MODELLING THE PRESSURE AND TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE OF VISCOSITY AND VOLUME FOR HYDRAULIC FLUIDS
Keywords:
hydraulics, elastohydrodynamics, rheology, high-pressure, viscosity, equation of stateAbstract
Viscosity and compressibility have a major impact upon the efficiency and dynamic response of fluid power systems. The viscosity and compressibility of five hydraulic fluids have been measured for temperatures to 150 ºC and pressures to 350 MPa. A new correlation of viscosity with temperature and pressure based on the thermodynamic scaling rule of Roland et al. is offered. This correlation provides a means to model elastohydrodynamic effects in fluid power components and extends the accuracy of fluid power system models to higher pressure. The role of phase change and the resulting thixotropy in mineral based fluids is experimentally investigated.
Downloads
References
Angell, C. A. 1995. Formation of Glasses from Liquids
and Biopolymers. Science, Vol.276, pp. 1924-1935.
Bair, S. 2007. High Pressure Rheology for Quantitative
Elastohydrodynamics. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam,
pp. 80-86, 107-113, 60-61.
Bair, S., Liu, Y. and Wang, Q. J. 2006. The Pressure-
Viscosity Coefficient for Newtonian EHL Film
Thickness with General Piezoviscous Response.
ASME, J. Tribology, Vol. 123, No. 3, pp. 624-631.
Barus, C. 1893. Isothermals, Isopiestics and Isometrics
Relative to Viscosity. American Journal Science,
Third Series, Vol. XLV, No.266, 1893, pp. 87-96.
Casalini, R. and Roland, C. M. 2007. An Equation for
the Description of the Volume and Temperature
Dependences of the Dynamics of Supercooled Liquids
and Polymer Melts. J. Non-Cryst. Solids, Vol.
, pp. 3936-3939.
Dowson, D. and Higginson, G. R. 1977.
Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication. 2nd Ed.
Pergamon Press, Oxford.
Harris T. A. 1991, Contact Bearing Analysis. John
Wiley and Sons, Hoboken.
Herzog, S. and Michael, P. 2010. Hydraulic Fluid
Viscosity Selection for Improved Fuel Economy.
Proceedings of the 7th International Fluid Power
Conference, Aachen, Germany, Vol. 2, pp. 167-178
Ivantysynova, M. and Ivanstysyn J., 2003.
Hydrostatic Pumps and Motors. Tech Books
International, New Dehli.
Jakobsen, J., Sanborn, D. M. and Winer, W. O.
Pressure Viscosity Characteristics of a Series
of Siloxane Fluids. ASME J. Lubrication Technology,
Vol. 96, pp. 410-417.
Johari, G. P. and Whalley, E. 1972. Dielectric Properties
of Glycerol in the Range 0.1-105 Hz, 218-357K,
-53kb. Faraday Symp. of Chem. Soc., No.6, pp.
-41.Liu, Y., Wang, Q. J., Bair, S. and Vergne, P. 2007. A
Quantitative Solution for the Full Shear-Thinning
EHL Point Contact Problem including Traction.
Tribology Letters, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 171-181.
Lumkes, J. H. 2002. Control Strategies for Dynamic
Systems. Marcel Dekker, NY.
Manring, N. D. 2005. Hydraulic Control Systems.
John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken. pp. 35-37.
Michael, P., Burgess, K., Kimball, A., and Wanke, T.
Hydraulic Fluid Efficiency Studies in Low-
Speed High-Torque Motors. SAE Commercial Vehicle
Conference, Chicago, paper 2009-01-2848.
Ohno,N., Kuwano, N. and Hirano, F. 1988. Observation
of Mechanical Behaviour of Solidified Oils Using
Photoelastic Method. J. Japanese Soc. Lubr.
Engrs., Vol. 33, No.9, pp. 693-699.
Roelands, C. J. A. 1966. Correlational Aspects of the
Viscosity-Temperature-Pressure Relationship of
Lubricating Oils, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Technology,
Delft, p. 108.
Roland, C. M., Bair, S. and Casalini, R. 2006. Thermodynamic
Scaling of the Viscosity of van der
Waals, H-Bonded, and Ionic Liquids. J. Chem.
Phys. Vol. 125, pp. 124508-1 -12508-8.
Stickel, F., Fischer, E.W. and Richert, R. 1996. Dynamics
of Glass-Forming Liquids. II. Detailed
Comparison of Dielectric Relaxation, DCConductivity,
and Viscosity Data. J. Chem. Phys.,
Vol.104, No.5, pp. 2043-2055.