Review of Fault Detection and Diagnosis Methods including Failure Root Causes of Major Components of Hydraulic Pitch System for Wind Turbines Part-II
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13052/ijfp1439-9776.2644Keywords:
Hydraulic Pitch System, Wind Turbine, Fault Tree Analysis, Failure Root CausesAbstract
The hydraulic pitch system is a critical component of modern wind turbines, responsible for both power regulation and safety mechanisms. Ensuring the reliability and availability of this system is essential for optimal turbine performance. This study focuses on the reliability of less active yet essential components within the hydraulic pitch system, including the pump, accumulator, relief valve, hose, and hydraulic oil. The hydraulic oil in the analysis has been treated as a component also. Employing a comprehensive Fault Tree Analysis (FTA), this study identifies the failure modes, effects, and root causes of these components. Key findings indicate that contamination and inadequate maintenance are primary contributors to failures. The study discusses various fault identification and condition monitoring algorithms, including those based on artificial intelligence and machine learning, which are effective in post-processing data for fault detection. Physics-based models, such as observer methods like the Kalman Filter, show potential for real-time implementation. The findings underscore the importance of stringent filtration, regular inspections, and proactive maintenance strategies, including monitoring accumulator pre-charge pressure and using appropriate hydraulic oil. Addressing these root causes can significantly enhance the reliability and longevity of hydraulic pitch systems, thereby improving the overall performance and safety of wind turbines.
Downloads
References
Wrat et al. [2025] Gyan Wrat, Mohit Bhola, Diego M. Chamorro, Jesper Liniger, and Henrik C. Pedersen. Review of fault detection and diagnosis methods including failure root causes of major components of hydraulic pitch system for wind turbines-part-i. International Journal of Fluid Power, 2025. ISSN 2332-1180.
Yang et al. [2022] Yanfang Yang, Lei Ding, Jinhua Xiao, Guinan Fang, and Jia Li. Current status and applications for hydraulic pump fault diagnosis: A review. Sensors, 22(24):9714, 2022.
Hydraulic Pumps: Types, Principles and Applications — iqsdirectory.com. https://www.iqsdirectory.com/articles/hydraulic-pump.html.
Shen et al. [2018] Haidong Shen, Zhiqiang Li, Lele Qi, and Liang Qiao. A method for gear fatigue life prediction considering the internal flow field of the gear pump. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 99:921–929, 2018.
Fabiś-Domagała [2017] Joanna Fabiś-Domagała. Analysis of defects and failures of hydraulic gear pumps with the use of selected qualitative methods. Tribologia, 272(2):33–38, 2017.
Li and Limmer [2000] C James Li and JD Limmer. Model-based condition index for tracking gear wear and fatigue damage. Wear, 241(1):26–32, 2000.
Wellman and Torres [2023] Chris Wellman and Ivan Torres. Lubrication and its role in gear failure analysis. Gear Solutions Magazine, November 2023. URL https://gearsolutions.com/features/lubrication-and-its-role-in-gear-failure-analysis/
Lee et al. [2021] Geon-Hui Lee, Ugochukwu Ejike Akpudo, and Jang-Wook Hur. Fmeca and mfcc-based early wear detection in gear pumps in cost-aware monitoring systems. Electronics, 10(23):2939, 2021.
Hemati and Shooshtari [2020] Ali Hemati and Alireza Shooshtari. Gear pump root cause failure analysis using vibrations analysis and signal processing. Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention, 20:1815–1818, 2020.
Vuorinen [2021] Elina Vuorinen. Failure analysis of hydraulic pumps. B.S. thesis, Tampere University, Finland, 2021.
Liu et al. [2015] Zengkai Liu, Yonghong Liu, Hongkai Shan, Baoping Cai, and Qing Huang. A fault diagnosis methodology for gear pump based on eemd and bayesian network. PLOS ONE, 10(5):1–15, 05 2015. URL https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125703.
Liao et al. [2022] Jian Liao, Jianbo Zheng, and Zongbin Chen. Research on the fault diagnosis method of an internal gear pump based on a convolutional auto-encoder and pso-lssvm. Sensors, 22(24):9841, 2022.
Lakshmanan et al. [2023] Kayal Lakshmanan, Fabrizio Tessicini, Antonio J Gil, and Ferdinando Auricchio. A fault prognosis strategy for an external gear pump using machine learning algorithms and synthetic data generation methods. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 123:348–372, 2023.
Zheng et al. [2023] Jianbo Zheng, Jian Liao, and Yaqin Zhu. Two-stage multi-channel fault detection and remaining useful life prediction model of internal gear pumps based on robust-resnet. Sensors, 23(5):2395, 2023.
Randal [2011] RB Randal. Vibration-based condition monitoring industrial, aerospace and automotive applications. John Wiley & Sons, 2(11), 2011.
Lee et al. [2022] Myeong-Seok Lee, Tanvir Alam Shifat, and Jang-Wook Hur. Kalman filter assisted deep feature learning for rul prediction of hydraulic gear pump. IEEE Sensors Journal, 22(11):11088–11097, 2022.
Yu et al. [2019] He Yu, Hongru Li, Yaolong Li, and Yifan Li. A novel improved full vector spectrum algorithm and its application in multi-sensor data fusion for hydraulic pumps. Measurement, 133:145–161, 2019.
Lu and Huang [2020] Yan Lu and Zhiping Huang. A new hybrid model of sparsity empirical wavelet transform and adaptive dynamic least squares support vector machine for fault diagnosis of gear pump. Advances in mechanical engineering, 12(5):1687814020922047, 2020.
Guo et al. [2020] Rui Guo, Yongtao Li, Lijiang Zhao, Jingyi Zhao, and Dianrong Gao. Remaining useful life prediction based on the bayesian regularized radial basis function neural network for an external gear pump. IEEE Access, 8:107498–107509, 2020.
Engineering et al. [1979] Boeing Engineering, Construction Company, Lewis Research Center, and United States. Department of Energy. Distributed Solar Technology Division. MOD-2 wind turbine systems concept and preliminary design report, volume 2. Department of Energy, Distributed Solar Technology Division, 1979.
Yasar and Sevil [2012] Pancar Yasar and Ergur H. Sevil. Troubleshooting for relief valves used in hydraulic systems. Scientific Proceedings IX International Congress ”Machines, Technologies, Materials”, 2012. ISSN 1310-3946.
What Is a Pressure Relief Valve — finotek.com. https://www.finotek.com/what-is-a-pressure-relief-valve/.
Yin et al. [2024] Hao Yin, He Xu, Weiwang Fan, and Feng Sun. Fault diagnosis of pressure relief valve based on improved deep residual shrinking network. Measurement, 224:113752, 2024.
Irizar and Andreasen [2017] Victor Irizar and Casper Schousboe Andreasen. Hydraulic pitch control system for wind turbines: Advanced modeling and verification of an hydraulic accumulator. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 79:1–22, 2017.
Pelin et al. [2018] R I Pelin, P D Bârsănescu, and I Tiţa. Hydraulic systems used for pitch control of wind turbines: a literature overview. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, volume 444, page 042013. IOP Publishing, 2018.
Ulery and Sage [2020] Tom Ulery and Jeff Sage. Improve wind turbine safety with a piston accumulator retrofit, 2020. URL https://www.powermag.com/improve-wind-turbine-safety-with-a-piston-accumulator-retrofit/. Accessed: May 13, 2024.
Casey [n.d.] Brendan Casey. Advice for maintaining hydraulic accumulators. https://www.machinerylubrication.com/Read/2305/hydraulic-accumulators, n.d. Accessed: 2025-09-11.
Liniger et al. [2017a] Jesper Liniger, Nariman Sepehri, Mohsen Soltani, and Henrik C Pedersen. Signal-based gas leakage detection for fluid power accumulators in wind turbines. Energies, 10(3):331, 2017a.
Liniger et al. [2017b] Jesper Liniger, Henrik C Pedersen, and Mohsen Soltani. Model-based estimation of gas leakage for fluid power accumulators in wind turbines. In Fluid Power Systems Technology, volume 58332, page V001T01A024. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2017b.
Asmussen et al. [2022] Magnus F Asmussen, Jesper Liniger, Nariman Sepehri, and Henrik C Pedersen. Pre-charge pressure estimation of a hydraulic accumulator using surface temperature measurements. Wind, 2(4):784–800, 2022.
Elorza et al. [2021] Iker Elorza, Iker Arrizabalaga, Aritz Zubizarreta, Héctor Martín-Aguilar, Aron Pujana-Arrese, and Carlos Calleja. A sensor data processing algorithm for wind turbine hydraulic pitch system diagnosis. Energies, 15(1):33, 2021.
Pichler et al. [2020] Kurt Pichler, Rainer Haas, Christian Kastl, Andreas Plöckinger, and Paul Foschum. Comparison of fault detection methods for a hydraulic accumulator loading circuit. In 2020 IEEE Conference on Industrial Cyberphysical Systems (ICPS), volume 1, pages 117–122. IEEE, 2020.
Helwig et al. [2015] Nikolai Helwig, Eliseo Pignanelli, and Andreas Schütze. Condition monitoring of a complex hydraulic system using multivariate statistics. In 2015 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC) Proceedings, pages 210–215. IEEE, 2015.
Park et al. [2022] Min-Ho Park, Sabyasachi Chakraborty, Quang Dao Vuong, Dong-Hyeon Noh, Ji-Woong Lee, Jae-Ung Lee, Jae-Hyuk Choi, and Won-Ju Lee. Anomaly detection based on time series data of hydraulic accumulator. Sensors, 22(23):9428, 2022.
Lu et al. [2021] Changbo Lu, Hua Li, Bin Zhang, Mengyi Wang, and Chunhua Xiong. Research status of hydraulic oil evaluation technology. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, volume 1983, page 012035. IOP Publishing, 2021.
Zhou et al. [2020] Xinda Zhou, Zhaojun Yang, Hailong Tian, Chuanhai Chen, Liding Wang, Yongfu Zhu, and Jia Liu. Reliability optimization design of hydraulic system considering oil contamination. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 34:5041–5051, 2020.
Chen et al. [2019] Chuanhai Chen, Junqi Long, Hailong Tian, Zhaojun Yang, Shizheng Li, Xinda Zhou, and DaChuan Wang. Reliability modeling for hydraulic components of heavy duty machine tools based on degradation path for oil contamination. In 2019 4th International Conference on System Reliability and Safety (ICSRS), pages 584–589. IEEE, 2019.
Marinescu et al. [2021] Alexandru Daniel Marinescu, Alexandru Valentin Radulescu, and Irina Radulescu. Researches concerning the hydraulic oil degradation process in gear pumps. Journal of Research & Innovation for Sustainable Society (JRISS), (2), 2021.
Shi et al. [2021] Haotian Shi, Dian Huo, Hongpeng Zhang, Wei Li, Yuqing Sun, Guobin Li, and Haiquan Chen. An impedance sensor for distinguishing multi-contaminants in hydraulic oil of offshore machinery. Micromachines, 12(11):1407, 2021.
Zeng et al. [2018] Lin Zeng, Hongpeng Zhang, Qiang Wang, and Xingming Zhang. Monitoring of non-ferrous wear debris in hydraulic oil by detecting the equivalent resistance of inductive sensors. Micromachines, 9(3):117, 2018.
MAC Hydraulics [2023] MAC Hydraulics. Common causes of hydraulic hose failure. https://mac-hyd.com/blog/common-causes-of-hydraulic-hose-failure/, 2023.
Corporation [Accessed November 21, 2023] Parker Hannifin Corporation. Top 8 reasons hydraulic hoses fail. https://blog.parker.com/site/usa/details-home-page/top-8-reasons-hydraulic-hoses-fail-us, Accessed November 21, 2023.
A guide to recognizing the causes of hose failure. https://www.powermotiontech.com/hydraulics/hose-tubing/article/21884482/parker-hannifin-corp-hose-products-div-a-guide-to-recognizing-the-causes-of-hose-failure. Accessed: November 21, 2023.
new [2023] 13 causes of hose failure. https://www.new-line.com/information/causes-of-hose-failure, 2023. Accessed on November 21, 2023.
Hyvärinen et al. [2020] Jari Hyvärinen, Matts Karlsson, and Lin Zhou. Study of concept for hydraulic hose dynamics investigations to enable understanding of the hose fluid–structure interaction behavior. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 12(4):1687814020916110, 2020.
Li et al. [2023] Yue Li, Yan Bai, Xiaolin Li, Peishuo Liu, and Changwei Shi. Failure analysis of high pressure hose in hydraulic loading system. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, volume 2468, page 012109. IOP Publishing, 2023.
Ying et al. [2022] Zhiping Ying, Zhongtao Lin, Zhenyu Wu, Kuan Liang, and XuDong Hu. A modified-yolov5s model for detection of wire braided hose defects. Measurement, 190:110683, 2022.
Klarecki and Rabsztyn [2023] Klaudiusz Klarecki and Dominik Rabsztyn. Hydraulic measuring hoses as pressure signal distortion—mathematical model and results of experimental tests. Sensors, 23(16):7056, 2023.
Ngu [2021] Alexander Ngu. Dimensional complexity and algorithmic efficiency. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.05050, 2021.
