EXPERIMENTS AND CFD SIMULATIONS FOR THE CHARACTERISATION OF THE ORIFICE FLOW IN A FOUR-WAY SERVOVALVE
Keywords:
orifice flow, CFD analysis, experiments on hydraulic fluids, laminar-to-turbulent transition, electro-hydraulic servovalveAbstract
It is well-known that the discharge efficiency of an orifice varies with the flow condition: it is very low for laminar flow, it reaches a maximum in “mixed” conditions, and it tends to be constant (i.e. insensitive to flow variations) when turbulence is fully developed. However, the classical approach to the modelling of servo-hydraulic actuators is based on the hypothesis that the flow through the servovalve orifices is turbulent, and this assumption can lead to significant errors if the dynamics of actuators operating in extreme conditions is concerned. This is the case of aerospace applications, since flight actuators can be commanded to move against high counteracting loads or at very low velocities, and a laminar (or rather “mixed”) flow pattern can be established in the servovalve orifices. In the paper, the flow through the Moog D633 four-way servovalve is studied by means of experiments and Computational Fluid Dynamics simulations (developed in the STAR-CD environment). Two are the basic objectives of the investigation: to characterise the laminar-to-turbulent flow transition in the orifices of an aircraft-type hydraulic component, providing an original physical interpretation to the increase of the orifice discharge efficiency in “mixed” flow conditions, and to highlight the necessity of using Reynolds-dependant orifice equations for the modelling of high-performance servo-hydraulic actuators.
Downloads
References
Baudry, X. and Mare, J. C. 2000. Linking CFD and
Lumped Parameters Analysis for the Design of
Flow Compensated Spool Valves. Proceedings of
the 1st FPNI-PhD Symposium, Hamburg (Germany),
pp. 249-258.
Bianchi G. B. and Fontanesi S. 2003. On the Applications
of Low-Reynolds Cubic k-ε Turbulence Models
in 3D Simulations of ICE Intake Flows. SAE
Technical Paper Series 2003-01-0003.
Borutzky W., Barnard B. and Thoma J. 2002. An
Orifice Flow Model for Laminar and Turbulent
Conditions. Simulation Modelling Practice & Theory,
Vol. 10, N. 3, pp. 141-152.
Chen C. J. and Jaw S. Y. 1998. Fundamentals of Turbulence
Modelling. Taylor & Francis.
Del Vescovo G. 2004. Experimental and Numerical
Analysis of the Flow Forces on an Open-Centre Directional
Control Valve. Proceedings of the 3rd
FPNI-PhD Symposium on Fluid Power, Terrassa
(Spain), pp. 83-92.
Gori S. 2005. Development and Experimental Validation
of CFD Models for the Characterisation of the
Flow through Electro-Hydraulic Servovalves (in
Italian), Second Level Degree Thesis in Aerospace
Engineering, University of Pisa.
Koivula T. 2000. On Cavitation in Fluid Power. Proceedings
of the 1st FPNI-PhD Symposium, Hamburg
(Germany), pp. 371-382.
Launder B. E. and Spalding D. B. 1972. Mathematical
Models of Turbulence. Academic Press.
Merritt H. E. 1967. Hydraulic Control Systems. John
Wiley & Sons.
Product data sheet: Moog D633 and D634 Series Direct
Drive Servo-Proportional Control Valves, Moog
Industrial Controls Division, Moog Inc. USA.
Software user guide: STAR-CD Version 3.15 User
Guide. Computational Dynamics Limited, 2001.
Viall E. N. and Zhang Q. 2000. Determining the Discharge
Coefficient of a Spool Valve. Proceedings of
the American Control Conference, Chicago (USA),
pp. 3600-3604.
