ANALYSIS AND OPTIMIZATION OF A TWO-WAY VALVE USING RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY
Keywords:
hydraulic valves, priority valves, flow divider valves, optimization, design of experiments, response surface methodologyAbstract
This paper describes the use of a numerical procedure developed by the authors for the analysis and optimization of hydraulic components. The element taken as reference is a two-way priority spool valve, typically utilized in steering systems with a load sensing control strategy in the presence of other actuators. The valve’s purpose is to control the primary port flow rate, the exceeding flow being discharged to the secondary output port. The optimization algorithm is based on Response Surface Methodology techniques, adopting the path search method known as Steepest Descent. For this purpose, the component’s behaviour is analytically described by means of a properly defined objective function. The procedure approximates this objective function with a simple model whose coefficients are evaluated using an AMESim® model of the valve, previously verified using test results. The simulations required to find the fitting model are planned using Design Of Experiments (DOE) methods. Because of the large number of factors characterizing valve design a preliminary analysis (screening) based on DOE algorithms was performed in order to identify the parameters which significantly influence valve behaviour. This allows the important factors to be considered for the optimization phase. The entire numerical procedure was implemented through MATLAB® scripts which automatically execute the AMESIM® simulations to perform the screening analysis or optimization. Considering a configuration pertinent to a stock version of the valve as starting point of the procedure, the paper proposes an optimal configuration. Experimental investigations performed on a prototype reveal the improved performance achieved with the proposed design in comparison with the behaviour observed in different stock versions of the valve, highlighting the potential of the optimization procedure developed. Moreover, the results presented in the paper illustrate how the procedure can also be utilized to perform other analyses of component behaviour, for example, proving, useful guidelines for the definition of dimensional tolerances.
Downloads
References
Antony J. 2003. Design of Experiments for Engineers
and Scientists. Butterworth-Heinemann Elsevier.
Berta, G. L., Vacca, A., Franzoni, G. and Guidetti,
M. 2003. Load Sensing-Prioritätsventile – Model
fűr die Funktionssimulation. O+P, Ölhydraulik und
Pneumatik, No. 10.
Box, G. E. P. and Wilson, K. B. 1951. On the
Experimental Attainment of Optimum Conditions
(with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical
Society, Series B 13(1), pp. 1-45.
Box, G. E. P. and Draper, N. R. 1987. Empirical
Model Building and Response Surfaces Methodology.
J. Wiley & Sons.
Casoli, P., Vacca, A. and Franzoni, G. 2003. A Numerical
Model for the Simulation of Load Sensing
Spool Valves. The 18th Int. Conference on Hydraulics
and Pneumatics, Prague, Czech Republic.
Dahlén, L. and Crlsson, P. 2003. Numerical Optimization
of a Distributor Valve. Int. Journal of Fluid
Power, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 17-25.
Eschenauer, H., Koski, J. and Osyczka, A. 1990.
Multicriteria Design Optimization. Berlin, Springer
Verlag.
Fisher, R.A. 1935. The Design of Experiments. Edinburgh:
Oliver & Boyd. RE, RI.
Frangopoulos, C. A. 2003. Methods of Energy System
Optimization. Proc. of the Summer School Optimization
of Energy Systems and Processes, Gliwice,
Poland.
Karnopp, D. 1985. Computer Simulation of Stick Slip
Friction in Mechanical Dynamic Systems. Trans. of
ASME, Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement
and Control, Vol. 107, pp. 100-103.
Kleijnen, J. P. C., Hertog, D. and Angün E. 2002.
Response Surface Methodology’s Steepest Ascent
and Step Size Revisited. Proc. of the 2002 Winter
Simulation Conference, pp. 377-383.
Myers, R. H. 1999. Response Surface Methodology -
Current Status and Future Directions (including discussion),
Journal of Quality Technology, 31, No. 1,
pp. 30-74.
Myers, R. H. and Montgomery, D. C. 2002. Response
Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization
Using Designed Experiment. J. Wiley and
Sons.
Montgomery, D. C. 1997. Design and Analysis of
Experiments. J. Wiley & Sons.
Nervegna, N. 2003. Oleodinamica e Pneumatica:
Sistemi, Componenti, Esercitazioni. Vol. 1 and 2,
Politeko, Turin (Italy).
Papadopoulos, E. and Davliakos, E. 2004. A Sistematic
Methodology for Optimal Component Selection
of Electrohydraulic Servosystems. Int. Journal
of Fluid Power, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 15-24.
Ranjit, R. K. 2001. Design of Experiments Using the
Taguchi Approach: 16 Steps to Product and Process
Improvement. J. Wiley & Sons.
Sacks, J., Welch, W. J., Mitchell, T. J. and Wynn, H.
P. 1989. Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments.
Statistical Science, 4, No. 4, pp. 409-435.
Simpson, T. W., Mauery, T. M., Korte, J. J. and
Mistree, F. 2001. Kriging metamodels for Global
Approximation in Simulation-Based Multidisciplinary
Design Optimization. American Institute
of Aeronautics and Astronautics Journal.
Vacca A. 2006. Proposal of a Load Sensing Two-Way
Valve Model, Applying “Design of Experiments”
Techniques to Simulations. IMECE2006, 2006
ASME Int. Mech. Eng. Congress and Expo., Chigago
(IL), USA.
Vesely F. 2003. Design of Pilot Operated Relief Valve
by Use of the Simulation, The 18th Int. Conference
on Hydraulics and Pneumatics, Prague, Czech Republic.
Wiens, T., Burton, R., Schoenau, G. and Ruan J.
Optimization and Experimental Verification
of a Variable Ratio Flow Divider Valve. Int. Journal
of Fluid Power, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 45-53.
