Green Business Model Innovation in Symbiosis Business Value Networks: Bridging Green Business Model Innovation to Different Green Symbiosis Business Value Networks with Future Wireless Technologies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13052/jmm1550-4646.1918Keywords:
Green Symbiosis Business Value Networks, Green Business Models, Green Business Model Innovation Approach, Green Business Model technologies, Future Wireless Technology, Advanced Sensor TechnologiesAbstract
Societies all over the globe push to greening businesses and their business models on all Green Business Model Parameters. However, they are challenged to find efficiency in green business models innovation and to jump to the next step of “the Green Wall” – greening their businesses.
There is therefore a growing interest to investigate Green Business Model Innovation (GBMI)in Symbiosis Business Value Networks. The profitability and achievement of other values seems in Green Symbiosis Business Value Networks (GSBVN) to be much higher than classical GBMI isolated to single business model innovation. In this context the GSBVN seems to be a promising initiative and new strategic way to go – to increase transformation of business models into green business models. The GSBVNs seems by nature to be built for greening our society and businesses operations.
Our hypothesis is that GSBVN could potentially achieve better results and effects on “the triple bottom line”combined with future wireless technologies and advanced sensor technologies. As 5G and beyond technologies offer better networks solutions “the Green Wall”challenges can be overcome because sensoring, measurement, calculations and monitoring the green business models and GBMI in the terms of monetary and nonmonetary values can be performed much more detailed, in real-time and for the entire lifetime of all the GSBVN’s business models. Fundamentally security, strong network constructions and trust are core to GSBVN’s growth. Embedding Future Wireless Networks (FWN)s and advanced sensor technologies seems to be able to make this become even easier, and a promising way to achieve the green business model goals of the GSBVNs and the surrounding society.
There is a lack of studies regarding the potential and initiatives of GBMI in GSBVN. This paper tries to fill some part of this gap by presenting some initial studies on (i) How can green business model innovation in symbiosis be defined? and (ii) How can Future Wireless Technologies support and value the innovation and evolvement of Green Business Models in Symbiosis Business Value Networks.
The paper seeks to unwrap different GSBVNs’ approaches, origins, and views. The paper ends up with discussing the role future wireless technologies can play in designing, reconfiguring, developing and operating GSBVNs.
Downloads
References
Håkonson, Håkan and Ivan Snehota (1989) No business is an island: The network concept of business strategy Scandinavian Journal of Management Volume 5, Issue 3, 1989, Pages 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/0956-5221(89)90026-2
Etzkowitz, Henry (2008). The triple helix: university-industry-government innovation in action. New York: Routledge. ISBN 9780415964500. OCLC 173749026.
Carayannis, E.G. and Campbell, D.F.J. (2009). “’Mode 3’ and ’Quadruple Helix’: toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem” (PDF). International Journal of Technology.
Carayannis, Elias G; Barth, Thorsten D; Campbell, David FJ (2012). “The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation”. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship. 1 (1): 2. doi: 10.1186/2192-5372-1-2. ISSN 2192-5372.
Kleiner Art (1991) What Does It Mean to Be Green? July-August 1991 Issue Harvard Business Review.
Summer, Alex (2012) Managing Green Business Model Transformations Springer Verlag.
Čekanavičius, Linas, et al. “Green Business: Challenges and Practices.” Ekonomika, vol. 93, no. 1, 2014, pp. 74–88, doi: 10.15388/ekon.2014.0.3021
Symbiosecentrum http://www.symbioscentrum.se/symbiosutveckling/arsberattelser.4.2328e976160ddeefff24a16a.html
Symbiosecentrum Sotenäs (2020) http://www.symbioscentrum.se/download/18.401edc031795d7e3fae66259/1621337128461/A%CC%8Arsbera%CC%88ttelse%20Symbioscentrum%202020.pdf
Greenlab Skive https://www.greenlab.dk/
Lindgren, P et al. (2021) “Green Multi Business Models”. How to Measure Green Business Models and Green Business Model Innovation? Journal of Personal Wireless Communication Springer Article DOI: 10.1007/s11277-021-09189-2
Bocken Nancy, Frank Boons and Brian Baldassarre (2019) Sustainable business model experimentation by understanding ecologies of business models Journal of Cleaner Production, 20 January 2019.
Pieroni, Marina P.P. Tim C. McAloone and Daniela C.A. Pigosso (2019) Business model innovation for circular economy and sustainability: A review of approaches Journal of Cleaner Production Volume 215, 1 April 2019, Pages 198–216.
Nancy M.P. Bocken, Thijs H.J. Geradts (2020) Barriers and drivers to sustainable business model innovation: Organization design and dynamic capabilities Long Range Planning Volume 53, Issue 4, August 2020, 101950.
Karagülle, Ali Özgür. “Green Business for Sustainable Development and Competitiveness: An Overview of Turkish Logistics Industry.” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 41, 2012, pp. 456–60, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.04.055.
Lindgren, P (2016) The Business Model Ecosystem Journal of Multi Business Model Innovation and Technology Vol: 4, Issue: 2 Published In: May 2016 article No: 1, Page: 1–50. doi: https://doi.org/10.13052/jmbmit2245-456X.421
Lindgren P., (2017) The Business Model Relations Axiom Advanced Business Model Innovation Springer Wireless Personal Communications 95(3) Follow journal DOI: 10.1007/s11277-017-4420-z
Mirata, Murat and Tareq Emtairah (2005), Industrial symbiosis networks and the contribution to environmental innovation: The case of the Landskrona industrial symbiosis programme Journal of Cleaner Production Volume 13, Issues 10–11, August–September 2005, Pages 993–1002.
Chertow M.R. Industrial symbiosis: literature and taxonomy Annu. Rev. Energy Environ., 25 (2000), pp. 313–337, 10.1146/annurev.energy.25.1.313
European Commission, Brussels (2018) A Sustainable Bioeconomy for Europe: Strengthening the Connection Between economy, Society and the Environment—Updated Bioeconomy Strategy.
Green Climate Deal Danish Government and Industry (2020) https://fm.dk/nyheder/nyhedsarkiv/2020/juni/bred-klimaaftale-bringer-danmark-tilbage-i-den-groenne-foerertroeje/
Carus and Dammer, 2018The circular bioeconomy—concepts, opportunities, and limitations Ind. Biotechnol., 14 (2018), pp. 83–91, 10.1089/ind.2018.29121.mcaChertow, 2000.
Hagman, L., Feiz, R., 2021. Advancing the circular economy through organic by-product valorisation: a multi-criteria assessment of a wheat-based biorefinery. Waste biomass valorization. 10.1007/s12649-021-01440-y.
Korhonen et al., 2018 Circular economy as an essentially contested concept. Journal of Cleaner Production 175: 544–552. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.111
Lindgren, P (2021) A Scoping Review and Framework of Green Business Models Related to Future Wireless Technology: Bridging Green Business Models to Future Wireless Technology.
Lindgren, P (2021) 6G Technologies – How Can It Help Future Green Business Model Innovation Journal of Informations and security Technology River Publishers https://journals.riverpublishers.com/index.php/JICTS/article/view/8981/10677
Delmas, M. A., Burbano, V. C. (2011). The drivers of greenwashing. California Management Review, 54, 64–87.
Jacobsen, Noel Brings (2008) Industrial Symbiosis in Kalundborg, Denmark: A Quantitative Assessment of Economic and Environmental Aspects Wiley https://doi.org/10.1162/108819806775545411
Karlundborg Symbiosis http://www.symbiosis.dk/en/
Kvinna, Australia https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/002029400704000802
Poikela Kari https://norden.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:917624/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Martin M. (2015) Quantifying the environmental performance of an industrial symbiosis network of biofuel producers, Journal of Cleaner Production, 102, pp. 202–212.
