Variable-Speed Pump-Controlled Three-chamber Cylinder System for Hydraulic Boom with Feed-Forward LADRC
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13052/ijfp1439-9776.2533Keywords:
Hydraulic boom, variable-speed pump-controlled, three-chamber cylinder, speed feed-forward, LADRC, Energy recoveryAbstract
With the increasing fossil fuel crisis and environmental degradation, energy-saving has been one of the fluid power transmissions’ priority research areas. In a conventional hydraulic boom, throttling and potential energy losses result in poor energy efficiency and extra rising of fluid temperature. To boost the energy efficiency of a hydraulic boom, this paper proposed a variable-speed pump-controlled three-chamber cylinder system for hydraulic boom with feed-forward plus linear active disturbance rejection control (LADRC). In the proposed system, chambers A and B of the three-chamber cylinder are controlled by two variable-speed fixed-displacement pumps and the third chamber C is connected to a hydraulic accumulator to balance the weight of the boom. Firstly, the model of the variable-speed pump-controlled three-chamber cylinder system is built in Matlab/Simulink. Further, the mechanical model of a 1-ton excavator is established, and the proposed system is applied to the boom. Secondly, a compound controller combining speed feed-forward and LADRC is designed. Thirdly, simulations were performed under boom up and down while keeping the arm and bucket cylinders fully retracted. The position control performance and energy consumption are analysed and compared. The results show that, compared to the PID and speed feed-forward PID control, the proposed controller has a lower position tracking error (less than 2.66%). Compared with the variable-speed pump-controlled differential cylinder system, the proposed system can save energy by 43.51% when considering energy recovery. Therefore, the proposed system has good position tracking performance and has the potential to be applied to different types of heavy-lifting equipment driven by hydraulic cylinders.
Downloads
References
Quan Long. Current State, Problems and the Innovative Solution of Electro-hydraulic Technology of Pump Controlled Cylinder[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2008, 44(11): 87–92.
Lodewyks J, Zurbrugg P. Decentralized energy-saving hydraulic concepts for mobile working machines[C]/10th International Fluid Power Conference, Dresden, Germany, March 8–10, 2016(1):79–90.
Kagoshima M, Komiyama M, Nanjo T, et al. Development of new hybrid excavator[J]. Kobelco Technology Review, 2007, 27(27):39–42.
Altare G, Vacca A. Design Solution for Efficient and Compact Electro-hydraulic Actuators[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2015, 106:8–16.
Schneider K, Liebherr P. Hybrid Power Booster: Energy Recovery and Increased Performance with Hybrid Drive System[C]. 7th AVL International Commercial Powertrain Conference: 2013. 59–64.
Ho, Triet Hung, and K. K. Ahn. Design and control of a closed-loop hydraulic energy-regenerative system[J]. Automation in Construction. 2012(22): 444–458.
Nezhadali V, Frank B, Eriksson L. Wheel loader operation-Optimal control compared to real drive experience [J]. Control Engineering Practice, 2016, 48: 1–9.
Cetinkunt S, Pinsopon U, Chen C, et al. Positive flow control of closed-center electrohydraulic implement-by-wire systems for mobile equipment applications[J]. Mechatronics, 2004, 14(4): 403–420.
Hippalgaonkar R, Ivantysynova M. Fuel savings of a mini-excavator through a hydraulic hybrid displacement-controlled system[C]//Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Fluid Power (IFK). 2012:139–153.
Tony Thomas, A. et al. Improved Position Tracking Performance of Electro Hydraulic Actuator Using PID and Sliding Mode Controller[J]. IETE Journal of Research, 2019(68): 1683–1695.
Kim K Y, Jang D S, Cho Y L, et al. Development of Electro-Hydraulic Control Valve for Intelligent Excavator[C]. 2009 ICCAS-SICE, Fukuoka, Japan, 2009. 2212–2216.
Krstiæ, Miroslav. On the applicability of PID control to nonlinear second-order systems[J]. National Science Review 2017 (4): 668–668.
Patre P M, Mackunis W, Dupree K, et al. Modular Adaptive Control of Uncertain Euler–Lagrange Systems With Additive Disturbances[J]. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2011(1):56.
Plestan F, Shtessel Y, Brégeault, Vincent, et al. Sliding mode control with gain adaptation – Application to an electropneumatic actuator[J]. Control Engineering Practice, 2013, 21(5):679–688.
Rubaai A, Castro-Sitiriche M J, Ofoli A R. Design and Implementation of Parallel Fuzzy PID Controller for High-Performance Brushless Motor Drives: An Integrated Environment for Rapid Control Prototyping[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 2008, 44(4):1090–1098.
Seung H C, Siegfried H. Robust motion control of a clamp-cylinder for energy-saving injection moulding machines[J]. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation. 2008(22): 2445–2453.
Alleyne A, Hedrick J K. Nonlinear adaptive control of active suspensions[J]. Control Systems Technology, IEEE Transactions on. 1995, 3(1): 94–101.
Le V A, Le H X and Nguyen L, et al. An efficient adaptive hierarchical sliding mode control strategy using neural networks for 3Doverhead cranes[J]. International Journal of Automation & Computing, 2019, 16(5):614–627.
U Liping, Cai Liujin & Li Jian, et al. Control Strategy of Electro -hydraulic Position Servo System for Surface Milling Machine Based on Active Disturbance Rejection Control[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2018, 24 (11):122–130.
Wu Hongtao. Self-interference control of permanent magnet synchronous motor based on feedforward compensation and motor parameter identification[D]. Hunan University of Technology, 2021.
Chi Shiwei, Liu Huibo. ADRC Control of Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Based on the Feedforward Compensation[J]. Motor and control applications, 2023, 50(1):5.
Han J.Q. From PID to active disturbance rejection control[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2009, 56(3):900–906.
Han Jingqing. Active Disturbance Rejection Control Technique[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2008.
Xiao Yougang, Lu Hao and Yu Yi, et al. WADRC for anti-swing positioning of underactuated crane with one parameter tuning[J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2019, 50(11):2074–2711.
Raul-Cristian Roman, Radu-Emil Precup and Emil M. Petriu. Hybrid data-driven fuzzy active disturbance rejection control for tower crane systems[J]. European Journal of Control, 2021, 58:373–387.
Cao X, Wang Z and Zhang X. Precise locating control for a polar crane based on sliding mode active disturbance rejection control and quadratic programming algorithm[J]. Machines, 2021, 9(2):22.
Gao Z Q. Scaling and bandwidth-parameterization based on control tuning[C]. //Proceedings of the American Control Conference. Denver, Colorado: IEEE, 2003: 4989–499.
Agostini T, De Negri V, Minav T, et al. Effect of Energy Recovery on Efficiency in Electro-hydrostatic Closed System for Differential Actuator[J]. Actuators. MDPI, 2020, 9(1):12.
Siwek M, Baranowski L, Panasiuk J, et al. Modeling and Simulation of Movement of Dispersed Group of Mobile Robots Using Simscape Multibody Software [C] // AIP Conference Proceedings. 2019, 2078: 020045-1–020045-5.
Zhang Fengrong. Position and Speed Compound Control Method for Unidirectional Speed-variable Constant Pump-controlled Differential Cylinder[D]. Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2017.
SlGuolei, Shen Yingqi and Wang Jialei, et al. Active Disturbance Rejection Control of Electro-hydraulic Position Servo System[J]. Chinese Hydraulics & Pneumatics, 2020, (12):14–21.
Chen X, Li D, Gao Z, et al. Tuning method for second-order active disturbance rejection control[C]. 2011 30th Chinese Control Conference (CCC). IEEE, 2011:6322–6327.