PERFORMANCE LIMITATIONS OF A CLASS OF TWO-STAGE ELECTRO-HYDRAULIC FLOW VALVES
Keywords:
electro-hydraulic, valve, valvistor, zero, modelAbstract
By examining the dynamics of a popular type of two-stage electronic proportional valve, this paper addresses its performance limitations, with both cautions in control implementation and suggestions in valve design. While several benefits do exist, there are limitations to the closed loop performance of the valve when it is included in a valve-controlled electro-hydraulic system. These limitations come from the structural feature that the pilot flow not only con-trols but also contributes to the total flow. Although for steady state performance this design gives a higher flow effi-ciency, for dynamic performance it results in zeros in the open loop transfer function, which will limit the closed loop bandwidth of a flow control system. A non-linear analytical model of this particular type of valve is derived first. It is then simplified as a reduced order linear model with the inherit system zeros illustrated. Validation of the analysis is obtained by experimental results on a testbed.
Downloads
References
de Pennington, A., 't Mannetje, J. J., et al. 1974. The Modelling of Electro-hydraulic Control Valves and Its Influence on the Design of Electro-hydraulic Drives. Journal Mechanical Engineering Science, Vol. 16(3), pp. 196-204.
Editor 1999. Reader's Choice - Top Products of the Year. SAE Off Highway Engineering Magazine.
Nikiforuk, P. N., Ukrainetz, P. R., et al. 1969. De-tailed Analysis of a Two-Stage Four-Way Electro-hydraulic Flow-Control Valve. Journal Mechanical Engineering Science, Vol. 11(2), pp. 168-174.
Palmberg, J. and Petterson, H. 2000. Analysis of a High Bandwidth Flow Amplifier. International Symposium on Fluid Control, Measurement and Visualization, Sherbrooke, Canada.
Prasetiawan, E., Zhang, R., et al. 2001. Fundamental Performance Limitations for A Class of Electronic Two-stage Proportional Flow Valves. American Control Conference: Fluid Power Control Systems, Arlington, VA.
Prasetiawan, E. A. 2000. Modelling, Simulation and Control of an Earthmoving Vehicle Powertrain Simulator. Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Urbana-Champaign, University of Illinois.
Prasetiawan, E. A., Zhang, R., et al. 2000. Modelling and Coordinated Control of An Earthmoving Vehi-cle Powertrain. International Mechanical Engineer-ing Congress and Exposition: The Fluid Power and Systems Technology Division, Orlando, FL, ASME.
Prasetiawan, E. A., Zhang, R., et al. 1999. Modelling and Control Design of a Powertrain Simulation Testbed for Earthmoving Vehicles. International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition: The Fluid Power and Systems Technology Division, Nashville, TN, ASME.
Vickers 1994. EPV16 Series Proportional Flow Con-trols Technical Information.
Watton, J. 1989. Fluid power systems: modelling, simulation, analog and microcomputer control. New York, Prentice-Hall.
Wilkie, J., Johnson, M., et al. 2001. Control Engi-neering: "an Introductory Course", Palgrave Mac-millan.
Zavarevi, M. K., Lawrence, P. D., et al. 1999. Non-linear Modelling and Validation of Solenoid-Controlled Pilot-Operated Servovalves. IEEE/-ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, Vol. 4(3), pp. 324-334.