegankelijk. Retrieved from Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties (BZK): https://dashboard.digitoegankelijk.nl/ (accessed June 5, 2024).
Montgomery, L., McLaughlin, P. A., Richards, T. and Febrizio, M. (2019). Performance Standards vs. Design Standards: Facilitating a Shift toward Best Practices. Mercatus Research Paper.
Nacheva, R. and Jansone, A. (2023). Heuristic Evaluation of AI-Powered Web Accessibility Assistants. Baltic Journal of Modern Computing, 11(4), 543-557. https://doi.org/10.22364/bjmc.2023.11.4.02.
Ontario. (2025, March 5). Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act, 2005, S.O. 2005, c. 11. Retrieved from Ontario e-Laws: https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/05a11#BK3.
Overheid.nl. (2025, May 14). Wet digitale overheid. Retrieved from Overheid.nl Wettenbank: https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0048156/2023-07-01.
Pandey, M. and Dong, T. (2023, October). Blending accessibility in UI framework documentation to build awareness. In Proceedings of the 25th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (pp. 1–12).
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). sage.
Petrie, H., Savva, A. and Power, C. (2015, May). Towards a unified definition of web accessibility. Proceedings of the 12th International Web for All Conference (W4A ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 35, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/2745555.2746653.
Pinsent Masons. (2011, October 1). Disabled access to websites under UK law. From Pinsent Masons: https://www.pinsentmasons.com/out-law/guides/disabled-access-to-websites-under-uk-law (accessed June 5, 2024).
Province of Nova Scotia. (2018). Accessibility Act: CHAPTER 2 OF THE ACTS OF 2017. From ns legislature: https://nslegislature.ca/sites/default/files/legc/statutes/accessibility.pdf.
Province of Nova Scotia. (2025, March). Business ACCESS-Ability Grant Program. From Province of Nova Scotia: https://cch.novascotia.ca/business-access-ability-grant-program.
Rietveld, R. (2021, May 18). We need to talk about WCAG. Retrieved from Level Level: https://level-level.com/blog/we-need-to-talk-about-wcag/ (accessed June 5, 2024).
ISO. (2025). ISO/IEC 40500:2012. Retrieved from ISO: https://www.iso.org/standard/58625.html (accessed November 27, 2025).
Rodríguez, G., Pérez, J., Cueva, S. and Torres, R. (2017). A framework for improving web accessibility and usability of Open Course Ware sites. Computers & Education, 109, 197–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.02.013.
Rømen, D. and Svanæs, D. (2012). Validating WCAG versions 1.0 and 2.0 through usability testing with disabled users. Universal Access in the Information Society, 11(4), 375–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-011-0259-3.
Rush, S. (2018, November 9). The Business Case for Digital Accessibility. Retrieved from W3C: https://www.w3.org/WAI/business-case/ (accessed June 5, 2024).
Rutter, R., Lauke, P. H., Waddell, C., Thatcher, J., Henry, S. L., Lawson, B., Kirkpatrick, A., Heilmann, C., Burks, M. R., Regan, B., and Urban, M. (2007). Web Accessibility: Web Standards and Regulatory Compliance. New York, NY, USA: Apress.
Slatin, J. M. and Rush, S. (2003). Maximum accessibility: Making your web site more usable for everyone. New York: Addison-Wesley.
The Python Package Index. (2024, March 24). python-whois 0.9.3. From The Python Package Index (PyPI): https://pypi.org/project/python-whois/ (accessed June 5, 2024).
Verisign. (2023, April). Top 10 largest ccTLDs by number of reported domain names. Retrieved from Verisign: https://www.verisign.com/en_US/domain-names/dnib/index.xhtml?section=cc-tlds (accessed December 20, 2023).
Vigo, M. and Brajnik, G. (2011). Automatic web accessibility metrics: Where we are and where we can go. Interacting with Computers, 23(2), 137–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2011.01.001.
Vollenwyder, B., Petralito, S., Iten, G. H., Brühlmann, F., Opwis, K. and Mekler, E. D. (2023). How compliance with web accessibility standards shapes the experiences of users with and without disabilities. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 170, 102956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2022.102956.
Wavrock, D., Schellenberg, G. and Schimmele, C. (2021, November 9). Internet-use Typology of Canadians: Online Activities and Digital Skills. Retrieved from Statistics Canada: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/11f0019m/11f0019m2021008-eng.htm (accessed June 5, 2024).
Wobbrock, J.O. (2019). Situationally-Induced Impairments and Disabilities. In: Yesilada, Y., Harper, S. (eds) Web Accessibility. Human–Computer Interaction Series. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-7440-0_5.
W3C. (n.d.). Introduction to Understanding WCAG 2.0. Retrieved from W3C: https://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/intro.html#introduction-fourprincs-head (accessed March 6, 2025).
W3C. (n.d.-a). Understanding Conformance. From W3C: https://www.w3.org/TR/2015/NOTE-UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20-20150226/conformance.html?
W3C. (2008, December 11). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0. Retrieved from W3C: https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/ (accessed June 5, 2024).
W3C. (2013, March 25). Research Report on Web Accessibility Metrics. Retrieved from W3C: https://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/2011/metrics/note/ED-metrics-20130325 (accessed June 5, 2024).
W3C. (2015, April 29). Situational terminology. Retrieved from W3C: https://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wiki/Situational_terminology (accessed on June 5, 2024).
J. Smith, Executive Director of WebAIM, personal communication, Jun. 8, 2023.
W3C. (2018). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1. Retrieved from W3C: https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/ (accessed on June 5, 2024).
W3C. (2022, October 30). Making the Web Accessible. Retrieved from W3C Web Accessibility Initiative: https://www.w3.org/WAI/ (accessed on June 5, 2024).
W3C. (2022a). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0. Retrieved from W3C: https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/ (accessed June 5, 2024).
WCAG.nl. (2023). Wet- en regelgeving. Retrieved from WCAG.nl: https://wcag.nl/kennis/wet-en-regels/ (accessed June 5, 2024).
W3C. (2023). Social Factors in Developing a Web Accessibility Business Case for Your Organization. Retrieved from W3C: https://www.w3.org/WAI/business-case/archive/soc#lolit (accessed June 5, 2024).
W3C. (2023a). WCAG 2 Translations. Retrieved from W3C: https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/translations/#wcag-21-completed-and-planned-translations (accessed June 5, 2024).
W3C. (2024, December 12) Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2. Retrieved from W3C: https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/.
W3C. (2024a, December 12) Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 3.0. Retrieved from W3C: https://www.w3.org/TR/wcag-3.0/.
W3C Silver. (2018, March 16). Problem Statements. Retrieved from W3C Silver: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/wiki/Problem_Statements#Conformance_Model (accessed June 5, 2024).
Web Accessibility Award. (n.d.). Digitale toegankelijkheid. Retrieved from Web Accessibility Award (WAA): https://www.webaccessibilityaward.nl/digitale-toegankelijkheid/ (accessed June 5, 2024).
Web-directive.eu. (2023). Web Accessibility Directive: Frequently Asked Questions. Retrieved from Web Directive: https://web-directive.eu/ (accessed June 5, 2024).
Leitner, M. L., Strauss, C. and Stummer, C. (2016). Web accessibility implementation in private sector organizations: motivations and business impact. Universal Access in the Information Society, 15(2), 249–260.
W3C. (2022b, May 13). WCAG 2 FAQ. Retrieved from W3C: https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/faq/ (accessed June 5, 2024).
