MODEL AND EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATION OF A LOAD SENSING SYSTEM WITH A CRITICALLY LAPPED REGULATOR SPOOL
Keywords:
load sensing, stability, linearization, operating point, energy efficiencyAbstract
A load sensing (LS) system is one in which the pump flow is regulated to keep the pressure drop across an orifice constant and independent of any variation in the load pressure. This ensures that the pressure loss across the orifice is kept to a minimum, thereby increasing efficiency. An LS regulator spool is used to sense the pressure drop across the orifice to control pump delivery. The spool can be underlapped, critically lapped or overlapped. As a trade-off between efficiency and dynamic response, the LS spool is usually critically lapped. This results in a nonlinear model that is sensitive to operating regions.
In this paper, a review of published literature on LS systems is briefly summarized. An LS system model is developed and linearized. Procedures to solve these very complex equations are introduced. Because load sensing systems require pressure feedback, stability can often be an issue. Analysis of these systems to determine the steady state and dynamic performance is very difficult to do because of the dependency of the models on the operating point. Linearized models which reflect a methodology to account for changing operating conditions have been developed and have established three distinct regions of operation (labeled “Conditions I, II, and III”). This paper presents the experimental nature of these conditions and provides experimental evidence that the models so derived are valid over certain frequency ranges. The objective of this paper, then, was to establish confidence in the models by examining frequency response performance under these three distinct conditions. The results show that good agreement does exist between the models and their physical counterparts and establishes limitations thereof.
This research can assist in the design or optimization of an LS system and help in the development of advanced control strategies for obtaining further efficiency within certain dynamic performance constraints.
Downloads
References
Bitner, D. and Burton, R. T. 1984(1). Experimental
Measurement of Load Sensing Pump Parameters.
Proceeding of the 40th National Conference on Fluid
Power, Chicago, pp. 153-161.
Bitner, D. and Burton, R. T. 1984(2). Small Signal
Model of a Load Sensing Pump. Proceeding of the
th National Conference on Fluid Power, Chicago,
pp. 107-112.
Bitner, D. 1986. Analytical and Experimental Analysis
of a Load Sensing Pump. M. Sc. thesis, University
of Saskatchewan, Canada.Book, R. and Goering, C. E. 1997. Load Sensing Hydraulic
System Simulation. Applied Engineering in
Agriculture. ASAE Vol.13 (1), pp.17-25.
Erkkila, M. 1999. Practical Modelling of Load-
Sensing Systems. Proceeding of the Sixth Scandinavian
International Conference on Fluid Power,
SICFP'99, Tampere, Finland, pp. 445.
Kappl, T.J. 2001. Semiempirical Model for Variable
Displacement Pump with Load Sensing Regulator
and Power Restrictor. Proceedings of 2001 ASME
International Mechanical Engineering Congress
and Exposition. New York, NY, USA. Nov. 11.
Kavanagh, G. P., Schoenau, G.J. and Burton, R.T.
Dynamic Analysis of a Variable Displacement
Pump. ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems
Measurement and Control, Vol.112, No.1, pp.122.
Kim, S. D. and Cho, H. S. 1988. Stability Analysis of
a Load-Sensing Hydraulic System. Proceedings of
the Institute of Mechanical Engineering. Part A.
Vol. 202, pp. 79-88.
Krus, P. 1988. On Load Sensing Fluid Power Systems.
Dissertation No.198. Linkoping University, Sweden.
Lantto, B., Palmberg, J.O. and Krus, P. 1990. Static
and Dynamic Performance of Mobile Load-sensing
Systems with Two Different Types of Pressure-
Compensated Valves. SAE Technical Paper Series.
SAE. Sept. 10-13, pp. 251.
Lantto, B., Krus, P. and Palmberg, J.O. 1991. Interaction
between Loads in Load-sensing Systems. Proceeding
of the 2nd Tampere International Conference
on Fluid Power. Linkoping, Sweden, pp. 53.
Merritt, H.E. 1967. Hydraulic Control Systems. John
Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Palmberg, J. O., Krus, P. and Ding, K. 1985. Dynamic
Response Characteristics of Pressure-Control
Pumps. The First International Conference on Fluid
Power Transmission and Control. Zhejiang University,
Hangzhou, China, pp. 110.
Sakurai, Y. and Takahashi, K. 1997. Modelling and
Simulation of a Load Sensing System by Bond-
Graph Method. Proceedings of the Fifth
Scandinavian International Conference on Fluid
Power. Linkoping University. Vol. 3, pp.187-198.
Wu, D. 2003. Modeling and Experimental Evaluation
of a Load -Sensing and Pressure Compensated Hydraulic
System, PhD Thesis, University of Saskatchewan.
Wu, D., Burton, R., Schoenau, G. and Bitner, D.
(1). Establishing Operating Points for a Linearized
Model of a Load Sensing System. International
Journal of Fluid Power. Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 47-54.
Wu, D., Burton, R., and Schoenau, G. 2002(2). An
Empirical Discharge Coefficient Model for Orifice
Flow. International Journal of Fluid Power. Vol. 3,
No. 3.
Wu, D., Burton, R., Schoenau, G. and Bitner, D.
Modeling of Orifice Flow Rate at Very Small
Openings. International Journal of Fluid Power.
Vol. 4, No. 1.
Zarotti, L. G. and Nervegna, N. 1988. Saturation
Problems in Load Sensing Architectures. Proceeding
of the 43rd National Conference on Fluid Power,
NCFP, Chicago, pp. 393.