Gas Void Fraction Monitoring with Speed of Sound Measurements for Hydraulic System Aeration Monitoring
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13052/ijfp1439-9776.2725Keywords:
Gas volume fraction, entrained air, hydraulic systems, speed of soundAbstract
Knowledge of the level of entrained air in pump inlets is important for hydraulic system design. Entrained air levels, often quantified as gas void fractions, can change with operation of hydraulic systems, so monitoring entrained air during operations can provide substantial design insight to a hydraulic system. The performance of a SONAR-based entrained air measurement system was investigated on a test hydraulic system utilizing a Coriolis meter as a reference. Two instances of the measurement system were installed on the inlet line of a hydraulic pump in series with a Coriolis meter. One instance of the SONAR-based entrained air measurement system was installed to measure the gas void fraction (GVF) within the flow tubes of a Coriolis flow meter, and a second instance of the SONAR-based entrained air measurement system was installed to measure the GVF within in a section of hydraulic hose in series with the Coriolis meter. Data were recorded to evaluate the SONAR-based entrained air measurement systems both upstream and downstream, as well as collocated with, the Coriolis meter. Speed of sound (SOS) measurements were acquired within the aerated hydraulic oil in the inlet line as the GVF was varied utilizing a variable area flow restriction installed within the pump inlet line. Increasing the restriction reduced the pressure and increased the GVF within the hydraulic fluid due to (1) the existing gas expanding and (2) additional out-gassing from the hydraulic oil. The measured SOS was utilized to determine a gas volume fraction (GVF) within each instance of the SONAR-based GVF measurement system. Additionally, GVF was also calculated from the density measurements of a Coriolis flow meter. GVF measurements from the SOS measurement test section across the Coriolis meter were highly correlated with GVF calculated from Coriolis meter density measurements. The SOS GVFs were shifted up by up to 0.126 % GVF and matched with <0.2% RMSE. For the upstream or downstream SOS GVF measurements, there was variation from those calculated from Coriolis meter density measurements. These differences were anticipated due to pressure differences in the pipe section from that in the Coriolis meter. These pressure differences resulted in differences in the air released from the hydraulic fluid and differing GVFs in the two sections. These results show that the SOS measurement technique can accurately measure the entrained air status of hydraulic systems.
Downloads
References
G. E. Totten, Y. H. Sun, R. J. Bishop Jr, and X. Lin, “Hydraulic system cavitation: A review,” SAE Transactions, Vol. 107, Section 2, pp. 368–380. 1998. www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44668176.pdf.
M. S. M. Longhitano, B. S. A. Protase, and I. H. Murrenhoff, “Experimental investigation of the air release in hydraulic reservoirs,” in Proceedings of the 10th International Fluid Power Conference, Dresden, Germany, pp. 597–608. 2016. tud.qucosa.de/en/api/qucosa%3A29337/attachment/ATT-0/.
I. A. Wohlers, M. E. A. Backes, and D. I. F. D. Schönfeld, “An approach to optimize the design of hydraulic reservoirs,” in Proceedings of the 10th International Fluid Power Conference, Dresden, Germany, pp. 609–618. 2016. tud.qucosa.de/en/api/qucosa%3A29338/attachment/ATT-0/.
S. Gullapalli, P. Michael, J. Kensler, M. Cheekolu, R. I. Taylor, and E. Lizarraga-Garcia, “An investigation of hydraulic fluid composition and aeration in an axial piston pump,” in Fluid Power Systems Technology, American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Vol. 58332, 2017. doi:10.1115/FPMC2017-4259.
K. Schrank, H. Murrenhoff. and C. Stammen, “Measurements of air absorption and air release characteristics in hydraulic oils at low pressure,” in Fluid Power Systems Technology, American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Vol. 56086, 2013. doi:10.1115/FPMC2013-4450.
A. Vacca, R. Klop, and M. Ivantysynova. “A numerical approach for the evaluation of the effects of air release and vapour cavitation on effective flow rate of axial piston machines,” International Journal of Fluid Power, Vol. 11, Num. 1, pp. 33–45, 2010. journals.riverpublishers.com/index.php/IJFP/article/view/487.
T. Ransegnola and A. Vacca. “Virtual design and analysis of the balancing element of an external gear machine considering cavitation and mixed lubrication effects.” International Journal of Fluid Power, Vol. 24, Num. 1, pp. 77–97, 2023. doi:10.13052/ijfp1439-9776.2414.
K. Schrank, H. Murrenhoff, and C. Stammen, “Investigation of different methods to measure the entrained air content in hydraulic oils.” in Fluid Power Systems Technology. American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Vol. 45974, 2014. doi:10.1115/FPMC2014-7823.
D. L. Gysling, “Accurate mass flow and density of bubbly liquids using speed of sound augmented Coriolis technology”, Journal for Flow Measurement and Instrumentation. Vol. 91, 2023. doi:10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2023.102358.
D. L. Gysling, “Clamp-on, SONAR-based volumetric flow rate and gas volume fraction measurement for industrial applications”, in Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Flow Measurement (FLOMEKO 2005), 2014. Peebles, Scotland, U.K.
D. Pan, A. Vacca, V. H. B. Manne, and D. Gysling, “On the volumetric loss caused by incomplete filling with undissolved gas in positive displacement pumps: lumped parameter modeling, CFD comparisons, and experimental validations, International International Journal of Fluid Power, Vol. 26, Num. 2, pp. 129–162, 2025. doi:10.13052/ijfp1439-9776.2622.
A. B. Wood, A Textbook of Sound, 3rd ed. London, UK: G. Bell & Sons; 1955.
S. Temkin, Sound Propagation in Bubbly Liquids, Naval Research Laboratory Memorandum, Report 6403, 1989.
K. Fu, “Direct numerical study of speed of sound in dispersed air-water two-phase Flow,” Wave Motion, Vol. 98, 2020. doi:10.1016/j.wavemoti.2020.102616.
J. Hemp, and J. Kutin, “Theory of errors in Coriolis flowmeter readings due to compressibility of the fluid being metered,” Journal for Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, Vol. 17, Num. 6, pp. 359–369, 2006. doi:10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2006.07.006.
