Improved sizing of hydraulic servo-drives through inverse simulation approach using Modelica and modified OpenHydraulics library

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1080/14399776.2015.1107386

Keywords:

Inverse simulation, inverse dynamics, fluid power, design, Modelica, hydraulic servo-drive, efficiency, simulation, equation based modeling, design optimization, gear hobbing machine, sizing problem

Abstract

The inverse dynamic simulation allows a designer to test the dynamic performance of a closed loop controlled drive without the need to parametrize a feedback controller. Equation based object oriented modeling languages such as Modelica are suitable to build models that can be simulated both, in a forward or inverse fashion. The same model can be used to simulate either in forward fashion or inversely, depending purely on which boundary conditions are specified. To evaluate the usefulness and limitations of the inverse simulation approach for the sizing of a hydraulic servo drive, an open source Modelica library OpenHydraulics is modified to enable inverse simulation. The library is then used for a case study about the sizing of a valve/cylinder hydraulic servo-drive. The inverse simulation supports an intuitive, iterative design approach towards the sizing problem of closed loop controlled drives, such as hydraulic or electric servo drives. The designer can change the size of system components and at any time assess the drive’s efficiency for a typical loading cycle without the need to implement feedback control. It is shown in a test case of an existing hydraulic servo drive of a tooling machine, how changes in design parameters can be instructed through using the inverse simulation approach. In this case, the energy losses could be decreased by 69 %.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ambros, M., 2011. Engineering tool SIZER. In: Antriebstag

Fürth: Siemens Kundenveranstaltung.

Bals, J., et al., 2003. Object-Oriented Inverse Modelling of

Multi-Domain Aircraft Equipment Systems with Modelica.

In: Proceedings of the 3 International Modelica Conference,

November 3-4, 2003 Linköping, 377–384.

Bideaux, E., et al., 2005. Design of a hybrid vehicle powertrain

using an inverse methodology. In: C.R. Burrows, K.A. Edge

and D.N. Johnson, eds. Power transmission and motion

control 2005. Fürth: John Whiley & Sons Inc, 317–332.

Buchholz, J.J. and von Grünhagen, W., 2007. Inversion

Impossible? Munich: GRIN Publishing GmbH.

Carpanzano, E. and Maffezzoni, C., 1998. Symbolic manipulation

techniques for model simplification in object-oriented

modelling of large scale continuous systems. Mathematics

and computers in simulation, 48, 133–150.

Casella, F., 2011. Symbolic manipulation for the simulation of

object-oriented models, last downloaded Jan 2015.

Cellier, F. and Elmqvist, H., 1993. Automated formula manipulation

supports object-oriented continuous-system modeling.

Control Systems, IEEE, 13, 28–38.

Clayton, G., et al., 2008. Inverse-feedforward of charge-controlled

piezopositioners, Mechatronics 18273–281, special

Section on Optimized System Performances Through

Balanced Control Strategies The 4th IFAC Symposium on

Mechatronic Systems G Mechatronics 2006

Devasia, S., 2002. Should model-based inverse inputs be used

as feedforward under plant uncertainty? Automatic Control,

IEEE Transactions on, 47, 1865–1871.

Feki, M.E., et al., 2008. Structural properties of inverse models

represented by bond graph. In: Proceedings of the 17th

world congress, the international federation of automatic

control, July 6-11, 2008 Seoul, Korea: 236–241.

Fritzson, P., 2014. Principles of object-oriented modeling and

simulation with modelica 3.3: A cyber-physical approach.

Piscataway: Wiley-IEEE Press.

Gräber, M., 2014. Exploiting actuator limits with feedforward

control based on inverse models. In: Proceedings of the

th international modelica conference, March 10-12,

, Lund, Sweden: 637–645.

Hess, R.A., Gao, C. and Wang, S.H., 1991. Generalized technique

for inverse simulation applied to aircraft maneuvers.

Journal for guidance, control, and dynamics, 14, 920–926.

Jelali, M., 2003. Hydraulic servo systems: Modelling, idendification

and control, London: Springer.

Liermann, M., 2012. Backward simulation - A tool for

designing more efficient mechatronic systems. In:

Proceedings of the 9th International MODELICA Conference,

September 3-5, 2012, Munich, Germany, 867–876.

Liermann, M. and Murrenhoff, H., 2005. Knowledge based

tools for the design of servo-hydraulic closed loop control,

In: International symposium on power transmission and

motion control (PTMC), Bath, England, 17–28.

Luca, A.D. and Book, W., 2008. Springer handbook of robotics,

chapter 13. Berlin-Heilderberg: Springer, 287–317.

Markel, T., et al., 2002. Advisor: A systems analysis tool for

advanced vehicle modeling. Journal of power sources, 110,

–266.

Merrit, H.E., 1967. Hydraulic control systems, New York, NY:

John Whiley & Sons Inc.

Murray-Smith, D., 2000. The inverse simulation approach: a

focused review of methods and applications. Mathematics

and computers in simulation, 53, 239–247.

Murray-Smith, D.J., 2011. Feedback methods for inverse

simulation of dynamic models for engineering systems

applications. Mathematical and Computer Modelling of

Dynamical Systems, 17, 515-541.

Murray-Smith, D.J., 2014. Inverse simulation and analysis of

underwater vehicle dynamics using feedback principles.

Mathematical and computer modelling of dynamical

systems, 20, 45-56.

Murrenhoff, H., 2008. Servohydraulik - geregelte hydraulische

Antriebe [Servo-hydraulics - closed loop controlled

hydraulic drives]. Aachen: Shaker Verlag.

Paredis, C.J.J., 2008. An open-source modelica library of fluid

power models, in Fluid Power and Motion. Control, 2008,

–90.

Paredis, C.J.J., 2014. Openhydraulics,

Saad, J. and Liermann, M., 2013. Inverse dynamic simulation

of a hydraulic drive with modelica. In: Proceedings of the

ASME 2013 international mechanical engineering congress

& exposition, San Diego: ASME IMECE: 63310

Schlemmer, K. and Murrenhoff, H., 2007. A concept of a

knowledge-based assistance system for servohydraulic drive

design. In: Proceedings of IMECE2007 ASME international

mechanical engineering congress and exposition, Seattle,

Washington, USA, pp. IMECE2007-41402

Tagawa, Y., Tu, J.Y. and Stoten, D.P., 2011. Inverse dynamics

compensation via Gsimulation of feedback control systems.

Proceedings of the institution of mechanical engineers,

Part I: Journal of systems and control engineering, 225,

–153.

Thümmel, M., et al., 2005. Nonlinear inverse models for

control. In: Proceedings of the 4th international modelica

conference, March 7-8, 2005 Hamburg: 267–279.

Watton, J., 2009. Fundamentals of fluid power control, New York:

Cambridge University Press.

Wipke, K., Cuddy, M. and Burch, S., 1999. Advisor 2.1: a

user-friendly advanced powertrain simulation using a combined

backward/forward approach, Vehicular Technology.

IEEE Transactions on, 48 , 1751–1761.

Downloads

Published

2015-11-01

How to Cite

Saad, J., & Liermann, M. (2015). Improved sizing of hydraulic servo-drives through inverse simulation approach using Modelica and modified OpenHydraulics library. International Journal of Fluid Power, 16(3), 163–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/14399776.2015.1107386

Issue

Section

Original Article