ROUTING EFFICIENCY IN WIRELESS SENSOR-ACTOR NETWORKS CONSIDERING SEMI-AUTOMATED ARCHITECTURE

Authors

  • LEONARD BAROLLI Department of Communication and Information Engineering, Fukuoka Institute of Technology (FIT), 3-30-1 Wajiro-Higashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka 811-0295, Japan
  • TAO YANG Graduate School of Engineering, Fukuoka Institute of Technology (FIT), 3-30-1 Wajiro-Higashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka 811-0295, Japan
  • GJERGJI MINO Graduate School of Engineering, Fukuoka Institute of Technology (FIT), 3-30-1 Wajiro-Higashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka 811-0295, Japan
  • FATOS XHAFA Department of Languages and Informatics Systems, Technical University of Catalonia, C/Jordi Girona 1-3, 08034 Barcelona, Spain
  • ARJAN DURRESI Department of Computer and Information Science, Indiana University Purdue University at Indianapolis (IUPUI), 723 W. Michigan Street SL 280, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA

Keywords:

Sensor networks, sensor-actor networks, AODV, DSR, MANET

Abstract

Wireless networks have become increasingly popular and advances in wireless communi- cations and electronics have enabled the development of different kind of networks such as Mobile Ad-hoc Networks (MANETs), Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) and Wireless Sensor-Actor Networks (WSANs). These networks have different kind of characteristics, therefore new protocols that fit their features should be developed. We have developed a simulation system to test MANETs, WSNs and WSANs. In this paper, we consider the performance behavior of two protocols: AODV and DSR using TwoRayGround model and Shadowing model for lattice and random topologies. We study the routing efficiency and compare the performance of two protocols for different scenarios. By computer sim- ulations, we found that for large number of nodes when we used TwoRayGround model and random topology, the DSR protocol has a better performance. However, when the transmission rate is higher, the routing efficiency parameter is unstable.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. Durresi, V. Paruchuri, M. Durresi, Leonard Barolli (2006), Qos-Energy Aware Broadcast for

Heterogeneous Wireless Ad Hoc Networks, Journal of Mobile Multimedia, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 344-

T. R. Sheltami (2008), Performance Evaluation of H.264 Protocol in Ad Hoc Networks, Journal

of Mobile Multimedia, Vol.4 No.1 pp. 59-70.

V. Pham, E. Larsen, O. Kure and P. Engelstad (2009), Routing of Internal MANET Traffic over

External Networks, Mobile Information Systems, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 291-311.

M. Ikeda, L. Barolli, G. De Marco, T. Yang, A. Durresi, F. Xhafa (2009), Tools for Performance

Assessment of OLSR Protocol, Mobile Information Systems, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 165-176.

S. Mahfoudh, P. Minet (2009), Maximization of Energy Efficiency in Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor

Networks with SERENA, Mobile Information Systems, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 33-52.

A. M. Hanashi, I. Awan, M. Woodward (2009) Performance Evaluation with Different Mobility

Models for Dynamic Probabilistic Flooding in MANETs, Mobile Information Systems, Vol. 5, No.

, pp. 65-80.

I. F. Akyildiz and I. H. Kasimoglu (2004), Wireless Sensor and Actor Networks: Research Chal-

lenges, Ad Hoc Networks Journal (Elsevier), Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 351-367.

O. Younis and S. Fahmy (2004), HEED: A Hybrid, Energy-efficient, Distributed Clustering Ap-

proach for Ad-hoc Sensor Networks, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp.

-379.

W. Ye, J. Heidemann, and D. Estrin (2004), Medium Access Control with Coordinated Adaptive

Sleeping for Wireless Sensor Networks, IEEE/ACM Transaction Networking, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp.

-506.

¨ O. B. Akan and I. F. Akyildiz (2005), Event-to-sink Reliable Transport in Wireless Sensor Net-

works, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, Vol. 13, No. 5, pp. 1003-1016.

M. C. Vuran, V. C. Gungor, O. B. Akan (2005), On the Interdependency of Con-

gestion and Contention in Wireless Sensor Networks, Proc. of CST SenMetrics-2005,

http://www.cse.unl.edu/mcvuran/Interdep-SenMetrics.pdf.

S. Giordano, C. Rosenberg (2006), Topics in Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks, IEEE Communication

Magazine, Vol. 44, No. 4, pp. 97-97.

J. N. Al-Karaki, A. E. Kamal (2004), Routing Techniques in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Survey,

IEEE Wireless Communication, Vol. 11, No. 6, pp. 6-28.

C. Perkins (Editor) (2001), Ad Hoc Networks, Addison-Wesley.

F. Dresslera, I. Dietricha, R. Germana, B. Krugerb (2009), A Rule-based System for Programming

Self-organized Sensor and Actor Networks, Computer Networks, Vol. 53, No. 10, pp. 1737-1750.

T. Melodia, D. Pompili, V. C. Gungor, I. F. Akyildiz (2005), A Distributed Coordination Frame-

work for Wireless Sensor and Actor Networks, Pror. of 6th ACM International Symposium on

Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing, Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA, pp. 99-110.

G.W. Allen, K. Lorincz, O. Marcillo, J. Johnson, M. Ruiz and J. Lees (2006), Deploying a Wireless

Sensor Network on an Active Volcano, IEEE Internet Computing, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 18-25.

C. Cooper (1993), A Note on the Connectivity of 2-regular Digraphs, Random Structures Algo-

rithms, Vol. 4, pp. 469-472.

T. Yang, G. De Marco, M. Ikeda, and L. Barolli (2006), A Case Study of Event Detection in

Lattice Wireless Sensor Network with Shadowing-induced Radio Irregularities, Proc. of the 4-th

International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing and Multimedia (MoMM-2006), pp.

-250.

I. Donward (2004), NRL’s Sensor Network Extension to NS-2, Available on line at http://pf.itd.

nrl.navy.mil/nrlsensorsim/.

Crossbow Technology, Inc., Available on Line at http://www.xbow.com/.

T.S. Rappaport (Editor) (2001), Wireless Communications, Prentice Hall PTR.

Downloads

Published

2010-01-24

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>