A SYSTEMATIC METHODOLOGY FOR OPTIMAL COMPONENT SELECTION OF ELECTROHYDRAULIC SERVOSYSTEMS

Authors

  • Evangelos Papadopoulos Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 15780 Athens, Greece
  • Ioannis Davliakos Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 15780 Athens, Greece

Keywords:

electrohydraulic servosystem, optimization, optimal design

Abstract

This paper focuses on optimal hydraulic component selection for electrohydraulic systems used in high performance servo tasks. Dynamic models of low complexity are proposed that describe the salient dynamics of basic electrohydraulic equipment. Rigid body equations of motion, the hydraulic dynamics and typical trajectory inputs are used in conjunction with optimization techniques, to yield an optimal hydraulic servosystem design with respect to a number of criteria such as cost, weight or power. The optimization procedure employs component databases with real industrial data, resulting in realizable designs. An example illustrates the developed methodology.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Evangelos Papadopoulos, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 15780 Athens, Greece

Evangelos Papadopoulos Received his Diploma from the NTUA in 1981 and his M.S. and Ph.D. from MIT in 1983 and 1991 respectively, all in Mechanical Engineering (ME). He then joined the ME Dept. at McGill U. and he became an Assoc. Prof. in 1997. Currently, he is an Assoc. Prof. with the ME Dept. of NTUA. His research interests are in robotics, mechatronics, modelling and control of dynamic systems and electrohydraulic servo systems. He is a senior member of IEEE and AIAA and a member of ASME and Sigma Xi.

Ioannis Davliakos, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 15780 Athens, Greece

Ioannis Davliakos Received his Diploma from the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (AUTH), in 1998, in Mechanical Engineering. In 1999, he received the M.S. degree from the National Technical University of Athens (NTUA), where he is currently working towards a Ph.D. degree in Mechanical Engineering. His research interests are in electrohydraulic servo-systems, robotic parallel mechanisms and control of dynamic systems.

References

Biggs, M. C. 1975. Constrained Minimization Using

Recursive Quadratic Programming. Towards

Global Optimization (L. C. W. Dixon and G. P.

Szergo, eds.), North-Holland, pp. 341-349.

Blackburn, J. F., Reethof, G. and Shearer, J. L.,

Fluid Power Control. Cambridge, MA: MIT

Press.

Bowling, A. and Khatib, O. 2002. Actuator Selection

for Desired Dynamic Performance. Proc. of the

IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. On Intelligent Robots and

Systems EPFL, pp. 1966 – 1973.

Chatzakos, P. and Papadopoulos, E. 2003. On

Model-Based Control of Hydraulic Actuators. Proc.

of RAAD '03, 12th International Workshop on Robotics

in Alpe-Adria-Danube Region, Cassino, Italy.

Chatzakos, P. 2002. Design, Modeling and Control of

a High-Performance Electrohydraulic Servosystem.

Master Thesis, in Greek, NTUA.

Han, S. P. 1977. A Globally Convergence Method for

Nonlinear Programming. Journal of Optimization

Theory and Application, Vol. 22, p. 297.

Hansen, M. R. and Andersen, T. O. 2001. A Design

Procedure for Actuator Control Systems Using Optimization

Methods. The 7th Scandinavian International

Conference on Fluid Power, Linköping, Sweden.

Hansen, M. R., Andersen, T. O. and Conrad, F.

Experimentally Based Analysis and Synthesis

of Hydraulically Actuated Loader Crane. Power

Transmission and Motion Control (PTMC 2001),

Bath, UK.

Herman, T., Bonicelli, B., Sevila, F., Monsion, M.

and Bergeon, B. 1992. Bond-graph modeling and

identification of a high power hydraulic system. In

Proc. 11th IASTED Int. Conf. Modelling, Identification

and Control, Innsbruck, Austria.

Jelali, M. and Kroll, A. 2003. Hydraulic Servosystems.

Modelling, Identification and Control.

Springer.

Krus, P., Jansson, A. and Palmberg, J-O. 1991. Optimization

for Component Selection in Hydraulic

Systems. 4th Bath International Fluid Power Workshop,

Bath, UK.

Luenberger, D. G. 1989. Linear and Nonlinear Programming,

Second Edition.

Matlab 2000. The Language of Technical Computing,

The Math Works Inc.

Merritt, H. E. 1967. Hydraulic Control Systems. J.

Wiley.

Papadopoulos, E. and Sarkar, S. 1997. The Dynamics

of an Articulated Forestry Machine and its Applications.

Proc. IEEE Int. Conference on Robotics and

Automation, pp. 323 – 328.

Papadopoulos, E. and Gonthier, Y. 2002. On the Development

of a Real-Time Simulator Engine for a

Hydraulic Forestry Machine. Int. Journal of Fluid

Power 3, No. 1, pp. 55-65.

Papadopoulos, E., Mu, B. and Frenette R. 2003. On

Modeling, Identification, and Control of a Heavy-

Duty Electrohydraulic Harvester Manipulator.

IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, Vol. 8,

No. 2, pp. 178 - 187.

Rosenberg, R. and Karnopp, D. 1983. Introduction to

Physical System Dynamics. McGraw Hill, New

York, NY.Rowell, D. and Wormley, D. 1997. System Dynamics.

Prentice Hall.

Six, K. and Lasky, T. A. 2001. A Time-Delayed Dynamic

Inversion Scheme for Mechatronic Control

of Hydraulic Systems. IEEE/ASME Int. Mechatronics

Proc., pp. 1232 – 1238.

Stewart, D. 1965-66. A platform with six degrees of

freedom. Proceedings of the IMechE, Vol. 180, Pt.

, No. 15, pp. 371-385.

Thayer, W. J. 1962. Specification Standards for Electrohydraulic

Flow Control Servovalves. Techn.

Bull. 117, Moog Inc. Control Div., E. Aurora, NY.

Van de Straete, H. J., Degezelle, P. and De Schutter,

J. 1998. Servo Motor Selection Criterion for

Mechatronic Application. IEEE/ ASME Transactions

on Mechatronics, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 43 – 50.

Downloads

Published

2004-11-01

Issue

Section

Original Article