Optimization of components and layouts of hydromechanical transmissions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1080/14399776.2017.1296746Keywords:
Hydromechanical transmission, layout optimisation, input coupled CVT, output coupled CVTAbstract
In the agricultural and work machine sectors, hydromechanical transmission competes with traditional mechanical transmission. However, the double energy conversion taking place in hydrostatic transmission lowers the efficiency of the entire transmission. Thus, the dimensioning of hydromechanical transmission must not only meet the functional requirements of speed and power to be transmitted, but must also identify the particular combination of layout and the components that leads to the maximum efficiency. In this study, a general answer to this problem will be given. The design is transformed into a mathematical programming problem, whose goal is the optimisation of both the configuration and internal components of the transmission. The structure of the transmissions is described by means of graph theory, and the resolution of the optimisation problem is obtained by means of a ‘direct search’ algorithm based on the swarm method.
Downloads
References
Blake C., Ivantysynova M., and Williams K., 2006.
Comparison of operational characteristics in power
split continuously variable transmissions. In: 2006 SAE
commercial vehicle engineering congress & exhibition. SAE
Technical Paper no. 2006-01-3468. Rosemont, IL.
Bosch-Rexroth, 2009. Data sheet for Axial Piston Variable
Motors RE 91604/07.09.
Casoli P., et al., 2007. A numerical model for the simulation
of Diesel/CVT Power Split transmission. In: ICE2007 8th
international conference on engines for automobiles. SAE
Technical Paper no. 2007-24-0137. Capri, Italy.
Jarchow, F., 1964. Leistungsverzweigte Getriebe (Power split
transmissions). VDI-Z, 106 (6), 196–205.
Kirejczyk J., 1984. Continuously variable hydromechanical
transmission for commercial vehicle by simulation studies.
SAE Technical paper no. 845095, FISTIA congress, Vienna,
Austria.
Krauss A. and Ivantysynova M., 2004. Power split
transmissions versus hydrostatic multiple motor concepts
– A comparative analysis. In: 2004 SAE commercial vehicle
engineering congress & exhibition. SAE Technical Paper no.
-01-2676.
Kress, J.H., 1968. Hydrostatic power splitting transmissions
for wheeled vehicles – classification and theory of operation.
SAE Technical Paper no. 680549. Warrendale, PA: Society
of Automotive Engineers.
Linares, P., Mendez, V., and Catalan, H., 2010. Design
parameters for continuously variable power-split
transmissions using planetaries with 3 active shafts.
Journal of terramechanics, 47, 323–335.
Macor, A. and Rossetti, A., 2011. Optimization of hydromechanical
power split transmissions. Mechanism and
machine theory, 46 (12), 1901–1919.
Macor, A. and Rossetti, A., 2013. Fuel consumption reduction
in urban buses by using power split transmissions. Energy
conversion and management, 71, 159–171.
Macor, A., Rossetti, A., and Scamperle, M., 2016. Prediction
of sound pressure level for a dual-stage hydromechanical
transmission. International journal of fluid power, 17 (1),
–35.
Mikeska D. and Ivantysynova M., 2002. Virtual prototyping
of power split drives. In: Proceedings of bath workshop on
power transmission and motion control, Bath, UK, 95–111.
Nelder, J.A. and Mead, R., 1965. A simplex method for
function minimization. Computer journal, 7, 308–313.
Renius, K.T. and Resch R., 2005. Continuously variable tractor
transmissions. ASAE distinguished lecture series. Tractor
Design no. 29. Louisville, KY.
Rossetti, A. and Macor, A., 2013. Multi-objective optimization
of hydro-mechanical power split transmissions.
Mechanism and machine theory, 62 (4), 112–128.
Fan, S.-K.S., Liang, Y.-C., and Zahara, E., 2014. A genetic
algorithm and a particle swarm optimizer hybridized with
Nelder–Mead simplex search. Computers & industrial
engineering, 50, 401–425.
Sung, D., Hwang, S., and Kim, H., 2005. Design of
hydromechanical transmission using network analysis.
Proceedings of the institution of mechanical engineers, part
D: journal of automobile engineering, 219 (1), 53–63.