Experimental Generation of High-Frequency Oscillatory Flow in Hydraulic Systems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13052/ijfp1439-9776.2726Keywords:
High-frequency oscillatory flow, hydraulic test rig, gain-scheduled PID control, virtual flow sensor, experimental validationAbstract
Volumetric flow rate sensors are used in various technical applications. Therefore, it is interesting to use volumetric flow sensors that neither obstruct nor manipulate the flow to be measured nor are restricted to certain flow types and profiles. For this reason, the virtual volumetric flow sensor was developed. A test rig was constructed to validate this soft sensor, which can generate laminar, turbulent, steady, and unsteady flow rates. The dynamic part of the flow is generated by coupling three cylinders and operating a servo valve. In this work, an experimental hydraulic test platform capable of generating reproducible high-frequency oscillatory flow rates is investigated as an enabling system for validating a pressure-based virtual volumetric flow sensor. Two gain-scheduled PID control strategies are implemented to realize the required excitation profiles. Both controllers were intensively investigated on the test rig for various high-frequency scenarios, including pulsations up to 80 Hz. At 80 Hz, the direct controller achieves a normalized mean absolute error of 36.3% (including phase delay). After phase alignment, waveform fidelity corresponds to an nMAE of 10.1%, demonstrating suitability for high-frequency soft-sensor validation. The comparative results show that direct velocity control remains effective up to excitation frequencies of 80 Hz, while indirect position-based control becomes ineffective above approximately 40 Hz due to inherent phase delay. Eventually, the generated dynamic flow rate is utilized to demonstrate the high accuracy of the soft sensor for an oscillation of 20 Hz.
Downloads
References
F. Brumand-Poor, T. Kotte, E. Pasquini, and K. Schmitz. Signal processing for high-frequency flow rate determination: An analytical soft sensor using two pressure signals. Signals, 2024.
F. Brumand-Poor, T. Kotte, E. Pasquini, F. Kratschun, J. Enking, and K. Schmitz. Unsteady flow rate in transient, incompressible pipe flow. Z Angew Math Mech. e, 2024.
F. Brumand-Poor, M. Schüpfer, A. Merkel, and K. Schmitz. Development of a hydraulic test rig for a virtual flow sensor. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth Scandinavian International Conference on Fluid Power (SICFP’23), 2023.
F. Brumand-Poor, T. Kotte, M. Schüpfer, F. Figge, and K. Schmitz. High-frequency flow rate determination - a pressure-based measurement approach. Preprints, 2024.
Ayaka Kashima, Pedro Lee, and Mohamed Ghidaoui. A selective literature review of methods for measuring the flow rate in pipe transient flows. BHR Group - 11th International Conferences on Pressure Surges, pages 733–742, 01 2012.
Y. Duensing, O. Richert, and K. Schmitz. Investigating the condition monitoring potential of oil conductivity for wear identification in electro hydrostatic actuators. Proceedings of the ASME/Bath 2021 Symposium on Fluid Power and Motion Control, 2021.
B. Brunone and A. Berni. Wall shear stress in transient turbulent pipe flow by local velocity measurement. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 136, 2010.
I. Grant. Particle image velocimetry: A review. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, pages 55–76, 1997.
M. Henry and M. Zamora. The dynamic response of coriolis mass flow meters: Theory and applications. Technical Papers of ISA, 454, 2004.
Bernhard Manhartsgruber. Instantaneous liquid flow rate measurement utilizing the dynamics of laminar pipe flow. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 130(12), 2008.
D. Wiklund and M. Peluso. Quantifying and specifying the dynamic response of flowmeters. Conference: ISA, 422:463–476, 2002.
R. Mottram. Introduction: An overview of pulsating flow measurement. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 3:114–117, 1992.
G. J. Brereton, H. J. Schock, and M. A. A. Rahi. An indirect pressure-gradient technique for measuring instantaneous flow rates in unsteady duct flows. Experiments in Fluids, 40(2):238–244, 2006.
G. J. Brereton, H. J. Schock, and J. C. Bedford. An indirect technique for determining instantaneous flow rate from centerline velocity in unsteady duct flows. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 19(1):9–15, 2008.
L. R. Joel Sundstrom, Simindokht Saemi, Mehrdad Raisee, and Michel J. Cervantes. Improved frictional modeling for the pressure-time method. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 69:101604, 2019.
Eric Foucault and Philippe Szeger. Unsteady flowmeter. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 69:101607, 2019.
F. Javier García García and Pablo Fariñas Alvariño. On an analytic solution for general unsteady/transient turbulent pipe flow and starting turbulent flow. European Journal of Mechanics - B/Fluids, 74:200–210, 2019.
F. Javier García García and Pablo Fariñas Alvariño. On the analytic explanation of experiments where turbulence vanishes in pipe flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 951:A4, 2022.
Kamil Urbanowicz, Anton Bergant, Michał Stosiak, Adam Deptuła, and Mykola Karpenko. Navier-stokes solutions for accelerating pipe flow—a review of analytical models. Energies, 16(3):1407, 2023.
Kamil Urbanowicz, Anton Bergant, Michał Stosiak, Mykola Karpenko, and Marijonas Bogdevičius. Developments in analytical wall shear stress modelling for water hammer phenomena. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 562:117848, 2023.
A. Bayle, F. Rein, and F. Plouraboué. Frequency varying rheology-based fluid–structure-interactions waves in liquid-filled visco-elastic pipes. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 562, 2023.
Alexandre Bayle and Franck Plouraboue. Laplace-domain fluid–structure interaction solutions for water hammer waves in a pipe. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 150(2), 2024.
Y. Gao, Y. Shen, T. Xu, W. Zhang, and L. Güvenc. Oscillatory yaw motion control for hydraulic power steering articulated vehicles considering the influence of varying bulk modulus. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2019.
Y. Ye, C.-B. Yin, Y. Gong, and J. Zhou. Position control of nonlinear hydraulic system using an improved pso based pid controller. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2016.
T. O. Andersen, M. R. Hansen, H. C. Pedersen, and F. Conrad. On the control of hydraulic servo systems - evaluation of liinear and non-linear control schemes. In The Ninth Scandinavian International Conference on Fluid Power, SICFP’05, 2005.
Katharina Schmitz and Hubertus Murrenhoff. Hydraulik, volume 002 of Reihe Fluidtechnik. U. Shaker Verlag, Aachen, vollständig neu bearbeitete auflage edition, 2018.
L. Gan, L. Wang, and F. Huang. Adaptive backlash compensation for cnc machining applications. Machines, 2023.

