OPTIMISATION OF FLOW THROUGH A PNEUMATIC CONTROL VALVE USING CFD ANALYSIS AND EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATION
Keywords:
computational fluid dynamics, pneumatic control valveAbstract
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) is becoming a tool that can be used by engineers to optimise valve performance. CFD is used here to model the fluid flow characteristics through a control valve. By changing various aspects of the internal flow path, the performance of a valve is improved through a greater mass flow rate to optimise its performance. These changes included rounding sharp edges, removing areas of dead-space and moving some internal parts to reduce sharp changes in direction. The CFD model was used to create a new modified design which was then manufactured for testing. The test results were compared to the CFD results from the new model. The CFD and experimental results showed a similar increase in flow rate from the original to the modified valve showing that changes to the internal flow path had a positive effect on the measured flow rate.
Downloads
References
ANSYS CFX, Release 10.0: Installation and Overview,
ANSYS
Bardina, J., Ferziger, J. H. and Reynolds, W. C.
Improved turbulence models based on large
eddy simulation of homogeneous, incompressible,
turbulent flows. Technical Report TF-19, Thermal
sciences div., Dept. of Mech. Eng., Stanford Univ.,
Stanford, CA.
Bifold-Fluidpower, Bifold-Fluidpower Corporate
Catalogue 2006. Bifold-Fluidpower.
Bredau, J. and Helduser, S. 1999. Numerical Flow
Calculation in Pneumatics and Comparison with
Measurement Results. 6th Scandinavian International
Conference on Fluid Power, SICFP’99,
pp. 759-772.
Davis, J. A. and Stewart, M. 2002. Predicting Globe
Controle Valve Performance – Part I: CFD Modeling.
ASME J. Fluids Eng., 124, pp. 772-777.
Davis, J. A. 2002. Predicting Globe Controle Valve
Performance – Part II: Experimental Verification.
ASME J. Fluids Eng., 124, pp. 778-783.
Davis, J. A. and Stewart, M. 1998. Geometry Effects
when using CFD Analysis as a Design Tool to Predict
Control Valve Performance. Developments in
Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 19, pp. 38-45.
Huang, C. and Kim, R. H. 1996. Three Dimensional
Analysis of Partially Open Butterfly Valve Flows.
ASME J. Fluids Eng., 118, pp. 562-568.
Ito, K., Takahashi, K. and Inoue, K. 1993. Flow in a
Poppet Valve Computation of Pressure Distribution
using Streamline Coordinate System. JSME International Journal, 36, pp. 42-50.
Kerh, T., Lee, J. J. and Wellford, L. C. 1997. Transient
Fluid – Structure Interaction in a Control
Valve. ASME J. Fluids Eng., 119, pp. 354-359.
Min, B., Xin, F. and Ying, C. 2001. Computational
Fluid Dynamics Approach to Pressure Loss Analysis
of Hydraulic Spool Valve. Fifth International
Conference on Fluid Power Transmission and Control,
ICFP 2001, Hangzhou, China.
Nadarajah, S., Balabani, S., Tindal, M. J. and Yianneskis,
M. 1998. The Turbulence Structure of the
Annular Non-Swirling Flow Past an Axisymmetric
Poppet Valve. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., 212, pp. 455-
Nadarajah, S., Balabani, S., Tindal, M. J. and Yianneskis,
M. 1998. The Effect of Swirl on the Annular
Flow Past an Axisymmetric Poppet Valve. Proc.
Inst. Mech. Eng., 212, pp. 473-484.
Roorda, O. 1998. Computer Simulation Helps Reduce
Pressure Loss. Water, Engineering and Management,
, pp. 22-24.
Salvador, G. P. and Valverde, J. A. 2004. Three-
Dimensional control valve with Complex Geometry:
CFD Modelling and Experimental Validation.
AIAA 2004 Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit,
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Sullivan, J. A. 1975. Fluid Power: Theory and Applications.
Reston Pub Co.
Yeaple, F. D. 1990. Fluid Power Design Handbook.
Marcel Dekker Inc.
