Consanguinity Among Refractive Error, Intraocular Pressure and Etiology of Glaucoma in Diabetics Among Wheatish Population
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13052/jmm1550-4646.18410Keywords:
Refraction Error, Populace-based Study, POAG, Wheatish population, GlaucomaAbstract
The objective of this paper is to explore the connotation among refractive error, intraocular pressure (IOP), and primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) among the Wheatish populace. Population-based studies give significant data with respect to the predominance and hazard factors which include refractive error for glaucoma. The connotation between myopia and glaucoma is robust at lower IOP levels and deteriorated slowly with increasing IOP. This study shows the relationship between IOP and glaucoma is solid at a lower mean value of 15 ±± 3.23 levels and debilitated progressively with expanding IOP of 17.59 ±± 3.33 for PACG, 18.85 ±± 1.20 for POAG, 18.59 ±± 2.52 for PIGM and 19.12 ±± 1.42 for OH among Wheatish population. The illustration of glaucoma in myopic eyes deteriorated with growing IOP and no association has been detected with IOP ≥≥35 mmHg.
Downloads
References
Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Etya’ale D, Kocur I, Pararajasegaram R, Pokharel GP, et al. Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002. Bull World Health Organ 2004; 82:844–51.
Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol 2006; 90:262–7.
Global initiative for the elimination of avoidable blindness: action plan 2006–2011, Vision 2020, World health organization, pp. 1–97.
Resnikoff, Donatella Pascolini, Silvio P Mariottiand Gopal P Pokharel. Global magnitude of visual impairment caused by uncorrected refractive errors in 2004, Bulletin of the World Health Organization January 2008, 86(1) 63–70.
George R, Ramesh S Ve, and Viajaya L. Glaucoma in India: Estimated burden of disease. J Glaucoma 2010; 19:391–7.
Bourne RRA, Flaxman SR, Braithwaite T, Cicinelli MV, Das A, Jonas JB, et al.; Vision Loss Expert Group. Magnitude, temporal trends, and projections of the global prevalence of blindness and distance and near vision impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2017 Sep;5(9): e888–97.
Fricke, TR, Tahhan N, Resnikoff S, Papas E, Burnett A, Suit MH, Naduvilath T, Naidoo K, Global Prevalence of Presbyopia and Vision Impairment from Uncorrected Presbyopia: Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Modelling, Ophthalmology. 2018 May 9.
Foster PJ et al., Intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanics in an adult British population: the EPIC-Norfolk eye study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52: 8179–85.
Yokomichi H, Kashiwagi K, Kitamura K et al. Evaluation of the associations between changes in intraocular pressure and metabolic syndrome parameters: a retrospective cohort study in Japan. BMJ Open 2016; 6: e010360.
Jang HD, Kim DH, Han K et al. Relationship between intraocular pressure and parameters of obesity in Korean adults: the 2008–2010 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Curr Eye Res 2015; 40: 1008–17.
Ling Shen, et al., The Association of Refractive Error with Glaucoma in a Multiethnic Population, Ophthalmology 2015; pp. 1–10.
Tien Yin et al., Glaucoma in a white population, American academy of ophthalmology, 2003, pp. 211–217.
Sudarshan Khokhar et al., Refractive outcomes of cataract surgery in primary congenital glaucoma, eye, 2018.
Tedja MS, Wojciechowski R, Hysi PG, et al. Genome-wide association meta-analysis highlights light-induced signaling as a driver for refractive error. Nat Genet. 2018; 50:834–848.
Thorleifsson G, Walters GB, Hewitt AW, et al. Common variants near CAV1 and CAV2 are associated with primary open-angle glaucoma. Nat Genet. 2010; 42:906–909.
P., Shanmugam, Raja J., and Pitchai R. “An Automatic Recognition of Glaucoma in Fundus Images Using Deep Learning and Random Forest Classifier.” Applied Soft Computing 109 (2021): 107512.
Raja, J., P. Shanmugam, and R. Pitchai. “An Automated Early Detection of Glaucoma using Support Vector Machine Based Visual Geometry Group 19 (VGG-19) Convolutional Neural Network.” Wireless Personal Communications 118.1 (2021): 523–534.
