DETECTION AND ISOLATION OF LEAKAGE AND VALVE FAULTS IN HYDRAULIC SYSTEMS IN VARYING LOADING CONDITIONS, PART 1: GLOBAL SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
Keywords:
global sensitivity analysis, fault detection, model verification, Sobol’ indicesAbstract
Model-based condition monitoring methods are widely used in condition monitoring. They usually rely on ad hoc approaches to verify the system model and then best practices are reported to detect the given set of faults. This first part of a two-piece paper introduces a generic Global Sensitivity Analysis-based approach that can be applied systematically to verify the model parameter sensitivities used for the model-based fault detection. The case study is a generic servo valve-controlled hydraulic cylinder with unknown loading condition which is then systematically analyzed with Global Sensitivity Analysis. The method shows valuable insight into systematic model verification and resulting fault detection in terms of showing the dominant sensitivity of the nominal flow rate and nominal pressure difference, and the exact sensitivities of 0 - 1 dm3/min external and internal leakages on cylinder chamber pressures and velocity. In the second paper, an Unscented Kalman Filter-based Fault Detection and Isolation scheme for leakage and valve faults of a generic servo valve-controlled hydraulic cylinder is devised and fault patterns are presented.
Downloads
References
Archer, G., Saltelli, A. and Sobol', I. M. 1997. Sensitivity
measures, ANOVA-like techniques and the
use of bootstrap. Statistical Computation and Simulation,
Volume 58, Issue 2, 1997, pp. 99 - 120.
Beiner, L. and Mattila, J. 1999. An improved pseudoinverse
solution for redundant hydraulic manipulators.
Robotica, Volume 17, pp. 173 - 179.
Canudas de Wit, C., Olsson, H., Åström, K. J. and
Lischinsky, P. 1995. A new model for control of
systems with friction. IEEE Transactions on Automatic
Control, Volume 40, Issue 3, pp. 419 - 425.
Hall, J. W., Boyce, S. A., Wang, Y., Dawson, R. J.,
Tarantola, S. and Saltelli, A. 2009. Sensitivity
Analysis for Hydraulic Models. Journal of Hydraulic
Engineering, November 2009.
Kaliatka, A., Kopustinskas, V. and Vaišnoras, M.
Water hammer model sensitivity study by the
FAST method. Energetika, volume 55, issue 1, pp.
- 19.
Kim, S. D., Cho, H. S. and Lee, C. O. 1987. A parameter
sensitivity analysis for the dynamic model
of a variable displacement axial piston pump. Proc.
of IMechE, Volume 201, Issue C4.
Pastres, R., Franco, D., Pecenik, G., Solidoro, C. and
Dejak, C. 1997. Local sensitivity analysis of a distributed
parameters water quality model. Reliability
Engineering & System Safety, Volume 57, Issue 1,
July 1997, pp. 21 - 30.
Saltelli, A. 2002. Making best use of model evaluations
to compute sensitivity indices. Computer Physics
Communications, Vol. 145, Issue 2, 15 May 2002,
pp. 280 - 297.
Saltelli, A., Ratto, M., Andres, T., Campolongo, F.,
Cariboni, J., Gatelli, D., Saisana, M. and Tarantola,
S. 2008. Global sensitivity analysis: the
primer. John Wiley & Sons.
Sobol’, I. M. and Kucherenko, S. S. 2005. On global
sensitivity analysis of quasi-Monte Carlo algorithms.
Monte Carlo methods and applications, Vol.
, Issue 1, pp. 1 - 9.
Sobol’, I. M., Tarantola, S., Gatelli, D., Kucherenko,
S. S. and Mauntz, W. 2007. Estimating the approximation
error when fixing unessential factors in
global sensitivity analysis. Reliability engineering
& system safety,Vol. 92, Issue 7, July 2007, pp.
- 960.
Watton, J. 1989. Fluid power systems: Modeling,
simulation, analog and microcomputer control.
Prentice Hall International (UK) Ltd.