Numerical and experimental investigation on a conical poppet relief valve with flow force compensation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1080/14399776.2017.1296740

Keywords:

CFD, flow forces, conical poppet, Relief valve

Abstract

Numerical and experimental investigations have been carried out in order to study the effect of the poppet geometry on the flow-pressure characteristic of a direct acting pressure relief valve, which is equipped with a flow deflector for flow force compensation. A dynamic 3D-CFD model was built in ANSYS Fluent™, which is capable of simulating the interaction between the fluid flow and the poppet dynamics by means of mesh deformation and of a user-defined function (UDF). This model was applied to predict the flow-pressure characteristics of the valve for different spring preload settings and deflector geometries. The simulated curves were validated using experimental data acquired at FPRL (Fluid Power Research Laboratory) at the Politecnico di Torino, and an excellent agreement was found. The CFD model was then used to predict the effect of geometric parameters of the poppet, such as the cone angle and the position of the deflector. Finally, a 0D model has been developed in order to predict the flow forces; this model requires very few calibration points using 3D-CFD simulations, and can easily be implemented in lumped parameter simulation tools. It was found that this model leads to a satisfactory prediction of the flow-pressure characteristic of the valve.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Roberto Finesso, Dipartimento Energia, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy

Roberto Finesso graduated ‘magna cum laude’ in Mechanical Engineering at the Politecnico di Torino in 2005. He took a PhD in Energy Engineering, section ‘Fluid Flow Machines’, at the Energy Department at the Politecnico di Torino in 2009, and he has worked as post-doc fellow from 2009 to 2012. In 2012 he joined the Faculty as Assistant Professor with a time-contract position. His research activities are mainly focused on CFD modelling of fluid power components, especially valves, and on combustion and emission formation modelling in internal combustion engines.

Massimo Rundo, Dipartimento Energia, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy

Massimo Rundo graduated in Mechanical Engineering at the Politecnico di Torino in 1996. After graduation he participated with the Fluid Power Group of the Politecnico di Torino, as a visiting researcher, to an extensive research project on lubrication pumps for internal combustion engines. In 2005 he joined the Faculty as Assistant Professor. He is lecturer of Fluid Power courses from 2006. His research activity is mainly focused on modelling, simulation and testing of fluid power components, especially positive displacement pumps.

References

Andersen, T.O., Hansen, M.R., Sørensen, H.L., 2003. Using

CFD to establish a correlation between design parameters

and performance characteristics for seat valves. In:

Proceedings of 1st intl conference on computational methods

in fluid power technology – methods for solving practical

problems in design and control, Melbourne, Australia.

Ansys, Inc., 2011. Ansys FLUENT 14 theory guide.

Bernad, S.I. and Resiga, R.S., 2012. Numerical model for

cavitational flow in hydraulic poppet valves. Modelling

and simulation in engineering, 2012. Article ID: 742162, 10

pages. doi:10.1155/2012/742162.

Del Vescovo, G., Lippolis, A., 2003. CFD analysis of

flow forces on spool valves. In: Proceedings of the 1st

international conference on computational method in fluid

power technology, Melbourne, Australia.

Domagala, M., Lisowski, E., 2004. Determination of flow

forces in hydraulic valves. In: Proceedings of the 3rd FPNI –

PhD symposium on fluid power, Terrassa, Spain.

Domagala, M., Lisowski, E., 2003. Determination of relief

valve characteristics by the use of CAD system and CFD

tools. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference

on computational method in fluid power technology,

Melbourne, Australia.

Gao, H., Fu, X., Yang, H., 2002. Numerical investigation of

cavitating flow behind the cone of a poppet valve in water

hydraulic system. Journal of Zhejiang university science, 3

(4), 395–400.

Huguet, D., 2003. CFD analysis of flow forces on direct acting

relief minivalves. In: Proceedings of the 1st international

conference on computational method in fluid power

technology – SIM2003, Melbourne, Australia.

Huguet, D., 2004. Dynamic mesh modelling of a direct

acting relief valve. In: Proceedings of the 3rd FPNI – PhD

symposium on fluid power, Terrassa, Spain.

Jalil, J., Ahmed, S., Xue, Y. and Ghadhband, S., 2015.

Experimental and numerical investigation of fluid flow

of truncated conical poppet valve. International journal

of fluid power, 16 (1), 25–34. doi:10.1080/14399776.20

1017360.

Launder, B.E. and Spalding, D.B., 1974. The numerical

computation of turbulent flows. Computer methods in

applied mechanics and engineering, 3, 269–289.

Schnerr, G.H., and Sauer, J., 2001. Physical and numerical

modeling of unsteady cavitation dynamics. In: Fourth

international conference on multiphase flow, New Orleans,

USA.

Siemens PLM Software, 2015. LMS Imagine.Lab Amesim –

hydraulic component design library 14, user’s guide

Vaughan, N.D., Johnston, D.N., and Edge, K.A., 1991.

Experimental investigation of flow and force characteristics

of hydraulic poppet and disc valves. Proceedings of the

institution of mechanical engineers, part a: journal of

power and energy, 205 (3), 161–171, doi:10.1243/PIME_

PROC_1991_205_025_02.

Vaughan, N.D., Johnston, D.N., and Edge, K.A., 1992.

Numerical simulation of fluid flow in poppet valves.

Proceedings of the institution of mechanical engineers part

c journal of mechanical engineering science, 206 (2), 119–

doi:10.1243/PIME_PROC_1992_206_105_02.

Downloads

Published

2017-08-01

How to Cite

Finesso, R., & Rundo, M. (2017). Numerical and experimental investigation on a conical poppet relief valve with flow force compensation. International Journal of Fluid Power, 18(2), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/14399776.2017.1296740

Issue

Section

Original Article