Federated Learning-Enabled Analysis of Digital Inequality and Inclusive Modeling for Native-AI Telecom Networks Using Social Mobility Data

Authors

  • Yunxia Ding School of International Education, Yellow River Conservancy Technical University, Kaifeng, Henan 475004, China https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0397-9311

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13052/jicts2245-800X.1433

Keywords:

Federated learning, native AI, telecom networks, digital inequality, social mobility, differential privacy secure aggregation

Abstract

Artificial intelligence is becoming a native capability of telecom networks, which requires AI models to be trained across multiple administrative and service domains while preserving data sovereignty and trust. To support network-level digital inclusion and differentiated service provisioning, this paper proposes a federated learning-based mobile network digital inequality modeling framework that integrates social mobility data. First, heterogeneous multi-source data–including mobile network usage records, geo-temporal mobility traces, and socioeconomic indicators from different network or organizational domains–are collected to build an AI-ready data plane without exposing raw user data. Second, a distributed feature-engineering and training scheme is designed in which each participating domain locally trains a gradient-boosting decision tree model and contributes encrypted model updates to a secure aggregation procedure; differential privacy is applied to enhance AI model governance and regulatory compliance in multi-vendor/multi-tenant telecom environments. Third, a network-facing digital inequality assessment service is constructed to quantify access and usage gaps among population segments, so that intent-based management or policy-based resource allocation can target under-served groups. Experiments on five cities show that the proposed framework achieves a validation accuracy of 91.5%; low-income users consume less than 40% of the network usage time of high-income users and, when the privacy budget ε=2, the risk of data leakage is reduced by 73.2%. These results demonstrate that privacy-preserving, federated, and explainable AI can be embedded as a native capability of telecom networks to provide actionable analytics for digital inclusion policies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Yunxia Ding, School of International Education, Yellow River Conservancy Technical University, Kaifeng, Henan 475004, China

Yunxia Ding is an Associate Professor at the School of International Education (Department of Foreign Language Teaching), Yellow River Conservancy Technical Institute, Kaifeng, China. She received her Master of Management degree from Qinghai Minzu College in 2008. Her research interests include e-commerce and social network analysis.

References

Zhang Yuhao, Yan Hui. Digital Interaction: A New Dimension for Analyzing Digital Inequality. Journal of Information Resource Management, 2025, 15(2): 36–45.

Lin Dianshan, Gong Zeyu, Zhang Heqing. Narrative Capital: The Production Mechanism of Digital Inequality in Virtual Communities. Social Construction, 2025, 12(2): 99–123.

Zheng Suxia, Li Gusong. From Digital Access to Digital Capitalism: Research Hotspots and Trends of Digital Inequality Abroad – A Visual Analysis Based on CiteSpace. Journal of Zhengzhou University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 57(4): 38–46.

Li Ling, Wang Qiuyan, Shi Jiayi, Huang Chen. The Reproduction of Digital Inequality: The Influence of Family Cultural Capital and Digital Habits on the Digital Skills of Middle School Students in Rural Areas of Western China. Modern Distance Education Research, 2024, 36(6): 69–80.

Zhao Wanli, Xie Rong. Digital inequality and social stratification: An exploration of the social inequality effects of information communication technology. Science and Society, 2020, 10(1): 32–45.

Perera P, Selvanathan S, Bandaralage J, et al. The impact of digital inequality in achieving sustainable development: a systematic literature review. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 2023, 42(6): 805–825.

Nguyen M H, Hargittai E. Digital inequality in disconnection practices: voluntary nonuse during COVID-19. Journal of Communication, 2023, 73(5): 494–510.

Heponiemi T, Gluschkoff K, Leemann L, et al. Digital inequality in Finland: access, skills and attitudes as social impact mediators. New Media & Society, 2023, 25(9): 2475–2491.

Bozan V, Treré E. When digital inequalities meet digital disconnection: Studying the material conditions of disconnection in rural Turkey. Convergence, 2024, 30(3): 1134–1148.

Leukel J, Schehl B, Sugumaran V. Digital inequality among older adults: Explaining differences in the breadth of Internet use. Information, Communication & Society, 2023, 26(1): 139–154.

Wen J, Zhang Z, Lan Y, et al. A survey on federated learning: challenges and applications. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 2023, 14(2): 513–535.

Ye M, Fang X, Du B, et al. Heterogeneous federated learning: State-of-the-art and research challenges. ACM Computing Surveys, 2023, 56(3): 1–44.

Beltrán E T M, Pérez M Q, Sánchez P M S, et al. Decentralized federated learning: Fundamentals, state of the art, frameworks, trends, and challenges. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2023, 25(4): 2983–3013.

Josey K P, Delaney S W, Wu X, et al. Air pollution and mortality at the intersection of race and social class. New England Journal of Medicine, 2023, 388(15): 1396–1404.

Abbiasov T, Heine C, Sabouri S, et al. The 15-minute city quantified using human mobility data. Nature Human Behaviour, 2024, 8(3): 445–455.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-09

How to Cite

Ding, Y. . (2026). Federated Learning-Enabled Analysis of Digital Inequality and Inclusive Modeling for Native-AI Telecom Networks Using Social Mobility Data. Journal of ICT Standardization, 14(03), 339–356. https://doi.org/10.13052/jicts2245-800X.1433

Issue

Section

Articles