DETECTION AND ISOLATION OF LEAKAGE AND VALVE FAULTS IN HYDRAULIC SYSTEMS IN VARYING LOADING CONDITIONS, PART 1: GLOBAL SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS

Authors

  • Jarmo Nurmi Tampere University of Technology, Department of Intelligent Hydraulics and Automation, P.O. Box 589, 33101 Tampere, Finland
  • Jouni Mattila Tampere University of Technology, Department of Intelligent Hydraulics and Automation, P.O. Box 589, 33101 Tampere, Finland

Keywords:

global sensitivity analysis, fault detection, model verification, Sobol’ indices

Abstract

Model-based condition monitoring methods are widely used in condition monitoring. They usually rely on ad hoc approaches to verify the system model and then best practices are reported to detect the given set of faults. This first part of a two-piece paper introduces a generic Global Sensitivity Analysis-based approach that can be applied systematically to verify the model parameter sensitivities used for the model-based fault detection. The case study is a generic servo valve-controlled hydraulic cylinder with unknown loading condition which is then systematically analyzed with Global Sensitivity Analysis. The method shows valuable insight into systematic model verification and resulting fault detection in terms of showing the dominant sensitivity of the nominal flow rate and nominal pressure difference, and the exact sensitivities of 0 - 1 dm3/min external and internal leakages on cylinder chamber pressures and velocity. In the second paper, an Unscented Kalman Filter-based Fault Detection and Isolation scheme for leakage and valve faults of a generic servo valve-controlled hydraulic cylinder is devised and fault patterns are presented.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Jarmo Nurmi, Tampere University of Technology, Department of Intelligent Hydraulics and Automation, P.O. Box 589, 33101 Tampere, Finland

Jarmo Nurmi graduated with a B.Sc. and M.Sc. in hydraulic engineering in 2009 and 2011, respectively, at the Tampere University of Technology (TUT). He is currently working as a researcher at TUT in the department of Intelligent Hydraulics and Automation (IHA). His research interests are mobile hydraulics and condition monitoring.

Jouni Mattila, Tampere University of Technology, Department of Intelligent Hydraulics and Automation, P.O. Box 589, 33101 Tampere, Finland

Jouni Mattila received M.Sc. (Eng.) in 1995 and Dr. Tech 2000 both from TUT. He is a TUT program manager in ITER Remote Handling robotics maintenance projects. He is a coordinator of Marie Curie Initial training Network program: PURESAFE with 15 PhD-students across the EU. His research interests include machine automation and preventive maintenance, and fault-tolerant control system development for advanced machines utilizing lean systems engineering framework.

References

Archer, G., Saltelli, A. and Sobol', I. M. 1997. Sensitivity

measures, ANOVA-like techniques and the

use of bootstrap. Statistical Computation and Simulation,

Volume 58, Issue 2, 1997, pp. 99 - 120.

Beiner, L. and Mattila, J. 1999. An improved pseudoinverse

solution for redundant hydraulic manipulators.

Robotica, Volume 17, pp. 173 - 179.

Canudas de Wit, C., Olsson, H., Åström, K. J. and

Lischinsky, P. 1995. A new model for control of

systems with friction. IEEE Transactions on Automatic

Control, Volume 40, Issue 3, pp. 419 - 425.

Hall, J. W., Boyce, S. A., Wang, Y., Dawson, R. J.,

Tarantola, S. and Saltelli, A. 2009. Sensitivity

Analysis for Hydraulic Models. Journal of Hydraulic

Engineering, November 2009.

Kaliatka, A., Kopustinskas, V. and Vaišnoras, M.

Water hammer model sensitivity study by the

FAST method. Energetika, volume 55, issue 1, pp.

- 19.

Kim, S. D., Cho, H. S. and Lee, C. O. 1987. A parameter

sensitivity analysis for the dynamic model

of a variable displacement axial piston pump. Proc.

of IMechE, Volume 201, Issue C4.

Pastres, R., Franco, D., Pecenik, G., Solidoro, C. and

Dejak, C. 1997. Local sensitivity analysis of a distributed

parameters water quality model. Reliability

Engineering & System Safety, Volume 57, Issue 1,

July 1997, pp. 21 - 30.

Saltelli, A. 2002. Making best use of model evaluations

to compute sensitivity indices. Computer Physics

Communications, Vol. 145, Issue 2, 15 May 2002,

pp. 280 - 297.

Saltelli, A., Ratto, M., Andres, T., Campolongo, F.,

Cariboni, J., Gatelli, D., Saisana, M. and Tarantola,

S. 2008. Global sensitivity analysis: the

primer. John Wiley & Sons.

Sobol’, I. M. and Kucherenko, S. S. 2005. On global

sensitivity analysis of quasi-Monte Carlo algorithms.

Monte Carlo methods and applications, Vol.

, Issue 1, pp. 1 - 9.

Sobol’, I. M., Tarantola, S., Gatelli, D., Kucherenko,

S. S. and Mauntz, W. 2007. Estimating the approximation

error when fixing unessential factors in

global sensitivity analysis. Reliability engineering

& system safety,Vol. 92, Issue 7, July 2007, pp.

- 960.

Watton, J. 1989. Fluid power systems: Modeling,

simulation, analog and microcomputer control.

Prentice Hall International (UK) Ltd.

Downloads

Published

2011-11-01

How to Cite

Nurmi, J., & Mattila, J. (2011). DETECTION AND ISOLATION OF LEAKAGE AND VALVE FAULTS IN HYDRAULIC SYSTEMS IN VARYING LOADING CONDITIONS, PART 1: GLOBAL SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS. International Journal of Fluid Power, 12(3), 41–51. Retrieved from https://journals.riverpublishers.com/index.php/IJFP/article/view/462

Issue

Section

Original Article