Neural network based power management of hydraulic hybrid vehicles
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1080/14399776.2016.1232117Keywords:
dynamic programming, neural network, power management, Hydraulic hybridAbstract
Effective power management is key to maximizing the performance and efficiency of hydraulic hybrid powertrains. However, the strong influence of future driving events on the optimal control policy limits the effectiveness of many approaches investigated to date. To address this issue the authors have proposed and investigated a novel power management controller that aims to predict online the accumulator’s near optimal state trajectory. It is demonstrated in this paper that if the optimal accumulator state trajectory is known, then an implementable control scheme can achieve near globally optimal fuel efficiency. Controller development began by optimally controlling a series hybrid over a representative drive cycle using Dynamic Programming (DP). A Neural Network (NN) was then trained to reproduce the DP optimal accumulator pressure trajectory based on the vehicle’s velocity over the previous thirty seconds. In this way the NN generalized the relationship between vehicle velocity and accumulator pressure. The NN power management controller’s performance was then evaluated on a hardware-in-the-loop transmission dynamometer using untrained drive cycles to demonstrate the generality of the proposed approach. During these untrained evaluation cycles the NN controller was able to decrease average fuel consumption by 25.8% when compared to a baseline constant pressure control strategy.
Downloads
References
Argonne National Laboratory, 2015. PSAT (powertrain
systems analysis toolkit). Available from: www.
transportation.anl.gov.
Bellman, R., 1956. Dynamic programming and lagrange
multipliers. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences
of the United States of America, 42 (10), 767–769.
Bertsekas, D. and Bertsekas, D., 1995. Dynamic programming
and optimal control. vol 1. Belmont, MA: Athena Scientific.
Buchwald, P., et al., 1979. Improvement of a citybus fuel
economy using a hydraulic hybrid propulsion system –
a theoretical and experimental study. Proceedings of the
automotive engineering congress and exposition, 26
February–2 March 1979, Detroit, MI, USA. SAE paper
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 2015. Available
from: http://www3.epa.gov/nvfel/testing/dynamometer.
htm.
Heskitt, M., Smith, T., and Hopkins, J., 2012. Design &
development of the LCO-140H series hydraulic hybrid
low floor transit bus: BUSolutions final technical report
(No. FTA Report No. 0018). US Federal Transportation
Authority Report. Available from: http://ntl.bts.gov/
lib/55000/55500/55504/FTA_Report_No._0018.pdf
Johansson, A. and Ossyra, J.-C., 2010. Hydraulic hybrid
transmission design considerations for optimal customer
satisfaction. Proceedings of the 7th international fluid power
conference, 22–24 March 2010 Aachen, Germany.
Johri, R., Baseley, S., and Filipi, Z., 2011. Simultaneous
optimization of supervisory control and gear shift logic
for a parallel hydraulic hybrid refuse truck using stochastic
dynamic programming. ASME/bath symposium on fluid
power and motion control, Arlington, VI, USA.
Kim, Y. and Filipi, Z., 2007. Series hydraulic hybrid
propulsion for a light truck-optimizing the thermostatic
power management. In: Proceedings of the 8th International
Conference on Engines for Automobile, 16–20 September
Capri, Italy. SAE technical paper 2007-24-0080.
Kumar, R. and Ivantysynova, M., 2010. Investigation of
various power management strategies for a class of
hydraulic hybrid powertrains: theory and experiments.
Proceedings of the 6th FPNI PhD symposium, 15–19 June
West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Liu, J. and Peng, H., 2006. Control optimization for a powersplit
hybrid vehicle. American control conference, 14–16
June 2006 Minneapolis, MN, USA. IEEE.
Mikeska, D. and Ivantysynova, M., 2002. A precise steadystate
model of displacement machines for the application
in virtual prototyping of power-split drives. Proceedings of
the 2nd FPNI PhD symposium, 3–6 July 2002 Modena, Italy.
Moré, J., 1978. The Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm:
implementation and theory. In: Numerical analysis. Berlin
Heidelberg: Springer, 105–116.
Musardo, C., et al., 2005. A-ECMS: an adaptive algorithm
for hybrid electric vehicle energy management. European
journal of control, 11 (4), 509–524.
Pourmovahed, A., et al., 1988. Experimental evaluation
of hydraulic accumulator efficiency with and without
elastomeric foam. Journal of propulsion and power, 4 (2),
–192.
PSA-Peugeot-Citroen, 2015. Hybrid air, an innovative full
hybrid gasoline system. Available from: http://www.psapeugeot-
citroen.com.
Sprengel, M. and Ivantysynova, M. 2013. Investigation and
energetic analysis of a novel hydraulic hybrid architecture
for on-road vehicles. Proceedings of the 13th scandinavian
international conference on fluid power, 3–5 June 2013
Linkoping, Sweden.
Sprengel, M. and Ivantysynova, M., 2014. Hardware-inthe-
loop testing of a novel blended hydraulic hybrid
transmission. Proceedings of the 8th FPNI PhD symposium
on fluid power, 11–13 June 2014 Lappeenranta, Finland.
Wendel, G., et al., 2007. Hydraulic hybrid vehicle system
panel. Michigan clean fleet conference, 17 May 2007
Detroit, MI, USA.
Wu, B., et al., 2004. Optimal power management for a
hydraulic hybrid delivery truck. Vehicle system dynamics,
(1–2), 23–40.