STABILITY AND PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF A METERING POPPET VALVE

Authors

  • Roger Fales University of Missouri - Columbia, Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, Columbia, Missouri 65211, USA

Keywords:

poppet valve, uncertainty analysis

Abstract

Poppet type metering valves have many benefits including low leakage and an economical design. These benefits make the poppet valve an appealing alternative to spool valves in a valve stack. The fact that the metering element is not hydrostatically balanced as in a spool valve leads to control design challenges. In this work, a model of an electro hydraulic metering poppet valve is considered. Due to design compromises, the response of production metering poppet valves tends to be too slow to maintain a desired flow rate when there are fast upstream pressure variations. Redesigning to speed up the response of the valve may lead to stability issues which can be traced to plant uncertainty. Frequency response analysis of the valve model shows that the model varies greatly depending on the operating point chosen for the linearization. The analysis presented will help define the problem of designing hardware and control systems for higher performance but still reliable metering poppet valves.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Roger Fales, University of Missouri - Columbia, Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, Columbia, Missouri 65211, USA

Roger Fales Professor Fales received his undergraduate and M.S. in Mechanical Engineering at Kansas State University in 1996 and 1998 respectively. He was employed in industry from 1998 to 2002 as a research engineer in the area of hydraulic systems and controls. He returned to school at Iowa State University and received a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering in 2004. In 2004, he joined the Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering Department at the University of Missouri – Columbia. As an assistant professor, he teaches and does research work in the areas of dynamics, systems, automatic control, and fluid power.

References

Johnston, D., Edge, K. and Vaughan, N.. 1991. Experimental

Investigation of Flow and Force Characteristics

of Hydraulic Poppet and Disc Valves. Proceedings

of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers

Part A, Vol. 205, No. (A3), pp. 161-171.

Opdenbosch, P., Sadegh, N. and Book, W. 2004.

Modeling and Control of an Electro-hydraulic Poppet

Valve. ASME International Mechanical Engineering

Congress and Exposition, Anaheim, CA.

Skogestad, S. and Postlethwaite, I. 1996. Multivariable

Feedback Control. Wiley. New York.

Vaughan, N., Johnston, D. and Edge, K. 1992. Numerical

Simulation of Fluid Flow in Poppet Valves.

Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, Vol.

, No. (C2), pp. 119-127.

Yang, R. 2004. Predicting Hydraulic Valve Flow

Forces Using CFD. ASME International Mechanical

Engineering Congress and Exposition, Anaheim,

CA.

Zhang, R., Alleyne, A. and Prasetiawan, E. 2002.

Performance Limitations of a Class of Two-stage

Electro-hydraulic Flow Valves. International Journal

of Fluid Power, Vol. 3, No. (1).

Downloads

Published

2006-08-01

How to Cite

Fales, R. (2006). STABILITY AND PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF A METERING POPPET VALVE. International Journal of Fluid Power, 7(2), 11–17. Retrieved from https://journals.riverpublishers.com/index.php/IJFP/article/view/554

Issue

Section

Original Article