Automatic Fault Diagnosis Method for Hydrodynamic Control System

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13052/ijfp1439-9776.2233

Abstract

In order to improve the accuracy and speed of fault data acquisition of fluid power control system, this paper designs an automatic fault diagnosis method of fluid power control system based on English translation speech recognition. Firstly, the SDG model of the fluid dynamic control system is established, and the fault link is obtained and determined. Then the correlation dimension of data in fluid mechanics calculation is analyzed, and the fault data location is realized. On this basis, the fault classification model of the hydraulic power control system is established, and the automatic fault diagnosis of the hydraulic power control system is completed. Experiments show that the new fault diagnosis method can effectively improve the accuracy and speed of fault data acquisition of fluid power control system, the highest accuracy can reach 89.92%, the fastest speed is 11s, and improve the reliability of fault diagnosis results.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Jin Zheng, Yellow River Conservancy Technical Institute, Kaifeng, Henan, China

Jin Zheng has been engaged in English teaching for more than 14 years. She has taught courses such as intensive reading, extensive reading, scientific and technical English translation, and practical writing. In recent years, he has presided over 6 provincial scientific research items, and 5 of which have won the first prize. She has published more than 10 academic papers, edited four textbooks and academic monographs, one set of textbooks was selected into the national eleventh five-year planning textbooks.

References

Radkevich, E. V., Lukashev, E. A., Vasil’eva, O. A. Hydrodynamic Instabilities and Nonequilibrium Phase Transitions[J]. Doklady Mathematics, 2019, 99(3): 308–312.

Sun, W. J., Jiang, S., Xu, K., et al. Multiscale Simulation for the System of Radiation Hydrodynamics[J]. Journal of Scientific Computing, 2020, 85(2): 1–24.

Tan, W.K. Two-velocity hydrodynamics in fluid mechanics: global existence for 2D case[J]. Nonlinearity, 2021, 34(2): 964–988.

Kambe, T. New perspectives on mass conservation law and waves in fluid mechanics[J]. Fluid Dynamics Research, 2020, 52(3): 031401.

Castillo, Z. J. J., Camarillo, G. K. A., Pérez, S. G. I., et al. Mini-AUV Hydrodynamic Parameters Identification via CFD Simulations and Their Application on Control Performance Evaluation[J]. Sensors, 2021, 21(3): 820–820.

Mittendorf, M., Papanikolaou, A. D. Hydrodynamic hull form optimization of fast catamarans using surrogate models[J]. Ship Technology Research, 2021, 68(1): 14–26.

Jean, R., Ren, F., Zhang, W., et al. Deep reinforcement learning in fluid mechanics: A promising method for both active flow control and shape optimization[J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2020, 32(4–5): 234–246.

Troy, S., Minel, B. A CFD-Based Frequency Response Method Applied in the Determination of Dynamic Coefficients of Hydrodynamic Bearings. Part 1: Theory[J]. Lubricants, 2019, 7(3): 23.

de Silva, C. M., Szydzik, C., Mitchell, A., et al. Experimental fluid dynamics characterization of a novel micropump-mixer.[J]. Biomicrofluidics, 2020, 14(4): 044116–044116.

Tateno, M., Yanagishima, T., Russo, J., et al. Influence of Hydrodynamic Interactions on Colloidal Crystallization.[J]. Physical review letters, 2019, 123(25): 258002.

Yang, Z. H., Wang, S. H., Ma, C., et al. Development of fault diagnosis system for wind power planetary transmission based on labview[J]. The Journal of Engineering, 2019, 2019(23): 9170–9172.

Zhu, H. B., He, Z. M., Wei, J. H., et al. Bearing Fault Feature Extraction and Fault Diagnosis Method Based on Feature Fusion[J]. Sensors, 2021, 21(7): 2524–2524.

Mallikarjuna, P. B., Sreenatha, M., Manjunath, S., et al. Aircraft Gearbox Fault Diagnosis System: An Approach based on Deep Learning Techniques[J]. Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2020, 30(1): 258–272.

Shabbir, N., Kütt, L., Asad, B., et al. Spectrum Analysis for Condition Monitoring and Fault Diagnosis of Ventilation Motor: A Case Study[J]. Energies, 2021, 14(7): 2001–2001.

Lin, M. C., Han, P. Y., Fan, Y. H., et al. Development of Compound Fault Diagnosis System for Gearbox Based on Convolutional Neural Network.[J]. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020, 20(21): 6169–6169.

Piedad, E. J., Chen, Y. T., Chang, H. C., et al. Frequency Occurrence Plot-Based Convolutional Neural Network for Motor Fault Diagnosis[J]. Electronics, 2020, 9(10): 1711–1711.

Jang, G. B., Cho, S. B. Feature Space Transformation for Fault Diagnosis of Rotating Machinery under Different Working Conditions[J]. Sensors, 2021, 21(4): 1417–1417.

Paolo, C., Mirko, P., Fabio, S., et al. A Vibration Signal-Based Method for Fault Identification and Classification in Hydraulic Axial Piston Pumps[J]. Energies, 2019, 12(5): 953.

Park, J., Park, Y. Experimental Verification of Fault Identification for Overactuated System With a Scaled-Down Electric Vehicle[J]. International Journal of Automotive Technology, 2020, 21(4): 1037–1045.

Hamid, R. K., Wang, Y. Y., Shi, P. Special Issue on ‘SMC based observation, identification, uncertainties compensation and fault detection’[J]. Asian Journal of Control, 2019, 21(1): 1–2.

Wu, L., Wu, L. Research on Business English Translation Framework Based on Speech Recognition and Wireless Communication[J]. Mobile Information Systems, 2021(4): 1–11.

Downloads

Published

2021-07-19

How to Cite

Zheng, J. (2021). Automatic Fault Diagnosis Method for Hydrodynamic Control System. International Journal of Fluid Power, 22(3), 357–372. https://doi.org/10.13052/ijfp1439-9776.2233

Issue

Section

Fluid Power Components & Systems